INTRODUCTION
Mental health preservation is an essential condition for university students, independently of their chosen career1. However, medical students constitute a target group, as they are subject to lower psychological and social well-being when compared to other people of same age2. Studies on the matter become even more relevant as they involve future physicians who will care for the health of others, besides health benefits for the professionals themselves. Some authors have shown that physicians with depressive disorders have a higher propensity to committing errors in their professional practice3,4.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO)5, depression is a condition characterized by symptoms of prolonged sadness, inability to take pleasure in former interests, feelings of guilt, worthlessness, significant changes in appetite and sleep patterns, loss of energy, and/or inability to concentrate, among others. Depression may shown continuous progression or be recurring and, in some cases be so severe as to lead to suicide. The WHO5 also defines anxiety disorders as conditions related to feelings of anguish and fear, including generalized anxiety disorder, panic syndrome, phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress.
Although the topic of mental health among medical students has been covered by important publications in the literature, both national6 and international7,8, most of these publications focus on prevalence estimates. Therefore, there is a lack of consistent information regarding factors related to these problems.
Utilizing an instrument (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - HADS) with a good performance history when used in the general population9, the present study aimed to contribute to a better understanding of medical students’ mental health, broadening the analysis to the predisposing factors. Hence, the objectives were (a) to estimate the prevalence of indicative scores for anxiety, depression, and for simultaneous anxiety and depression, and (b) to analyze factors associated with these conditions in medical students at a federal university in Brazil.
METHODS
This study was developed at the medical school of a federal university in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In this institution, the medical training is based on a theoretical-demonstrative and a practical-conceptual program of progressive complexity, lasting four years, and followed by two years of medical internship. The workload comprises 9,135 hours.
Participants
Candidates to the study were students enrolled in the medical program (n = 924) who, at the time of data collection, were regularly attending classes and/or active in the medical internship program. Students involved in the research project or who were part of the data collecting team were excluded from the study (n = 4).
Study Sample
The study sample was calculated considering two objectives separately. Firstly, to obtain prevalence rates in the whole student group, we considered anxiety prevalence of 15%, an error of up to ten percentage points, and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Secondly, to compare the two groups (one with and the other without the outcome) and to get prevalence ratios, we considered the same prevalence rate (15%), study power of 80%, risk of 2.0 and alpha error of 5% (95% confidence interval - 95% CI). The minimum sample size was estimated at 162 and 266 students, respectively. After a convenient selection of participants, the study population consisted of 355 students: 218 females, 134 males, and 3 who did not identify their gender.
Design and Data Collection
Data collection was carried out in the classrooms, over the first semester of 2015, from March until June. Students who were not present or who chose to respond at a later time used the online version via Google Forms. Socio-demographic characteristics and structured and semi-structured questions of interest to the study were answered by the participants themselves.
Study Variables
Dependent variables were individually analyzed, considering indicative scores of: Anxiety (yes/no); Depression (yes/no); and Anxiety and Depression simultaneously (yes/no). This classification was obtained through the administration of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). This instrument was developed by Zigmond and Snaith10 and has a long usage history. The first validation studies11,12in Brazil were implemented in the 1990s. The tool consists of 14 items, seven of which are used to assess depression and seven to assess anxiety. The items for assessing anxiety cover the following questions: (i) to feel tensed or “wound up”; (ii) to feel interested in things as one used to; (iii) to feel something awful is about to happen; (iv) to laugh readily and see the funny side of things; (v) to worry a lot; (vi) to feel cheerful; (vii) to sit at ease and feel relaxed. The items for assessing depression include the following questions: (i) to feel slowed down; (ii) to get a frightened feeling like butterflies in the stomach; (iii) to lose interest in one’s appearance; (iv) to feel restless; (v) to feel optimistic about the future; (vi) to have panic attacks; (vii) to enjoy a good book or radio or TV program.
Anxiety and Depression Scoring
Points for items in each HADS subscale are based on a Likert scale, with a variation from zero to three, and sum of zero to twenty-one. HADS allows individuals’ classification as: without depression and/or anxiety (≤ 7), borderline for depression and/or anxiety (8 to 10), and with depression and/or anxiety (≥ 11). Students in which the sum of points in the scale (≥ 11) indicated the problem (Anxiety, Depression, or Anxiety and Depression) were classified as ‘yes.’ Bordering or negative situations were classified as ‘no.’ Here, we have also classified the students with both conditions concurrently, verifying whether the sum of points for depression and for anxiety reached ≥ 11. Otherwise, the concurrence of both situations was considered as being absent.
Independent variables
Independent variables were: gender (female or male), age (18 to 21 years; 22 to 27 years; 28 or older), medical course stage (basic, clinical, or medical internship), feeling alone (yes/no), having a history of psychological and/or psychiatric treatment (never, started during the course, started before the course), person(s) the student was living with (family, friends, alone), family history of anxiety and/or depression (no case, anxiety case, depression case, or both), and feeling morally harmed at the college (yes/no). In case of a positive answer to the last question, another question was addressed to clarify the causative agent (student, professor, or both).
Data Analysis
The prevalence of depression and anxiety as well as 95% confidence intervals were calculated. As depression and anxiety appeared frequently, Poisson regression with robust variance estimator was employed to estimate the prevalence ratio - PR - (unadjusted and adjusted), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). That way, we avoided overestimation of effects between dependent and independent variables.
Ethical Aspects
This study follows the recommendations for research in humans, as stated in Resolution Number 466 of 12 December 2012, and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of our institution (Finding #912.412, dated 06 November 2014). All participants were invited, properly informed about, and included in the study only after signing an informed consent form.
