SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 issue3Digital technology as a tool for health promotion in an indigenous community in the Vale de São Francisco author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Share


Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica

Print version ISSN 0100-5502On-line version ISSN 1981-5271

Rev. Bras. Educ. Med. vol.47 no.3 Rio de Janeiro  2023  Epub Aug 16, 2023

https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v47.3-2022-0375 

EXPERIENCE REPORT

Gap analysis and perspectives on body donation programs: experience report in Brazil

Bárbara de Lima Lucas1  , writing the extension project for consideration, approval by the Pro-Rectory of Culture and Sports Extension (PROECE) of Universidade Federal de Jataí, developing the study, carrying out the interviews, designing and approving the final version of the manuscript
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2829-0508

Andréa Oxley da Rocha2  , reviewing the terms, forms and documents, preparing the discursive part, reviewing and approving the final version of the manuscript
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2725-1833

1 Universidade Federal de Jataí, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.

2 Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.


Abstract:

Introduction:

International recommendations reinforce the practice of voluntary donation for providing bodies for the training of health professionals, replacing the system of unclaimed bodies in medical courses (MC).

Experience report:

This work gathered information on Brazilian body donation programs (BDP), analyzed gaps and difficulties to the effectiveness of body donation, and proposed strategies to expand the information offered on the registration of participants in BDP and the effectiveness of the donation.

Discussion:

In Brazil, there are 39 BDP - six in the Northeast, four in the Midwest, one in the North, 11 in the South, and 17 in the Southeast - and two committees for body donation. Documents may be easily available through registration during life as a participant in the BDP, but it does not guarantee donation. In general, Brazilian’s institutions receive the donated body along with the documentation. When the death occurs in the same city of the institution, it is possible to have the transfer of the body provided by partnerships with funeral services and the city hall. There is no fee to be paid or received either for registration during life or for donation after death.

Conclusion:

Although the legislation has regulated the donation of body in life since 2002, it is necessary to implement campaigns to inform about the donation, in addition to mechanisms that can promote speed in the deadlines for obtaining documentation for the purpose of donating body for scientific purposes, the exemption of notary fees and the possibility of transporting the body donated with no fees by funeral home of municipal governments. The MC support through the registration of the PDC as an extension activity collaborates to ensure ethical aspects related to the participation of donors in the living program, with regard to the treatment with respect and dignity of donors and their families.

Keywords: Body Donation; Anatomy; Legislation

Resumo:

Introdução:

As recomendações internacionais reforçam o estímulo à prática da doação voluntária para a disponibilidade de corpos destinados à formação de profissionais de saúde, substituindo o sistema de corpos não reclamados nas instituições de ensino superior (IES).

Relato de experiência:

Este trabalho reuniu informações sobre programas de doação de corpos (PDC) brasileiros, analisou lacunas e fatores impeditivos à doação do corpo, e propôs estratégias para ampliar as informações sobre o cadastro de participantes em PDC e a efetivação da doação.

Discussão:

No Brasil existem 39 PDC em funcionamento - seis no Nordeste, quatro no Centro-Oeste, um no Norte, 11 no Sul e 17 no Sudeste - e duas comissões de distribuição de corpos para ensino. O cadastro como participante no PDC pode agilizar as providências documentais, mas não garante a doação na ocasião da morte. No geral, as IES recebem o corpo doado e a documentação necessária. Quando o óbito acontece no município da IES, é possível ter o translado do corpo providenciado por parcerias com funerárias e prefeitura.

Conclusão:

Embora a legislação tenha regulamentado desde 2002 a doação do próprio corpo em vida, é necessária a implementação de campanhas de esclarecimento à população geral sobre essa possibilidade, além de mecanismos que possam promover a celeridade nos prazos de para obtenção das documentações com a finalidade de doação de corpo para fins científicos, a isenção das taxas cartoriais e a viabilização do translado do corpo doado por carro de funerária das prefeituras, sem custo. O apoio da IES por meio do cadastro do PDC como atividade de extensão universitária colabora para assegurar aspectos éticos relacionados à participação dos doadores no programa em vida, no que se refere ao tratamento com respeito e dignidade dos doadores e de suas famílias.

Palavras-chave: Doação de Corpo; Anatomia; Legislação

INTRODUCTION

Although there are alternative available technologies, there is still no consensus on the possibility of replacing the dissected human body in anatomy teaching, ensuring perceptions of texture, dimensions and syntopy between structures of the human body1)-(5. The practical learning, using the human body, was related to a lower possibility of errors in medical procedures, due to the training of essential skills and competences for the training of health professionals6. In addition to technical learning, the ethical and moral burden involved, providing a humanized training, by placing the student, or professional undergoing training, in the presence of a dissected human body3),(7),(8.

The International Federation of Anatomists (IFAA) recommends that obtaining human material for teaching should occur through body donation programs, replacing the use of unclaimed bodies for this purpose9)-(12. Moreover, among the good practices recommendations of this federation to guide the adequate operation of body donation programs (BDPs) for scientific purposes, is the use of a term of donation that contains the notarized signature, as a form of consent of the donor who registers it during one’s lifetime12.

In Brazil, most higher education institutions (HEIs) use unclaimed bodies to teach human anatomy, supported by Law N. 8,501, of 199213. However, this number has been progressively reduced3, since the technological development and resources for identifying individuals and locating their family members, have resulted in a reduction in the number of unclaimed bodies available for this purpose14. A recent quantitative survey of BDPs found a total of 28 programs in Brazil in 201915. The highest prevalence is found in public universities, preferably concentrated in the South and Southeast regions. However, according to the Federal Council of Medicine (CFM, Conselho Federal de Medicina), with 342 medical schools, Brazil currently has an average of 10.4 newly graduated medical professionals for each group of 100,000 inhabitants16),(17. The disproportion between the number of BDPs and medical schools suggests that encouraging the creation of new BDPs can solve the lack of bodies for teaching and research purposes.

Another aspect to be considered is that the majority of the Brazilian population is unaware of the possibility of donating their own body, during one’s lifetime, to science, although Law n. 10.40618 of the Brazilian Civil Code has guaranteed this process since 2002 3),(19)-(27. Given this context, a search was carried out for existing BDPs in the country and interviews were conducted with the team members of these programs aiming to assess the operating structure and difficulties related to the implementation of these programs by Brazilian universities.

EXPERIENCE REPORT

A university extension project was prepared and approved by the Pro-Rector of Extension Culture and Sport (PROECE, Pró-reitora de Extensão Cultura e Esporte) of Universidade Federal de Jataí, aiming at interviewing members of the BDP team operating in the country. The extension action was proposed in partnership with TV Câmara and the School of Management and Legislative Efficiency (EGEL, Escola de Gestão e Eficiência Legislativa) of the City Council of Jataí.

The survey of BDPs in operation initially considered data published by da Silva et.al.15 in 2019 (28 BDPs), followed by a search on research sites using the terms “body donation program” and “body donation for scientific purposes”. Two state commissions were identified in Brazil, which were in charge of attracting and distributing bodies to the HEIs, in addition to 39 BDPs organized in different HEIs, distributed in the Northeast (6), Midwest (4), North (1), South (11), and Southeast (17) regions. Based on these data, a schedule of activities was organized, with a list of BDPs and the respective virtual interview prediction. An invitation letter was sent via Official Letter (Process SEI n. 23854.001433/2022-51), together with the copyright transfer document, authorization to record the interview, and public disclosure of the material produced by TV Câmara. All positive responses were followed by the creation of the interview script with the interviewee. This document was shared for the editing of questions and topics to be discussed, according to the interviewee’s preference, and filling in of information about the BDP: e-mail, contact telephone number, teacher/technician in charge, and virtual page. Such information was filled in by the team of each BDP so it could be made available on the interview screen without typing errors, with the aim of disclosing it.

Of the 41 invitations sent, 34 answered positively. The interviews were conducted with teachers, technicians and members of the organizing team of each BDP. The virtual meetings took place between March and September of 2022. Six BDPs did not participate due to unavailability of team members, such as: medical leave, transfers and dismissals. The interviews were recorded and made available as open access on social networks aiming to offer audiovisual material for local dissemination and information for the population about body donation for each BDP.

Body Donation through Body Distribution Committees

A Committee was located at the state level (Paraná) and one at the municipal level (Brasília). The board members of these councils and committees that regulate body donation for scientific purposes were appointed to share, through recorded interviews, information aimed at providing information to the population. According to the interviewees’ reports, in most cases, donations take place through the action of family members, when there was a verbal manifestation of the intention to donate one’s body, during the deceased person’s lifetime. The documentation is provided by official letter from the death certificate or declaration issued by the Death Verification Services (SVO, Serviços de Verificação de Óbito) or Coroner’s office (IML, Instituto Médico-Legal). When the body originates from the IML, in addition to the death certificate, it is necessary to wait for the Body Release document, and respective personal documents that confirm the family relationship with the donors. Then, the Death Certificate is requested through an Official Letter, which is free of charge, in accordance with Article 45 of Law N. 8935, of 199427. In this document, the death certificate must be drawn up, mentioning the HEI that will receive the donated body.

In the Federal District there is great incentive and collaboration for the provision of biological material for scientific purposes. The Public Ministry of the Federal District and Territories (MPDFT) published Ordinance n. 01 of 201028, which provides for the distribution of bodies donated by the Pró-Vida program to HEIs28. Around eight HEIs are registered to receive donations on a rotating basis through this program. If there is an available body, a teleconference is scheduled with the HEI at the time, within 24 hours of the family’s expression of interest in donating, making it possible to prepare the body at the health units or IML, although the HEI can move the technical team for this purpose, or forward the body for preparation at the anatomy laboratory. Usually, there is a body distribution rotation system, so that all registered HEIs are contemplated equally, although the donor can choose the HEI of their choice. There are no notarial fees, although the cost of transferring and preparing the body is the responsibility of the HEIs.

In the resolution signed by the attorney general of Justice n. 2455 of 201629 which regulates the supervision of the Public Ministry in the state over the processes of distribution of unclaimed bodies, as well as those originating from donations to HEIs registered with the State Council for Distribution of Corpses (CEDC, Conselho Estadual de Distribuição de Cadáveres), for study and research purposes29. Approximately 38 HEIs are registered to receive donations. There is a rotation system for body distribution, which seeks to make an equal distribution between the HEIs. The territorial extension of the state and the rotation system may represent some difficulty for the HEI to receive the body, when the body to be donated is far from the HEI following the rotation queue. However, direct donation to the HEI is possible, especially when there is a BDP in operation at the HEI. Although some HEIs have an agreement with notary offices, notarial fees for donation terms are the responsibility of the family or donors. The costs of the transportation are the responsibility of the HEI that will receive the body and the expenses with the preparation of the body are also the responsibility of the HEI, which can also hire an outsourced technical team to go to the health unit or IML that received the body after death.

Body Donation through the Body Donation Program (BDP)

It was observed that all the interviewed BDPs had the BDP project, when it was created, appraised and approved by an institutional council or committee, preferably the Pro-Rectory of Extension and Culture or the University Council. Then, generally, all terms of donation were appraised by the Institutional Legal Department. Although donation for scientific purposes is provided for in federal legislation18, the BDP registration as a university extension activity can guarantee users (internal and external academic community) not only compliance with institutional protocols, but also the transparency of the process, ensuring that good practices be followed when carrying out the BDP activities, in accordance with national and international recommendations10),(11. An opinion from the Research Ethics Committee (REC) is not required for the creation of the BDP and the respective associated extension actions. This recommendation was sent on December 1, 2022 by the National Research Ethics Committee (CONEP, Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa), as an Official Letter number 26-2022/CONEP, for recommendations to all Research Ethics Committees in operation at Brazilian universities. However, as with any research, all protocols originated from BDPs must be appreciated by local ethical committee.

Donor registration and signature of the Term of Donation (TD)

Among the recommendations of good practices cited to guide the adequate functioning of the BDPs, the consent of the registered participant during their lifetime is a prerequisite, in addition to the requirement of the notarized signature of the term of donation (TD) in life8),(12. The TD consists of a statement authorizing the use of one’s body in part or as a whole for scientific purposes, after death. This prerequisite is essential and consists of legal support for the HEI. Donors must be completely free in their decision to donate, thus this excludes donations from those under 18 years, death row inmates, and institutionalized individuals.

Only the donor’s signature must be notarized and, usually, the notarial fees are the responsibility of the donor and the family. Some states such as Rio Grande do Sul and Espírito Santo have made available the use of the Notarial and Registral Inspection Seal EQL-2. This seal consists of a unique identifier code and a QR code (in the case of external acts), which are printed directly on the documents. Its technology allows documents to be easily identified, authenticated and tracked at no cost, as it is a document qualified as a voluntary service. It was observed that all interviewed BDPs adopted the TD as a prerequisite for donor registration.

In addition to the TD, a Registration Form (RF) can be made available, which records personal data, such as: gender, age, level of schooling, religion, among other demographic data, for database purposes. In this sense, considering the future possibility of research with donated biological material, the Informed Consent Form (TCLE, Termo de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido) must be presented to the donor, which registers the aforementioned permissions and refusals for education and research purpose. There is no need for a notarized signature on the RF and TCLE. Completion of the living donor registration can be consolidated by the issuing of the “Donor Card”. This document, in addition to representing an important disclosure tool, confirms compliance with all the institution’s documentary prerequisites.

The terms of donation by the donor (TD) and the term of donation by the family member or legal guardian (TF) must include the name of the HEI that will receive the body and may contain a clause that provides for the future possibility of transferring the body to other HEIs, which can be accepted or not by the person when registering. All consulted BDPs usually register and identify the collection of stored biological material (received bodies), as well as when a body is transferred to another HEI.

Donation by the Family (TF) or legal guardian

Most programs accept both the donation through registration carried out by the donors themselves during their lifetime, and the donation made by family members or a legal guardian (without prior registration), when there has been a prior manifestation by the person of the intention to donate one’s body, but the registration (TD) has not been carried out, and the family expresses a consensus on this donation. Donation by family members or legal guardians, without prior registration by the donor, is supported by law, and must include completion of the Term of Donation by the Family or legal guardians (TF). That is, in the absence of the TD with a notarized signature, Article 4 of Law 9,434 of 199720 (and Law 10,211 of 2001)23 is used, which describes the need for a term signed by the family for the donation of organs, tissues or body parts. Among the donations by the family, we can mention the donation of stillbirths through the signature of the TF, which must be registered in a notary and delivered with the death certificate. In the situation of a abortion (when the fetus weighs more than 500g, or is longer than 25 cm, or gestational age is greater than 22 weeks), the family is responsible for the fetal destination30.

Donating organs or body parts during one’s lifetime

When there is an abortion of the fertilization product, usually with parameters lower than the criteria described above, there is no legal need to issue a death certificate. In this situation, the responsibility for the destination of the fetal loss lies with the assisting health service, since the family is legally unable to carry out the burial or cremation procedures, except by formal request. Parts of the human body of living people, submitted to surgical treatment (limbs, organs, placenta and abortion products), are considered biological material whose destination is the pathology service (for examination of the part) or incineration by the assistant health service (hospitals, clinics, laboratories, health departments), if it is discarded material. By characterizing the scientific value, the material no longer meets the conditions of Group A of Collegiate Board Resolution (RDC, Resolução de Diretoria Colegiada) n. 222 of the National Health Surveillance Agency - Anvisa31. If the family wants to donate the fertilization product (abortion) for study purposes, it will be possible through the term of donation of organ or body parts (TO), prior to the surgical treatment of that organ.

Body Transfer

When the registered donor dies, the family must contact the BDP to notify them of the death. At this point, the BDP must organize its team to start the process of collecting the body, which includes the presence of an HEI employee (most often the anatomy laboratory technician) and the undertaker, the latter responsible for transporting the body. The presence of the undertaker is a legal requirement for the procedures for releasing the body and transporting it. The HEI employee, duly identified, becomes the representative of the institution that becomes responsible for the body, after the process of issuing the death certificate containing the drawing up of the death settlement for the HEI of destination of the body (in the field destined at the placement of the cemetery where the body will be buried, will be placed the name of the HEI that will receive the body).

Some partnerships may make it possible to transport the body from the place of death to the anatomy laboratory of the HEI that will receive the donation, such as partnerships with the municipal government, funeral home or local hospitals. Another possibility is to carry out a bidding process by the HEI to hire a funeral service responsible for carrying out the legal release process, collecting the body and transporting it, considering the short viability of the body after death. However, when the death happens far from the HEI, in view of the cost, the family can arrange for the transfer (funeral service and car).

The establishment of partnerships should aim to facilitate the collection of bodies, reduce the financial cost when it comes to transportation and notarial expenses. The donation of the body, in whole or in part, must be completely free and subject to voluntary consent, motivated by solidarity in favor of improving the quality of teaching and scientific progress in the health area9)-(12),(17),(21 and, in addition, according to article 15 of Law 9,434 of 199720, (and Law n. 10,211 of 2001)23, the trade in tissues, organs or parts of the human body constitutes a crime. In this way, other charges or financial considerations are not recommended, and only the expenses inherent to the death process, to obtain the relevant documentation, are the responsibility of the donor or their family members. All information on the preparation, handling of the body, and conditions of destination of the mortal remains must also be provided. The individual, when registering in a BDP, must be aware that formalizing participation in the extension action only organizes the documentary arrangements, but it is not a guarantee of acceptance of the body by the laboratory, having as main conditioning factors: the cause of death, place of death and family decision.

DISCUSSION

The contribution to the qualification of medical learning was the biggest motivating factor for donation reported by respondents and confirmed in the literature13),(32)-(39. The main limiting factor identified for the increase in body donations is based on the lack of knowledge by most of the Brazilian population about the possibility of donating one’s body during their lifetime; however, other factors such as the difficulty of locating the BDP in the interior of the country, and the lack of knowledge about the registration process during one’s lifetime are also factors that make the donation process difficult. However, a significant increase in the number of BDPs was observed in Brazil: of the 28 BDPs operating in 201915, 39 were quantified in 2023, that is, there were 11 new BDPs in four years.

The lack of clear information about body donation and the whole process related to it favors the emergence of doubts, such as the possibility of having farewell rituals after the death (death wake), the lack of knowledge about the process of preparation, storage and disposal of the body after the study, how the body will be treated by the students and by the support team of the anatomy laboratories14),(32)-(37. Although donors or their families may be afraid of disrespect for the donated body, it is important to highlight that the vilification of bodies is considered a crime against respect for the dead, provided for in article 212 of the Brazilian Penal Code.22

In a recent study, Riederer33 stated that to maintain the BDP, it is essential to first understand the “common sense” of the population on the subject, and then adopt strategies that encourage donations. Moreover, the same author suggests that donor profile studies provide useful information about donors, and the reasons why they donate, which can be used to target potential donors when establishing BDPs, to circumvent difficulties in finding donors, or to monitor changes in the donor profile. In Brazil, da Rocha AO, et.al. (2017)37 in an analysis of 400 donors registered in the BDP of Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), observed that most people who decided to donate their bodies (registered) were predominantly elderly, female, single or unmarried, affiliated with a religious group, middle class and who had at least finished high school or had finished or not a higher education course, with 60% of the donors being over 60 years old at the time of the registration. An absence of religious affiliation among potential donors has been described in some studies32),(39. In this Brazilian study37, on the contrary, 89% of the donors registered in the BDPs declared belonging to some religious group, and this was not a factor that influenced the decision38)-(39. Thus, the study of the donor’s profile helps not only to identify this group to direct awareness campaigns about donation, but also to dispel some myths about the donation.

All interviewed BDPs allow farewell ceremonies and death wakes on the occasion of death, provided that there is a prior dialogue allowing the process of preparing the body within the deadline. Some BDPs hold an annual ceremony in acknowledgement to body donors for science, which helps to demystify the donation process and demonstrates to the donors’ families the students’ respect when using these bodies to study24),(40. Visits to anatomy laboratories are also not allowed by most of the interviewed BDPs, leaving the display of human material for academic-scientific purposes only.

The population’s lack of information is frequently cited in the literature and was the main difficulty reported by the respondents26),(27),(33)-(40. Disclosure should start within the academic community itself, when the BDP is created, and go through the various Institutional instances, so that the students themselves act as information agents, when questioned. And, only after the complete internal structuring of the BDP, external disclosure through the media should begin. In some HEIs, the absence of virtual pages about the BDP linked to the institutional website, the lack of telephone contact or even institutional email was observed. On the other hand, some BDPs have pages on institutional websites with all the necessary information and documents, a toll-free dialing system, such as a 0800 number, or provide a “donor card” based on an institutional identification card.

Based on these observations, it is necessary to raise awareness in the internal (academic) community, including scientific evaluation committees, outsourced personnel and service providers to HEIs, about the importance of BDPs for teaching, training of health professionals and benefits for society. Many programs promoted dissemination to the population, through printed media, using pamphlets and educational lectures in nursing homes, hospitals and religious centers. However, all the interviewed BDPs agreed that the dissemination in the media (Radio, Newspaper and TV) led to an increase in the demand for information about the possibility of body donation and for registrations in the BDPs. The recognition of the donor’s profile proposes the recommendation of special attention to dissemination in social networks, which are mostly used by younger individuals, different from the target audience of the BDPs, which are elderly individuals.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

The creation of BDPs is a growing reality in the country, due to the reduced availability of unclaimed bodies. Although the legislation has regulated the donation of one’s body during their lifetime since 2002, it is necessary to implement campaigns to clarify the general population about this possibility, in addition to establishing mechanisms that can promote speed in the deadlines for obtaining documentation for the purpose of body donation for scientific purposes, the exemption of notarial fees and the feasibility of transferring the body donated by funeral home cars of municipal governments, free of charge. There is a consensus in the literature8)-(12),(22),(37)-(39, and among the interviewed BDP teams40, about the need to ensure ethical principles for the adequate operation of the BDP, regarding the treatment with respect and dignity of donors and their families. The HEI’s support through the registration of the BDP as a university extension activity collaborates to ensure ethical aspects related to the participation of donors in the program during one’s lifetime. All the interviewed BDPs submitted the project for the appreciation of the legal bodies of the HEIs and the Pro-rector of Extension and Culture (PROECE) or the University Council (CONSUNI). Promoting recommendations to society on the value of the donation ensures transparency to the process and increases the credibility of the BDP, in addition to society’s confidence in the procedures necessary to make the donation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are immensely grateful to body donors and donors who registered in the programs by donating their bodies, which allowed the analysis of the information presented in this study, as well as the for the great collaboration of TV e Rádio Câmara40 and the School of Management and Legislative Efficiency (EGEL), both from the Jataí City Council, for recording, editing and making available on their virtual page as publicity material the series of interviews: “Body Donation Program: information to the donor”.

REFERENCES

1. Costa GBF, Lins CCSA. O cadáver no ensino da anatomia humana: uma visão metodológica e bioética. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2012;36(3):369-73.. [ Links ]

2. Hamilton SS, Yuan BJ, Lachman N, Hellyer NJ, Krause DA. Hollman JH, et al. Interprofessional education in gross anatomy: experience with first-year medical and physical therapy students at Mayo Clinic. Anat Sci Educ. 2008 Nov-Dec;1(6):258-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.59. [ Links ]

3. Rocha AO da, Tormes DA, Lehmann N, Schwab RS, Canto RT. The body donation program at the Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre: a successful experience in Brazil. Anat Sci Educ . 2013 May-June;6(3):199-204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1335. [ Links ]

4. Zhang X, Peng L, Li LJ, Fan W, Deng J, Wei X, et al. Knowledge, attitude and willingness of different ethnicities to participate in cadaver donation programs. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 12;15(3):e0229529. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229529. [ Links ]

5. Habicht JL, Kiessling C, Winkelmann A. Bodies for anatomy education in medical schools: an overview of the sources of cadavers worldwide. Acad Med. 2018 Sept;93(9):1293-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002227. [ Links ]

6. Aragão JA, Fonseca Barreto AT, Brito CJ, Guerra DR, Nunes Mota JC, Reis FP. The availability of teaching-pedagogical resources used for promotion of learning in teaching human anatomy. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013 Aug 30;4:157-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S47145. [ Links ]

7. Prakash, Prabhu LV, Rai R, D’Costa S, Jiji PJ, Singh G. Cadavers as teachers in medical education: knowledge is the ultimate gift of body donors. Singapore Med J. 2007 Mar;48(3):186-9. [ Links ]

8. Arráez Aybar LA, Bueno López JL, Moxham BJ. Anatomists’ views on human body dissection and donation: an international survey. Ann Anat. 2014 Dec;196(6):376-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2014.06.004. [ Links ]

9. International Federation of Associations of Anatomists. Recommendations of good practice for the donation and study of human bodies and tissues for anatomical examination. Plexus: Newsletter of the Ifaa; 2012. p. 4-5. [acesso em 4 jul 2022]. Disponível em: Disponível em: http://www.ifaa.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/plexus_jan_2012-screen.pdf . [ Links ]

