SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 issue63Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: using a critical friend to improve the clerkship experiencePoder, autoridade e liderança institucional na escola e na sala de aula: perspectivas sociológicas clássicas author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Share


Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação

Print version ISSN 0104-4036

Abstract

PALAZZO, Janete  and  GOMES, Candido Alberto. Plano de carreira e avaliação dos professores: encontros e desencontros. Ensaio: aval. pol. públ. educ. [online]. 2009, vol.17, n.63, pp.205-234. ISSN 0104-4036.

This study aimed to assess if the criteria for progressing in the professors' career of a higher education institution are the same that make a teacher good in the pupils' view. The literature highlights many factors that influence pupils' gains, however, it considers that the classic progressing criteria tend not to wield clearly effects on pupils' gains. The exploratory research project used, to collect data, a questionnaire filled out by students, previously constructed, tested and approved as part of the institutional evaluation process. Besides verifying the professors' performance from the students' perspective, this research project related professors' characteristics valued by the career ladder (degree, experience, seniority in the institution and academic publications) to their performance according to the students' evaluations. It was concluded that, in the institution investigated, there was no significant relationship between the evaluation of professors' performance and the variables for progressing in career, confirming the literature on basic education.

Keywords : Higher Education; Teaching Career; Education Economy; Teachers' Evaluation; Institutional Evaluation.

        · abstract in Portuguese | Spanish     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )