Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Share
Cadernos de História da Educação
On-line version ISSN 1982-7806
Cad. Hist. Educ. vol.20 Uberlândia 2021 Epub Jan 29, 2022
https://doi.org/10.14393/che-v20-2021-11
Articles
“Disseminating the lights for progress”. The expansion of the Normal School through municipal and private initiatives in São Paulo (1927-1930)1
1São Paulo State University (Brazil). leilinoue@yahoo.com.br
2São Paulo State University (Brazil). neryanaclara@gmail.com
The process of expansion of the Normal School in the state of São Paulo from the Reformation of Public Instruction between 1927 and 1930 is discussed. In search of solutions to end illiteracy, the Reform transformed São Paulo´s educational scene by equating the Non-official Normal Schools to Official Normal Schools. This measure made it possible for private associations and municipalities to create teacher-training institutions, duly acknowledged by the government, to train teachers to meet the demands of the Primary School. Current paper analyzes the activities of the state and the role of the municipalities in the process. Results show that, within the selected time frame, the expansion of Normal Schools was mainly due to municipal initiatives. Municipal activities were important for the expansion process of the Normal School, albeit ephemeral, allowing municipalities to be protagonists in forming teachers to act in distant regions out of reach of Official Normal Schools.
Keywords: History of teacher education; Normal School; Non-official Normal School
Neste artigo problematizamos o processo de expansão do Ensino Normal no estado de São Paulo a partir da Reforma da Instrução Pública de 1927 a 1930. Na busca de soluções para acabar com o analfabetismo, essa Reforma transformou o cenário educacional paulista, equiparando as Escolas Normais Livres às Escolas Normais Oficiais. Tal medida possibilitou que as associações particulares e os municípios criassem instituições para a formação de professores, devidamente reconhecidas pelo poder público, para formar professores para atender a demanda da escola primária. No recorte temporal selecionado observamos que, inicialmente, a expansão do Ensino Normal se deu principalmente pelas iniciativas municipais. Nosso objetivo é analisar as ações do estado e o papel do município nesse processo. Consideramos que as ações municipais, embora efêmeras, foram importantes para o processo de expansão do Ensino Normal possibilitando o protagonismo dos municípios em formar professores para atuarem nas regiões distantes das Escolas Normais Oficiais.
Palavras-chave: História da Formação docente; Ensino Normal; Escola Normal Livre
En este artículo discutimos el proceso de expansión de la Educación Normal en el estado de São Paulo a partir de la Reforma de la Instrucción Pública de 1927 a 1930. En búsqueda de soluciones para terminar con el analfabetismo, esta Reforma transformó la escena educativa de São Paulo, equiparando las Escuelas Normales Libres a las Escuelas Normales Oficiales. Esta medida hizo posible que las asociaciones privadas y los municipios creasen instituciones de capacitación docente, debidamente reconocidas por el gobierno, para capacitar a los docentes para satisfacer la demanda de la escuela primaria. En el marco de tiempo seleccionado, observamos que, inicialmente, la expansión de la Educación Normal se debió principalmente a iniciativas municipales. Nuestro objetivo es analizar las acciones del estado y el papel del municipio en este proceso. Consideramos que las acciones municipales, aunque efímeras, fueron importantes para el proceso de expansión de la Escuela Normal, posibilitando el protagonismo de los municipios en la formación de maestros para actuar en las regiones distantes de las Escuelas Normales Oficiales.
Palabras clave: Historia de la formación de maestros; Escuela Normal; Escuela Normal Libre
Teachers´ formation in the state of São Paulo
Teachers´ formation has been widely discussed, especially in the field of the History of Education in Brazil. Public and private formation institutions and their typologies, such as the Normal School, Non-Offical Normal School, Rural Normal School and Complementary School, pedagogical knowledge and practice, teachers´ associations, students and their organizations, school architecture and didactic material are the objects investigated under this topic.
Current article2 deals with a particular moment in which Non-Official Normal Schools3 were acknowledged by the government of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Through these institutions, the state increased the number of schools for teachers´ formation from 1927 onwards. This occurred due to the establishment of the Reform in Public Instruction under the aegis of Amadeu Mendes, general director of public instruction in São Paulo4. Inoue (2015) analyzed the schools´ establishment process and noted that several municipalities were the protagonists of the experience, regardless of having or not municipal primary schools. Non-Official Normal Schools, established and maintained by the municipality, had to collect tuition fees similar to private institutions. Official Normal Schools, established and maintained by the state, only collected a yearly matriculation fee in compliance to Decree 4,600 of the 30th May 1929, which regulated the 1927 reform5.
Current paper analyzes the state´s initiatives and the role of the municipality in the expansion process of the teaching profession. We will investigate the ways Normal Teaching in the state of São Paulo was disseminated as from the 1927 reform by equaling the Non-Official Normal Schools and the Official Normal Schools6. Our narrative is based on official sources, such as educational legislation (state and municipal), official documents (Relatório do Diretor Geral and the Anuário do Ensino of the state of São Paulo), newspapers (Correio Paulistano, O Estado de S. Paulo, O Linense and others) and such publications as Um Retrospecto (1930), by João Lourenço Rodrigues, Poliantéia Comemorativa do Primeiro Centenário do Ensino Normal do estado de São Paulo (1946), O Ensino Secundário e Normal do Estado de São Paulo (1949). Besides the above sources, we have delved into studies on the Official and Non-Official Normal Schools of the state of São Paulo within a determined period. Analysis is based on Chartier and his concept of representation according to which a given reality is constructed “by the interest of the group that form them. For each case, there is the necessary relationship of discourses with the position of those who use them” (1990, p. 17). Sources are investigated as from their documental nature and of their writers to understand the meaning constructed by the institution called the Non-Official Normal School.
The 1927 reform triggered the expansion of Normal Schools through “new urban nuclei in the state of São Paulo” which were established by the advance of coffee plantations and by foreign migration in the hinterland. As a consequence, the number of Non-Official Normal Schools increased significantly and surpassed the number of Official Normal Schools which remained the same till the end of the 1930s7. The law also benefitted municipalities of several regions that had demanded the opening of secondary schools. It seems that the only exception was Sorocaba which, due to the equivalence mentioned above, advanced with regard to the acknowledgement of the already extant municipal institution.
When the new regions in the state´s hinterland are analyzed8, it may be observed that the dissemination of public instruction is related to their population movement, urbanization and development. However, it was also related to local policies. Consequently, one cannot state that expansion occurred at the same rate in all the regions. The 1927 law, through its equivalence of private to public schools, provided primary teachers in the new urban nuclei trained in Non-Official Normal Schools established in these sites.
Private schools were regulated by the end of the 19th century9, but with regard to teachers´ formation, the government of the state of São Paulo acknowledged only diplomas of official schools, namely the Escola Normal da Capital and Complementary Schools. Schools leavers of the Non-Official Normal Schools10 in the pre-equivalence period could be teachers in private schools and in municipal schools or they could accept provisional incumbencies as lay teachers. The unsuccessful act of the law that demanded the equivalence of Non-Official Normal Schools and Official Normal Schools date from 1900 at the House of Representatives of the state of São Paulo (TANURI, 1973, p. 252-253).
Analysis of the measures to disseminate teachers´ formation in the state, beyond the model Escola Normal da Capital, boils down to three stages:
1st - transformation of Complementary Schools in teacher formation schools (the 1895 Gabriel Prestes Reform);
2nd - transformation of Complementary Schools in Primary and Secondary Normal Schools and the establishment of new Normal Schools (the 1911 Oscar Thompson Reform);
3rd - equivalence of Non-Official and Official Normal Schools (the 1927 Amadeu Mendes Reform).
Current paper deals with the third instance. The equivalence of Non-Official Normal Schools to the Official Normal Schools in 1927 was an emergency measure to form teachers for primary schools in regions (rural areas) which were distant from urban centers. In fact, it was highly criticized by certain educators as a loss of quality in teachers´ formation. Our survey, however, shows that till the 1950s the municipal and private initiatives triggered the spread of Normal Schools in the state of São Paulo.
The official discourse on equivalence underscores that private and municipal agents were invited to participate and cooperate with the state administration in this “patriotic mission” to disseminate public instruction against illiteracy: to spread the light for progress. The light metaphor11, largely used in the writings of the period12 to defend basic schooling, refers to the struggle against illiteracy and the overcoming of ignorance (darkness) to reach modernity. The Republic considered the school as a symbol of modernity since through it progress would be build (CARVALHO, 2003). Following Monarcha, in current study, the metaphor is employed for the school proper, or rather, the Non-Official Normal School.
Moreover, we would like to problematize the ways by which the collaboration between the state, municipal administration and associations private occurred because of the difficulty that several municipalities had to hire teachers who were willing to teach in difficult-to-reach areas and within poor budget conditions.
The Normal School, symbol of Modernity and socio-cultural progress (light) is underscored in the formation process of a new society. It would be an institution for teachers´ formation to teach illiterate people (darkness). Consequently, the 1920s were marked by several popular and intellectual vindications for the improvement and dissemination of the primary school, the product of several reforms in Public Schooling13 that tried to disseminate schooling and to eradicate illiteracy. One reform marks the third instance in the expansion of teacher formation referred above - the 1927 Reform in Public Instruction - with great transformations in the Normal School of São Paulo to disseminate primary schooling.
Activities of the state administration: the 1927 reform and the equivalence of the Non-Official Normal School
The 1927 reform aimed at equalizing schooling issues, particularly illiteracy, in the state of São Paulo, without any significant changes beyond making equivalent Non-Official Normal Schools, suppress special inspection positions, increase “the number of District Inspectors from 50 to 70” and “establish Supervising Inspectors of Non-Official Normal Schools with expenses (strangely) paid by the establishments themselves” (NERY, 2009, p. 102). The Reform did not produce any polemical writings in the mainstream press. It reduced formation period from 5 to 3 years in Official Normal Schools14. In fact, these measures, considered emergency measures by the administration, aimed at forming sufficient teachers for the existing positions, since the number of lay teachers 15 and of isolated schools on the state budget was on the increase. According to Tanuri (1979, p. 187), a statement by the state´s president, Júlio Prestes, informed that between 14th July 1927 and 30th July 1928, the bill of 2,012 classes, with 889 teachers with diploma and with 1,123 lay teachers was footed by the state.
Equivalence was justified since the current ten Official Normal Schools16 failed to provide teachers to attend to demand. Several teachers with diploma did not participate in the government-run schools and other refused to go to hard-to-reach towns and villages. According to Mendes (1929, p. 46),
The ten official normal schools, with a yearly average of 345 student-teachers were insufficient to attend to schooling needs. Five thousand teachers were required so that the constitution would be complied with to provide instruction to 150,000 school-going children, without matriculation, in the state´s rural schools, with an average of 30 students per class. This number would be provided by official schools within a minimum period of six years.
According to data by Amadeu Mendes, deficit occurred because 2,156 rural schools were established in 1926 and several could not function due to lack of teachers. In his 1929 Report, he justifies equaling Non-Official Normal Schools by quoting a speech by Júlio Prestes on the costs for the maintenance of Official Normal Schools and the decrease in costs that Non-Official Normal Schools would provide.
The ten normal schools maintained by the state of São Paulo cost a yearly 5.500:000$000, which shows that Non-Official normal schools, which should have the same results as the official normal schools, may save 14.3000:000$000, disregarding expenses for their establishment, and could be applied in the dissemination of primary teaching (MENDES, 1929, p. 58).
According to the General Director, so that the illiteracy rate would decrease, the number of primary schools had to increase, which, in turn, should be attended to by teachers formed in Normal Schools. For example, participants of Inquérito de 192617 had already made it clear that they were contrary to new Normal Schools in the state. Lourenço Filho18 and Fernando de Azevedo19, who succeeded Amadeu Mendes as General Directors of Public Instruction and Teaching General Director, respectively, established stricter conditions to restrict equivalence.
Through equivalence, several Non-Official Normal Schools were established in several towns - in new and old urban nuclei - with the validation of the teaching diploma. Equivalence changed completely the educational scenario of the state of São Paulo when it distanced itself from the state´s monopoly.
Non-Official Normal Schools underwent supervision by the state administration through Supervising Inspectors. According to the 1927 Reform, these institutions had to comply with several conditions so that equivalence could be conceded: they had to be established and maintained by Brazilian citizens; teaching staff should be composed of Brazilian teachers; courses and program had to comply with those of Official Normal Schools; they had to be implanted in towns without Official Normal Schools; the professor of Pedagogy and Didactics had to be selected by the state; they had to have a minimum sum of 200$ (SÃO PAULO, 1927).
The above conditions on requirements for equivalence of Non-Official Normal Schools revealed the control by the state administration on the functioning and pedagogical formation of the institutions. It seems that the professor of Pedagogy and Didactics, trained in Official Normal Schools, would receive a warrant by the administration. He had also to supervise that pedagogical formation would be as close as possible to that taught in Official Normal Schools.
The newspaper Correio Paulistano (1930, p. 5) demonstrated that professor Antônio d’Ávila belonged to the teaching staff of the Non-Official Normal School Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo as a teacher of Psychology, Didactics and Arts. Trevisan (2007, p. 25) says that Antônio d´Ávila was trained as teacher at the Normal School of São Paulo in 1920. He started his teaching career in the region of Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo, in 1921, gave lessons in several schools and had different incumbencies till he was appointed professor of the Non-Official Normal School of Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo.
In the case of the Non-Official Normal School of Sorocaba, Almeida (2015) shows that professor Renato Sêneca de Sá Fleury - formed at the Normal School of São Paulo in 1912 - participated in the establishment of the Municipal High School and the Non-Official Normal School of Sorocaba, where he taught Pedagogy, Psychology and Didactics and other subject matters for 14 years since the establishment of the school till his retirement in 1942. According to Messenberg (2012, p. 57-58), after the 1930 Revolution, Renato Fleury was exonerated from his incumbency at the Non-Official Normal School of Sorocaba by the mayor. In 1931, he sat for an entrance exam and became the Supervising Inspector of the same institution. In the wake of the Fernando de Azevedo reform in 1933, he became chief of the Education Sector and started giving lessons on Pedagogy, Psychology and Didactics.
Bruschi (2005) writes that professor Arcipestre Rugeri gave Pedagogy lessons in the Non-Official Normal School of Itápolis, in 1933. Information on the teacher was retrieved from the Livro Jubilar da Escola Normal da Capital, by João Lourenço Rodrigues (1930, p. 212), where he is shown to have been a student at the Normal School of Pirassununga in 1923. These facts reveal that conditions were complied with20.
Another measure demanded by the Reform was the impossibility of making equivalent two Non-Official Normal Schools with boarding or non-boarding regime in the same municipality. The equivalent schools had to make a deposit every six month at the State Income Tax Office of a sum of money for the yearly salaries of the Supervising Inspector and of the Pedagogy and Didactics teacher (SÃO PAULO, 1927).
Teachers with diplomas by the Non-Official Normal Schools were also controled. They could give lectures in a town school after teaching 200 days in rural schools and they could be teachers in primary schools after 200 days in town schools or 400 days in rural ones. Such requirement was not demanded of teachers with Official Normal School diplomas (SÃO PAULO, 1927). These rules not only hierarchized the diplomas, but it was an attempt to fulfill the suggestions of Amadeu Mendes to provide difficult-to-reach primary schools with formed teachers.
An item that should be underscored to understand the History of Teachers´ Formation is the poor physical and pedagogical conditions of the Normal Schools including the Official ones. There are references to monetary campaigns21 in several places to guarantee their maintenance and functioning. This fact has been made clear by Bruschi (2005) in his dissertation on the Non-Official Normal School of Itápolis and by Almeida (2015) in his thesis on the Non-Official Normal School of Sorocaba.
The control of Non-Official Normal Schools became stricter during the Amadeu Mendes administration. The 1929 Decree n. 4,600, which regulated the 1927 Reform, determined more rigorous conditions for equivalence to guarantee quality of teaching according to requirements of the General Director of Public Instruction.
The increase in the number of Non-Official Normal Schools was a source of concern for educators and legislators on education of quality. When Amadeu Mendes retired, professor Lourenço Filho (1930-1931) took over the General Directorate of Public Instruction and suspended the equalization of all Normal Non-Official Schools. According to Peres (1966, p. 14), during his administration, Lourenço Filho “revoked the equalization of the Non-Official Normal Schools to submit them to stricter and more efficient legal provisions, giving them an organization more consistent with the interests of teaching”.
Further, besides being submitted to inspection, Decree n. 4,794 of December 1930, determined that equalization of a Non-Official Normal School could be obtained when it was established and maintained by national or municipal associations; directed by Brazilians; complied with the programs of the Official Normal Schools; functioned on a premise with hygienic and pedagogical conditions; had adequate furniture, a Physics and Natural Science cabinet, specialized library and educational material; with an attached primary school course for pedagogical practice; paid the costs of the entrance exams and other examinations provided through government-appointed boards; had at least 15 students per class; so that classes may be authorized, 14:400$000 (fourteen contos and four hundred thousand reis) should be deposited in the state treasury to pay the supervising inspector (São Paulo, 1930).
Due to these stringent measures during the Lourenço Filho administration, some Non-Official Normal Schools had to close, although documents have not been found to evidence how the activities of these schools ceased. The Annuario de Ensino do estado de São Paulo (1935-1936) reports that only 48 of the 51 Non-Official Normal Schools 1930 requested teaching equalization. The request was conceded to 35 schools only.
The first batches of teachers of the Non-Official Normal Schools were formed in 1930. According to Rodrigues (1930, p. 316-317), the schools had trained 816 teachers, whereas the Official Normal Schools formed 1,167. Although the number of Official Normal Schools was smaller, they trained more teachers than the others during that specific year. This fact may have been the reason why lay teachers were exonerated during the Lourenço Filho administration by Decree n. 4,780 of November 28, 1930. The Annuario de Ensino do estado de São Paulo (1935-1936) reports that Lourenço Filho laid down approximately 1,044 lay teachers during his administration. Souza (2009, p. 187) states that
Within the context of rationalization and moralization of public service, the director exonerated all lay teachers (1,044 teachers) hired from 1927 onwards. He analyzed the location of the state’s vacant schools and made available public exams for graduate teachers. The measure caused great controversy and discontent among teachers, but was justified by the Director as an initiative taken in the good interest of teaching in order to eliminate anomalies, such as political interference with regard to the location of schools and on teacher appointments without any adaptation to the needs of the school system and the favoring of lay teachers to the detriment of qualified professionals.
On November 30, 1930, the O Estado de S. Paulo reported (p. 4) the dismissal of all lay teachers who had been admitted as an emergency measure by the 1927 Reform. “The Provisional Government yesterday decided to dismiss all lay teachers who were in charge of urban and rural schools in the state”.
In spite of educators´ concern and despite stricter measures to make equivalent Non-Official Normal Schools, their expansion occurred in the 1950s, when the expansion of Education Institutes in the state´s hinterland started by the end of 1951. Thus, the 1927 “emergency measure” continued for several decades. In fact, it was an opportunity for thousands of young people to study, especially in new urban centers where secondary schools were not available.
Non-Official Normal Schools and municipal participation
The demands for the establishment of public schools in several places in the early 20th century focused on teacher formation schools, besides the installation of primary ones (DINIZ; SOUZA, 2019, p. 98). Such claims may have contributed towards the institutions’ equalization. Consequently, municipalities were particularly keen in the process of the expansion of Normal Education. The particularities of each region will be investigated.
In Lins, a city in the western region of the state of São Paulo22, the newspaper O Linense23 (1928, p. 2) published a note on the establishment of the Non-Official Normal School of Lins on 14th May 1928:
We know that influential members of our community and prominent politicians are considering the establishment of a Non-Official Normal School, through the participation of the municipality.
The idea merits the highest praise since it is notoriously a need with significant effects. Our city has a privileged condition for such an endeavor, due to it being a unique center in the region, with important geographic expression.
When the authors of this great idea materialize such an entrepreneurship, they will be perpetually linked to the story of Lins, as benefactors. Our applauses are due to such a noble initiative and we hope that its materialization will occur in the very near future.
The above report in the newspaper O Linense builds up a narrative for the establishment of the Non-Official Normal School in Lins through the activities of the local administration. The Normal School meant progress in a region where development was incipient and schools and teachers had to be available for the growing population so that progress would reach its peak. The note also reveals that there were expectations for the establishment of the Non-Official Normal School of Lins. The institution was maintained by the municipality until 1938 when it was transferred to the Diocesan College as Non-Official Normal School Our Lady Help of Christians and became the high school´s women’s department. Municipal financial difficulties in maintaining the school triggered its transfer to the private sector.
There was no evidence in Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo on demands for the establishment of a Non-Official Normal School. Similar to other cities, the acknowledgement of its importance for cultural and economic development was manifested in the local newspapers. The Normal Non-Official School of Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo was installed by the municipal administrated in 1928 and its activities began in 1929. It was transformed into the Official Normal School of Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo on June 6, 1939. The Santa Cruz Jornal reported the graduation of the first batch of teachers of the Normal Non-Official School of Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo.
-“In current year, we will have the first batch of teachers”.
-“Fifteen young women will receive the diploma - the most honorable award in teaching in our city - raising the name of the school and disseminating what they have learned to other towns and cities.”
-“Why should not the Normal School be always the social heritage of our city, or rather, a nursery of young intelligent women that abound in the municipality?” (Ano I - nº 1, 29/05/19[31], p. 1, apud PRADO; SATO, 2013).
Although the note intimated some problem related to the continuity of the Normal School´s activities, no further information was found.
The municipal initiative in Bauru was also relevant for the establishment24 of the first institution of teacher formation in the city. In fact, in 1929, the municipality transferred the Non-Official Normal School Gomes Duarte to a private institution called Guedes de Azevedo High School. The institution became extinct and no documents are available for the 1920s and the 1930s in the Archives of the Teaching Directorate of Bauru that could give some hints on the issue25.
Clues and investigations on the history of other Non-Official Normal Schools in São Paulo make us hypothesize that the Normal Non-Official Schools of Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo, Lins and Bauru faced financial difficulties in maintenance and, consequently, they were transferred to the state and to private educational institutions. In fact, the municipalities already invested part of their resources in the acquisition of plots of land and in the construction of buildings for Isolated Schools and Primary Schools, as reported in several publications (Honorato; Nery, 2019, Diniz; Souza, 2019). Other municipalities maintained their municipal primary schools (Sandano, 2009). It may be the reason why certain municipalities had difficulty in maintaining specific institutions.
Other studies have shown the important role of the municipalities of São Paulo in the expansion of Normal Schools. The Mackenzie Non-Official Normal School in Araraquara was also established and maintained by the municipality for at least a decade. In 1926, the municipality took over the administration of a private college that was renamed Gymnasio Municipal Mackenzie de Araraquara. In 1928, the Normal School was established and attached to the high school. According to Antonio e Souza (2014), the date of its closure is uncertain but there are hints that the last year of its activities was in 1939.
The Non-Official Normal School of Itápolis was founded by Municipal Law n. 85, on August 30, 1929, and made equivalent to official normal schools in the same year. The local press enthusiastically reported the new institution that would benefit the population of the region and bring to Itápolis the warrant of cultural modernity.
The City Council announces the approval of the “relevant project of councilors Eugênio de Paula and Venâncio de Oliveira Machado”, authorizing the establishment of the Non-Official Normal School of Itápolis, under the immediate patronage of the City Council (O JORNAL DE ITÁPOLIS, 17/08/1929, p. 2, apud BRUSCHI, 2005, p. 53).
According to Bruschi (2005), in spite of the difficulties and interruptions of activities, the Non-Official Normal School of Itápolis was maintained by the municipality until 1947, when it was made official by the state government.
Research by Lima (2005), Sandano (2009) and Almeida (2015) on the Non-Official Normal School of Sorocaba shows that, since the early years of the 20th century, the population of the city demanded the establishment of a teacher training college to meet local needs. However, the installation of the Normal School was only achieved with the 1927 Reform by municipal initiative. Although the institution experienced serious difficulties listed by Almeida (2015) such as adapted premises, lack of laboratories necessary for teacher training according to the legislation and financial difficulties, it functioned from 1929 to 1967, maintained by the municipality. In fact, in 1967, it was transformed into a Municipal Educational Institute Dr. Getúlio Vargas. The local press reported the installation of the Normal Non-Official School of Sorocaba with enthusiasm.
Three relevant improvements to Sorocaba - Due to the efforts of traditional politicians who appropriately took over the administration of Sorocaba and through the goodwill of the people who supported the noble initiatives of the directory, our city, which has always had the great advantage of a Municipal High School, in full and constant progress, will soon count with two relevant improvements, namely, the Non-Official Normal School and the Professional School. The Non-Official Normal School, which will function in consonance with the High School, will start its activities on February 1st of next year. In due course, registration for the entrance exam will be announced. Duly authorized by the directory, we may inform interested parties that it is advisable to start preparing candidates so that they would have time to sit for the exam and, consequently, may contact Mr. João Machado de Araújo, the worthy director of the High School. As soon as our municipal councilors take office, the High School and the Normal School will be transferred to the municipal administration. They will be warranted by the state administration (JORNAL CORREIO DE SOROCABA, 11/11/1928, apud ALMEIDA, 2015, p. 71-72).
Sorocaba may be underscored for its significant municipal investment in secondary education through High School and the Non-Official Normal School.
Other research works on Non-Official Normal Schools maintained by particular associations or religious orders evidence the requirements to establish properly equivalent Normal Schools in several cities. However, it is important to elucidate the role of municipalities in the process of expansion of Normal Education that, although certain schools were established and maintained by private associations or religious orders26, it is not possible to exclude the partial involvement of the municipal administration in their establishment and maintenance.
The local press in Ribeirão Preto, in a highly developed region in the state of São Paulo, published this note:
Ribeirão Preto is the only city in the hinterland where it is absolutely urgent to establish a normal school for several reasons we have already brought forward and which cannot reasonably be contested. In spite of its urgency, the government has always refused this small benefit to the municipality which most contributes towards the state’s budget (JORNAL “A CIDADE”, 09/10/1911, p.1, apud FURTADO, 2007, p. 70).
In spite of such demands, the first Normal School was only installed in 1928 by the Teaching Association of Ribeirão Preto27, and, whilst the second institution was established in 1930, attached to the Santa Ursula College, maintained by the French Congregation of Ursuline Sisters (a Catholic religious order). According to Furtado (2007), all these institutions were private. The former was a comprehensive school and the latter catered for the education of girls.
Nascimento (2016, p. 55) says that since 1914, Santos, another developed region, was discussing the establishment of an Official Normal School. However, due to the absence of an official institution, Non-Official Normal Schools were responsible for teacher training in the region. They comprised the Santista Female High School, established in 1902 by the Female Association of Beneficence and Instruction28 and by the Non-Official Normal School of Santos, established and maintained by the José Bonifácio Instruction Association, in 1928.
According to Nascimento (2016, p. 48), the establishment of the José Bonifácio Instruction Association, which maintained the Normal Non-Official School in Santos, was attached to the former School of Commerce (1907-1917) founded and maintained by the city of Santos. Despite the demise of the School of Commerce, Resolution n. 159 of the city council (1917) demonstrates funding of the Non-Official Normal School of Santos by the municipality.
In his Dissertation on the Liceu Feminino Santista, Campos (2018) confirms that the Liceu was the first teacher formation institution in Santos, founded in 1902. The Female Association for Beneficence and Instruction also founded and maintained maternal schools for underprivileged children and the Liceu Feminino was focused on women’s education and teacher training for the above-mentioned schools, due to the city´s lack of teachers. The Female High School also received municipal and state funds for its maintenance. It not only admitted poor students but also children and young people of the elite society due to its prestige (p. 41). Owing to financial difficulties, gratuity was maintained till 1930, when it started to charge tuition fees and tuition of families who were able to pay for their daughters’ education. Equalization of the Liceu Feminino Santista to the Normal School of São Paulo was first requested to the state Assembly in 1905. According to the author, the equivalence was not obtained after the 1927 Reform. Legislation maintained that only one Non-Official Normal School could be equated in each municipality under the boarding school or external regimes. The Non-Official Normal School of Santos, established and maintained by the José Bonifácio Instructional Association, had already obtained equivalence during that period. Although High School students could teach in the municipal schools of Santos, enrollment decreased and teacher training was closed in 1939 since the institution was not made equivalent29.
The establishment of the 1927 Reform at the start of 1928, conceded equivalence to 26 Non-Official Normal Schools - 2 schools in the capital city and 24 schools in the interior of the state -surpassing the number of Official Normal Schools. Eight and four Non-Official Normal Schools were made equivalent respectively in 1929 and in 1930. The state now totaled 48 Normal Schools - 10 Official Normal Schools and 38 Non-Official Normal Schools30. Table 1 presents a survey of municipal Non-Official Normal Schools established between 1928 and 1930, a result of current research31.
Table 1 Municipal Non-Official Normal Schools in the state of São Paulo (1928-1930)
Municipal Non-Official Normal Schools established in the period (1928-1930) | |
---|---|
School/Town or City | Information/Data |
Non-Official Normal School of the Liceu Rio Branco in Catanduva | - Municipal Law n. 157, of 9th June 1928 - Transformed into Official Normal School in 1939 by Decree n. 10,317. |
Non-Official Normal School of Tietê | - Established by Law 112, by the mayor of Tietê, Delphino Martins Bonilha, and approved by the Municipal Council on 2nd January 1928. - Officially established on 31/03/1928 by the mayor - Transformed into Official Normal School in 1939. |
Non-Official Normal School of Taquaritinga |
- Established on 4/10/1928 by a private association and later passed to the Municipality. - On 9/07/1945 it was transformed into a Normal School and High School of Taquaritinga. |
Non-Official Normal School of Gomes Duarte of Bauru | - Established by the municipality of Bauru; - Transferred on 13/05/1928 into Ginásio Guedes de Azevedo (private) |
Municipal Non-Official Normal School of Mirassol | - Established by Municipal Decree n.62 on 1/12/1928; - Made equivalent on 3/01/1929. |
Non-Official Normal School of Franca | - Established on 15/01/1928 by the mayor Major Torquato Caleiro; - Made equivalent on 20/02/1928. - Made Official Normal School in 1941 by State decree n. 11,839 of February 7th. |
Non-Official Normal School of São Simão | - Established by the municipality of São Simão - Made equivalent on 20/02/1928. |
Non-Official Normal School of Taubaté | - Established in 1929 by Municipal Decree n. 262 of 7/12/1929; - Transformed into Official Normal School in 1945; |
Municipal Non-Official Normal School of Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo | - Established by the municipality in 1929; - Transformed into Official Normal School by Decree n. 10,336 of 21/06/1939; - current Escola Estadual Leônidas do Amaral Vieira. |
Municipal Non-Official Normal School of Lins | - Established in 1929; - Annexed to the Diocesan College in 1938 and called Escola Normal Livre N. S. Auxiliadora; - current Colégio N. S. Auxiliadora. |
Municipal Non-Official Normal School of Itápolis |
- Established by Municipal Decree n, 85 of 30/10/1929. |
Municipal Non-Official Normal School of Sorocaba | - Established by Municipal Decree n. 209 of 16/01/1929. |
Municipal Non-Official Normal School of S. José dos Campos | - Established on February 1930. |
Municipal Non-Official Normal School of Moji das Cruzes | - Reopened on 27/03/1939, although establishment occurred in 1930. |
Sources: Table was prepared with data retrieved from Poliantéia Comemorativa do Primeiro Centenário do Ensino Normal do estado de São Paulo (1946); O Ensino Secundário e Normal do Estado de São Paulo (1949); and Mascaro (1956).
The table above shows that municipal initiatives on the establishment of Non-Official Normal Schools were significant in the regions of Paraíba Valley (Mogi das Cruzes, São José dos Campos and Taubaté), North (Itápolis, Mirassol, Franca, São Simão) and the western region with new urban centers.
Final considerations
The 1927 Reform triggered the expansion of the Normal School Education to disseminate primary education. In other words, beneath the project to expand the Normal Schools, another project to disseminate primary schools was also endeavored, which, consequently, brought progress to the new urban centers. It is important to highlight that the dissemination of Normal Schools in the hinterland of the state of São Paulo was an opportunity for several young people to expand their studies and obtain a profession. Normal Schools admitted students from poor families, who sought social promotion, and students from wealthy families, who also sought intellectual training.
Research analyses on Non-Official Normal Schools in the state of São Paulo raised several issues on the process of expansion of Normal School. The establishment of Official and Non-Official Normal Schools seems intertwined, due to relationship and political interests, with the articulation between local leaders and state authorities, and due to the needs and demands of the schooling population. Consequently, Tanuri’s insistence (1979) that the expansion process of normal schools has been accelerated and disorganized is highly pertinent.
It should be highlighted that the expansion process was not homogeneous in all regions of the state and the cultural, economic and demographic characteristics have to be carefully considered. The dissemination of Normal Schools may have taken different paths among urbanized regions (with old and populous cities) and regions still within the population settlement process (new urban centers).
In the wake of such transformations in the education situation of the state of São Paulo, it is important to emphasize that it was a unique moment for the dissemination of Normal Schools when the state monopoly was ruptured and the municipal and private initiative took the lead. During this third moment in the expansion of teacher formation, municipal initiatives played a fundamental role when they established Non-Official Normal Schools, even if, initially, they were frequently not successful. Another issue that need be highlighted is the interest by municipal councils and administrators to provide schools with properly trained teachers through Official or Non-Official Normal Schools.
In the wake of the impossibility of expanding Normal Schools at the same level as existing ones, the reformers maintained only the superiority of the Normal School of the capital city, reduce all the others and open the way to the municipal and private initiative so that they would contribute, voluntarily or involuntarily, to the expansion of Normal Schools. Since lay teachers were removed in 1930, this fact shows that partially the 1927 Reform began to reap several rewards. We would also like to emphasize that the Reform permitted several municipalities to have a Secondary School, since few were extent in the state of São Paulo.
REFERENCES
ALMEIDA, Adriana R. da Mota. Entre o monumento idealizado e o realizado: a Escola Normal Livre Municipal de Sorocaba (1929 a 1967). 2015. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Universidade de Sorocaba, Sorocaba, 2015. [ Links ]
ALMEIDA, Jane Soares de. A formação de professores em São Paulo (1846-1996): a prática do ensino em questão. Campinas: Autores Associados, 2016. [ Links ]
ANTONIO, M. R. S.; SOUZA, R. F. O Ginásio Municipal e a formação de professores: a Escola Normal Livre Mackenzie de Araraquara (1928-1939). In: SOUZA, R. F.; VALDEMARIN, V. T.; ZANCUL, M. C. S. (Org.). O Ginásio da Morada do Sol: história e memória da Escola Estadual Bento de Abreu de Araraquara. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2014, p. 92-103. [ Links ]
AZEVEDO, Fernando de. A educação na encruzilhada. São Paulo: Melhoramentos, 1937. [ Links ]
BRUSCHI, Veralúcia Romanini. A Escola Normal Livre de Itápolis: vozes e imagens (1930-1960). 2005. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Centro Universitário Moura Lacerda, Ribeirão Preto, 2005. [ Links ]
CAMPOS, Angela B. M. B. de. O curso Normal do Liceu Feminino Santista: a longa busca pela equiparação. 2018. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Universidade Católica de Santos, Santos, 2018. [ Links ]
CARVALHO, Marta Maria Chagas de. A Escola e A República e outros ensaios. 1. ed. Bragança Paulista: EDUSF, 2003. [ Links ]
CATANI, Denice Barbara. Educadores à meia-luz. Bragança Paulista: Editora da Universidade São Francisco, 2002. v. 1. [ Links ]
CHARTIER, Roger. História Cultural entre práticas e representações. Rio de Janeiro: Berltrand, 1990. [ Links ]
CORREIO PAULISTANO. O desenvolvimento da instrução na alta Sorocabana. São Paulo, 16 maio 1930, p. 5. [ Links ]
DINIZ, Carlos Alberto; SOUZA Rosa Fátima de. A colaboração dos municípios na expansão do ensino secundário no estado de São Paulo (1930-1964). In: Cadernos de História da Educação, v.18, n.1, p.93-121, jan./abr. 2019. Disponível em: http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/che/article/view/47620/25731. Acessado em 03 jun. 2019. https://doi.org/10.14393/che-v18n1-2019-6 [ Links ]
FURTADO, Alessandra C. Por uma história das práticas de formação docente: um estudo comparado entre duas escolas normais de Ribeirão Preto/SP (1944-1964). 2007. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2007. [ Links ]
HONORATO, Tony; Nery, Ana Clara Bortoleto. The normal school of Piracicaba as a memory place of the republican regime in Brazil. In: History of education & children's literature, v. XIV, p. 163-182, 2019. Disponível em: http://www.hecl.it/. Acessado em 26 set. 2019. [ Links ]
INOUE, Leila Maria. Entre Livres e Oficiais: a expansão do Ensino Normal em São Paulo (1927-1933). 2015. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Universidade Estadual Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Marília, 2015. [ Links ]
LABEGALINI, Andreia C. F. B. A formação de professores nos Institutos de Educação de São Paulo (1933 a 1945). 2005. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Marília, 2005. [ Links ]
LIMA, Ana Lúcia de Almeida. A educação em Sorocaba - do final do século XIX até a criação da Escola Normal Livre de Sorocaba em 1929. 2005. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Universidade de Sorocaba, Sorocaba, 2005. [ Links ]
LINS. Lei Municipal nº 67, de 25 de janeiro de 1929. Atas da Câmara Municipal. Lins, 1929. [Manuscrito não paginado] [ Links ]
MASCARO, Carlos Corrêa. O Ensino Normal no Estado de São Paulo: subsídios para estudos da sua reforma. São Paulo: Secção de Publicação da Universidade de São Paulo,1956. [ Links ]
MENDES, Amadeu. Relatório: apresentado ao Secretário do Interior Dr. Fabio de Sá Barreto (1927-1928). São Paulo: Irmão Ferraz, 1929. [ Links ]
MESSENBERG, Cyntia Grizzo. A série Na roça, de Renato S. Fleury, na história do ensino da leitura no Brasil. 2012. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Universidade Estadual Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Marília, 2012. [ Links ]
MONARCHA, Carlos. Escola Normal da Praça: o lado noturno das luzes. Campinas: Editora UNICAMP, 1999. [ Links ]
NASCIMENTO, Lúcia Tavares. A Escola Normal Livre de Santos: uma realização da Associação Instrutiva José Bonifácio. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação). Universidade Católica de Santos, Santos, 2016. [ Links ]
NERY, Ana Clara B. A Sociedade de Educação de São Paulo: embates no campo educacional (1922-1931). São Paulo: Editora Unesp. 2009. https://doi.org/10.7476/9788539304509 [ Links ]
O ENSINO SECUNDÁRIO E NORMAL DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO (1949). São Paulo: Instituto de Administração da Faculdade de Ciências Econômica e Administrativas da Universidade de São Paulo, 1949. [ Links ]
O ESTADO DE S. PAULO. Dispensa dos professores leigos. São Paulo, 30 nov. 1930, p. 4. [ Links ]
O LINENSE. Nota sobre a Escola Normal Livre de Lins. Lins, 14 maio 1928, p. 1. [ Links ]
PERES, Tirsa Regazzini. O advento da Escola Normal Livre e seus resultados comparados com os da Normal Oficial (1927-1930). Araraquara, 1966. Mimeo. [ Links ]
PRADO, Celso; SATO, Junko. Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo: memórias, documentos e referências. 2013. Disponível em: <http://satoprado.ebook.blogspot.com.br/2013/07/escolas-pioneiras.html>. Acesso em: 05 jun. 2019. [ Links ]
RODRIGUES, João Lourenço. Livro Jubilar da Escola Normal da Capital: contendo a relação completa de diplomados de todos os institutos congêneres do Estado de São Paulo (1897-1929). São Paulo: Instituto D. Ana Rosa, 1930. [ Links ]
SANDANO, Wilson. A criação da Escola Normal Livre de Sorocaba. Série-Estudos - Periódico do Mestrado em Educação da UCDB. Campo Grande, n. 28, p. 75-87, jul./dez. 2009. Disponível em: http://www.serie-estudos.ucdb.br/index.php/serie-estudos/article/view File/177/264. Acesso em: 25 maio. 2019. [ Links ]
SANTA CRUZ DO RIO PARDO. Lei Municipal n. 429, de 25 de agosto de 1928. Ata da Câmara Municipal, Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo, 1928. [Manuscrito não paginado] [ Links ]
SÃO PAULO. Annuário do Ensino do estado de São Paulo. São Paulo: Augusto Siqueira & C., 1918. [ Links ]
SÃO PAULO. Decreto n. 2269, de 31 de dezembro de 1927. Disponível em: <http://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/lei/1927/lei-2269-31.12.1927.html>. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2019. [ Links ]
SÃO PAULO. Decreto nº 4. 600, 30 de maio de 1929. Disponível em: https://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/decreto/1929/decreto-4600-30.05.1929.html. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2019. [ Links ]
SÃO PAULO. Decreto nº 4.794, de 17 de dezembro de 1930. Disponível em: <http://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/decreto/1930/decreto-4794-17.12.1930.html>. Acesso em: 28 jun. 2019. [ Links ]
SÃO PAULO. Annuario do Ensino do estado de São Paulo. São Paulo: Typographia do Diário Official, 1935-1936. [ Links ]
SÃO PAULO. Poliantéia Comemorativa do Primeiro Centenário do Ensino Normal do estado de São Paulo. São Paulo: Gráfica Bréscia,1946. [ Links ]
SOUZA, Rosa Fátima de. Alicerces da Pátria: história da escola primária no estado de São Paulo (1890 - 1976). Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2009. [ Links ]
TANURI, Leonor Maria. A Escola Normal no Estado de São Paulo no período da Primeira República: contribuições para o estudo de sua estrutura Didática. 1973. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Unesp, Marília, 1973. [ Links ]
TANURI, Leonor Maria. O Ensino Normal no Estado de São Paulo (1890-1930). São Paulo: FEUSP, 1979. [ Links ]
TREVISAN, Thabatha Aline. A Pedagogia por meio da Pedagogia: Teoria e Prática (1954), de Antonio d’ Ávila. 2007. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Unesp-Marília. 2007. [ Links ]
2Parts of this paper were the result of a doctoral research in Education undertaken by Leila Maria Inoue, within the Postgraduate Program in Education within the theme History and Philosophy of Brazilian Education of UNESP - campus Marília. Title of the thesis was Entre Livres e Oficiais: a expansão do Ensino Normal em São Paulo: 1927-1933, supervised by Dr Ana Clara Bortoleto Nery, with viva voce in 2015.
3The term “non-official” denotes non state schools. It was applied to municipal and private schools. At that time, municipalities were not federal units and were not responsible for official education. They needed the approval of the state. Research demonstrated the existence of institutions called Non-official Normal Schools and Non-Official Complementary Schools.
4Amadeu Mendes graduated from the Normal School of Itapetininga in 1899. According to Nery (2009, p. 104-105), he came from government-run teaching of São Paulo and for many years was the director of the Ginásio de Campinas. During his administration, one of his concerns was to maintain communication channels and the dissemination of activities by General Directorate of Public Instruction. Thus, the Revista Escolar was restructured and renamed Education. The Anuário de Ensino was replaced by Reports during his administration.
5Other reforms in public education in São Paulo between 1920 and 1925 also determined the payment of yearly enrollment fees in Official Normal Schools and Complementary Schools.
6Equalization was a new measure in the legislation of the state of São Paulo. However, it was already employed in other Brazilian states, such as in Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Bahia, Pernambuco and Rio Grande do Sul (TANURI, 1979, p. 186).
7According to data, it was only in 1938, after 14 years have passed since the establishment of the last Normal School in São Paulo, the Normal School of Mococa was founded, under the aegis of the state.
9Law n. 88, published on 8th September 1892, and Decree n. 144-B, published on 30the December 1892, had already regulated the exercise of private initiative in the education sector of São Paulo.
10Several teacher formation schools were established in the state of São Paulo without due acknowledgement, such as the Liceu Feminino Santista (1902) in Santos. Messenberg (2012) informs, without much details, the existence of a Escola Normal Masculina in Sorocaba, where Renato Sêneca de Sá Fleury lectured in 1913. The Anuário de Ensino do estado de São Paulo of 1918 also reveals, with scanty details, the existence of the Externato Normal in São Paulo, at Rua Amaral Gurgel, 22; the Externato Normal in Itapetininga and the Collegio Normal in Santa Rita.
11Several researchers who try to exploit this metaphor are: Denice Barbara Catani in her thesis Educadores à meia-luz (1989) and Carlos Roberto Monarcha in his thesis Escola Normal da Praça: o lado noturno das luzes (1994), both published in book form, respectively, in 2002 and 1999.
12As in the report by Amadeu Mendes (1929).
14Reduction did not affect Escola Normal da Capital, which remained with its organized structure during 5 years, established in 1925 by the Reform Pedro Voss. Teachers who graduated in these institutions had several privileges, such as, preference for appointments as headmasters of Primary, Professional and Secondary Normal Schools, professors of Complementary and Normal Schools and Teaching Inspectors. According to Almeida (2016, p. 104), such measures introduced double formations in state teachers.
15According to Tanuri (1979, p. 187), appointment of lay teachers was not employed in the state since the mid-1910s when it was reintroduced in 1925.
16The Normal School of São Paulo (a.k.a. Normal School of the Square); Normal School of Itapetininga; Normal School of Piracicaba; Normal School of Campinas; Normal School of Guaratinguetá; Normal School of Pirassununga; Normal School of Botucatu; Normal School of São Carlos; Normal School of Casa Branca; Normal School of Braz (in the capital city).
20Several studies in current paper mention the teachers in Pedagogy and Didactics, but up to the writing of the paper, we had no more information about them.
21Although funding to help educational institutions is carried out up to the present, in current paper we are seeking data on the Non-Official Normal Schools, especially the municipal ones, created between 1927 and 1933.
22Non-Official Normal Schools of the western region of the state of São Paulo have been studied in a thesis titled Entre Livre e Oficiais: a expansão do Ensino Normal em São Paulo (1927-1933).
25The archives of the Education Director of Bauru were consulted during research work for the doctoral thesis in Education between 2011 and 2014, resulting in Entre Livres e Oficiais: a expansão do Ensino Normal em São Paulo (1927-1933).
28The associated was founded in 1902 by educator Anália Franco and by the Normal School teacher Eunice Caldas, and coordinated by a team of ladies from the economic and political elite of Santos. The Association basically assisted needy people, maintained by donations of members and by subsidies from the municipality and state.
30No Official Normal School was established during this period. See survey by Inoue (2015).
31We do not intend to list all the municipal Non-Official Normal Schools, but to impart information collected during years of research. Due to the lack of official sources and scientific work, some data in Table 1 were confirmed in almanacs (online) or memorial blogs aiming at the reconstruction of the history of respective cities of São Paulo and in news available online.
Received: April 16, 2020; Accepted: July 20, 2020