10. International Federation of Associations of Anatomists. Recommendations of good practice for the donation and study of human bodies and tissues for anatomical examination. Plexus: Newsletter of the Ifaa ; 2014. [acesso em 4 jul 2022]. Disponível em: Disponível em: http://www.ifaa.net/index.php/plexus/viewdownload/3-plexus/7-plexus-2014 . [ Links ]

11. Jones DG. Searching for good practice recommendations on body donation across diverse cultures. Clin Anat. 2016 Jan;29(1):55-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22648. [ Links ]

12. Bin P, Delbon P, Piras M, Paternoster M, Di Lorenzo P, Conti A. Donation of the body for scientific purposes in Italy: ethical and medico-legal considerations. Open Med (Wars). 2016 Aug 2;11(1):316-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2016-0060. [ Links ]

13. Brasil. Lei nº 8.501, de 30 de novembro de 1992. Código Civil. Dispõe sobre a utilização de cadáver não reclamado, para fins de estudos ou pesquisas científicas e dá outras providências. Brasília; 1992. [acesso em 4 jul 2022]. Disponível em: Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L8501.htm . [ Links ]

14. Volanek AF, Rissi R. Perspectiva da doação voluntária de corpos para utilização no ensino de anatomia: consciência social, disposição e fatores associados. Rev Ciênc Méd (Campinas). 2019;28(2):77-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0897v28n2a4566. [ Links ]

15. Silva EV da, Aversi Ferreira TA, Rocha AO da, Leite KJNS, Faria AB, Abreu T. Programas de doação de corpos no Brasil. Braz J Develop. 2020;6(12):101260-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n12-572. [ Links ]

16. Conselho Federal de Medicina. Número de faculdades dobra em 12 anos. Jornal Medicina. 2022;(324):1. [acesso em 4 jul 2022]. Disponível em: Disponível em: https://portal.cfm.org.br/noticias/edicao-destaca-crescimento-do-numero-de-escolas-medicas-no-pais-e-a-nova-gestao-do-cfm/ . [ Links ]

17. Ministério da Educação. Cadastro Nacional de Cursos e Instituições de Educação Superior: cadastro e-MEC. Brasília: MEC; 2017. [acesso em 4 jul 2022].Disponível em: Disponível em: https://emec.mec.gov.br/ . [ Links ]

18. Brasil. Lei nº 10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002. Código Civil. Brasília; 2022 [acesso em 10 jan 2022]. Disponível em: Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2002/l10406 . [ Links ]

19. Rocha AO da, Barros HP, Fazan VPS. Técnicas anatômicas. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Anatomia; 2021. [ Links ]

20. Brasil. Lei nº 9.434, de 4 de fevereiro de 1997. Código Civil. Dispõe sobre a remoção de órgãos, tecidos e partes do corpo humano para fins de transplante e tratamento e dá outras providências. Brasília; 1997 [acesso em 4 jul 2022]. Disponível em: Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L9434.htm . [ Links ]

21. Brasil. Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940. Rio de Janeiro; 1940 [acesso em 4 jul 2022]. Disponível em: Disponível em: https://presrepublica.jusbrasil.com.br/legislacao/91614/codigo-penal-decreto-lei-2848-40#art-212 . [ Links ]

22. Fernandes MS, Silla L, Goldim JR, Martins Costa J. Brazilian legal and bioethical approach about donation for research and patents of human body parts. J Community Genet. 2017 July;8(3):199-208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0303-y. [ Links ]

23. Brasil. Lei nº 10.211, de 23 de março de 2001. Código Civil, artigo 15. Comprar ou vender tecidos, órgãos ou partes do corpo humano. Brasília; 2001 [acesso em 4 jul 2022]. Disponível em: Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/leis_2001/l10211.htm . [ Links ]

24. Rocha AO da, Maués JL, Chies GAF, Silva AP da. Assessing the impact of a ceremony in honor of the body donors in the development of ethical and humanistic attitudes among medical students. Anat Sci Educ . 2020 July;13(4):467-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1920. [ Links ]

25. Cordeiro RG, Menezes RF. A falta de cadáveres para ensino e pesquisa. Rev Bras Educ Med . 2019;43(1):579-87. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v43suplemento1-20190217. [ Links ]

26. Simão TRP, Miglino MA, Silva JB da, McManus C, Liberti EA. Implementation of a program of voluntary body donation for anatomical study in the University of São Paulo, Brazil. Int J Morphol. 2016;34:1494-501.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022016000400051. [ Links ]

27. Brasil. Lei nº 8.935, de 18 de novembro de 1994. Código Civil. Dispõe sobre serviços notariais e de registro. Brasília; 1994 [acesso em 4 jul 2022]. Disponível em: Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8935.htm . [ Links ]

28. Ministério Público do Distrito Federal e Territórios. Portaria nº 1, de 23 de junho de 2010. Atualiza o protocolo para destinação e utilização de cadáveres e de partes do corpo humano para o ensino e a pesquisa científica. Brasília; 2010 [acesso em 22 ago 2019]. Disponível em: Disponível em: https://www.normasbrasil.com.br/norma/portaria-1-2010_220263.html . [ Links ]

29. Superintendência Geral de Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, Conselho Estadual de Distribuição de Cadáveres. Resolução PGJ nº 2455, de 16 de maio de 2016. Curitiba; 2016 [acesso em 16 abr 2022]. Disponível em: Disponível em: http://www.seti.pr.gov.br/conselhos/cedc . [ Links ]

30. Conselho Federal de Medicina. Resolução nº 1.779, de 11 de novembro de 2015. Regulamenta a responsabilidade médica no fornecimento da Declaração de Óbito. Revoga a Resolução CFM nº 1.601 de 2000. Brasília, 2015 [acesso em 22 ago 2019]. Disponível em: Disponível em: https://www.legisweb.com.br/legislacao/?id=101834 . [ Links ]

31. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução nº 222, de 11 de junho de 2018. Brasília; 2028 [acesso em 22 ago 2022]. Disponível em: Disponível em: https://www20.anvisa.gov.br/segurancadopaciente/index.php/legislacao/item/resolucao-rdc-n-222-de-28-de-marco-de-2018-comentada . [ Links ]

32. Richardson R, Hurwitz B. Donors’ attitudes towards body donation for dissection. Lancet. 1995 July 29;346(8970):277-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92166-4. [ Links ]

33. Riederer BM. Body donations today and tomorrow: what is best practice and why? Clin Anat . 2016;29(1):11-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22641. [ Links ]

34. Zhang L, Xiao M, Gu M, Zhang Y, Jin J, Ding J. An overview of the roles and responsibilities of Chinese medical colleges in body donation programs. Anat Sci Educ . 2014 July-Aug;7(4):312-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1422. [ Links ]

35. Bolt S, Venbrux E, Eisinga R, Gerrits PO. Anatomist on the dissecting table? Dutch anatomical professionals’ views on body donation. Clin Anat . 2012 Mar;25(2):168-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21215. [ Links ]

36. Mwachaka PM, Mandela P, Saidi H. Repeated exposure to dissection does not influence students’ attitudes towards human body donation for anatomy teaching. Anat Res Int. 2016;2016:9251049. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9251049. [ Links ]

37. Rocha AO da, Campos D de, Farina MA, Pacini GS, Girotto MC, Hilbig A. Using body donor demographics to assist the implementation of donation programs in Brazil. Anat Sci Educ . 2017 Sept;10(5):475-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1687. [ Links ]

38. Jiang J, Zhang M, Meng H, Cui X, Yang Y, Yuan L, et al. Demographic and motivational factors affecting the whole-body donation programme in Nanjing, China: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2020 Sept 6;10(9):e035539. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035539. [ Links ]

39. Bolt S, Venbrux E, Eisinga R, Kuks JB, Veening JG, Gerrits PO. Motivation for body donation to science: more than an altruistic act. Ann Anat . 2010 Apr 20;192(2):70-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2010.02.002. [ Links ]

40. Câmara Municipal de Jataí [Internet]. Programa doação de corpos para a ciência: Informações para os Doadores CMJ; [21 de agosto de 2022]; citado 21 de novembro de 2022. Disponível em: (Disponível em: (https://lah.jatai.ufg.br/p/43922-informacoes-para-os-doadores-tv-camara ) [ Links ]

6Evaluated by double blind review process.

SOURCES OF FUNDING The authors declare no sources of funding.

Received: February 23, 2023; Accepted: July 05, 2023

Chief Editor: Rosiane Viana Zuza Diniz. Associate Editor: Cristiane Barelli.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto sob uma licença Creative Commons