RESULTS
Potential participants were 373 students attending classes or doing medical internship activities. Eighteen students (12 women and 6 men) refused to participate or did not answer the questionnaire. All of them were doing medical internship activities. The non-response rate was of 4.8%. Thus, 355 students were analyzed, with a higher proportion of female students (61.93% versus 38.07%) compared with male students. Mean age was 23.06 years (standard deviation 3.10 years). There was no significant difference in mean age between males (22.87 years) and females (23.18 years).
The use of HADS showed students had anxiety (41.4%; 95% CI: 36.3%; 46.6%), depression (8.2%; 95% CI: 5.3%; 11.0%) and both depression and anxiety (7.0%; 95% CI: 4.4%; 9.7%).
With the exception of the gender variable (female), which showed a statistically significant difference only for ‘anxiety,’ a pattern of risk factors with p-values <0.05 (feeling alone, having a history of psychiatric/psychological treatment, and feeling morally harmed) was identified for all three analyzed outcomes. The students’ characteristics according to mental health status are summarized in Table 1.
#Anxiety (41.4%) | #Depression (8.2%) | #Anxiety and Depression (7.0%) | |||||
Variable | n (%) | p value | n(%) | p value | n (%) | p value | Total |
Gender | 0.002 | 0.789 | 0.621 | ||||
Female | 104 (47.4) | 18 (8.3) | 16 (7.3) | 218 | |||
Male | 42 (31.3) | 10 (7.5) | 8 (6.0) | 134 | |||
Age (years) | 0.186 | 0.063 | 0.137 | ||||
18-21 | 43 (38.7) | 6 (5.4) | 5 (4.5) | 111 | |||
22-27 | 81 (39.7) | 16 (7.8) | 14 (6.9) | 204 | |||
≥ 28 | 15 (10.8) | 5 (19.2) | 4 (15.4) | 26 | |||
Medical school stage | 0.674 | 0.297 | 0.444 | ||||
Basic (first and second years) | 56 (39.4) | 8 (5.6) | 7 (4.9) | 142 | |||
Clinical (third and fourth years) | 62 (44.3) | 15 (10.7) | 12 (8.6) | 140 | |||
Internship (fifth and sixth years) | 29 (39.7) | 6 (8.2) | 6 (8.2) | 73 | |||
Feeling alone | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||
Yes | 94 (54,0) | 26 (14.9) | 23 (13.2) | 174 | |||
No | 52 (29.0) | 3 (1.7) | 2 (1.1) | 179 | |||
History of mental health treatment | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||
Never before | 65 (30.9) | 7 (3.3) | 5 (2.4) | 210 | |||
During medical training | 51 (54.3) | 12 (12.8) | 11 (11.7) | 94 | |||
Previous to medical training | 31 (60.8) | 10 (19.6) | 9 (17.6) | 51 | |||
Person (s) the student is living with | 0.710 | 0.645 | 0.771 | ||||
Family | 51 (39.1) | 9 (6.8) | 9 (6.8) | 133 | |||
Friend | 68 (43.9) | 13 (8.4) | 10 (6.4) | 155 | |||
Alone | 27 (40.9) | 7 (10.6) | 6 (9.1) | 66 | |||
Family history of mental health problems | 0.066 | 0.809 | 0.997 | ||||
Negative history | 44 (33.8) | 10 (7.7) | 9 (6.9) | 130 | |||
Anxiety | 23 (53.5) | 3 (7.0) | 3 (7.0) | 43 | |||
Depression | 29 (39.7) | 5 (6.8) | 5 (6.8) | 73 | |||
Both anxiety and depression | 50 (47.2) | 11 (10.4) | 8 (7.5) | 106 | |||
Feeling morally harmed | < 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.011 | ||||
Yes | 93 (55.7) | 21 (12.6) | 18 (10.8) | 167 | |||
No | 53 (28.6) | 8 (4.3) | 7 (3.8) | 185 | |||
Causative agent | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.002 | ||||
Negative history | 53 (28.8) | 8 (4.3) | 7 (3.8) | 184 | |||
Students | 13 (52.0) | 1 (4.0) | 0 (0.0) | 25 | |||
Teachers | 43 (55.1) | 8 (10.3) | 8 (10.3) | 78 | |||
Both Students and teachers | 35 (60.3) | 12 (20.7) | 10 (17.2) | 58 |
#Zigmond and Snaith [10]. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67(6):361-70. Available for textual search at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
In the bivariate analysis, while the category ‘female gender’ increased the risk in more than 50% just for anxiety when compared to ‘male gender,’ the category ‘age = 28 years or more’ increased in 2.5 times the risk just for depression compared to the 18-21 year range. The risk pattern for ‘feeling alone,’ ‘having a history of psychiatric/psychological treatment,’ and ‘feeling morally harmed’ was maintained for all three analyzed outcomes (Table 2).
#Anxiety | #Depression | #Anxiety and Depression | |
Variable | Unadjusted PR* and 95% CI** | Unadjusted PR* and 95% CI** | Unadjusted PR* and 95% CI** |
Gender | |||
Female | 1.52 (1.063; 2.177) | 1.10 (0.510; 2.396) | 1.22 (0.526; 2.872) |
Male | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
Age (years) | |||
18-21 | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
22-27 | 1.02 ( 0.708; 1.483) | 1.45 (0.567; 3.708) | 1.52 (0.548; 4.229) |
≥28 | 1.48 (0.827; 2.680) | 3.55 (1.085; 11.657) | 3.41 (0.917; 12.718) |
Medical school stage | |||
Basic (first and second years) | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
Clinical (third and fourth years) | 1.12 (0.782; 1.611) | 1.90 (0.806; 4.485) | 1.73 (0.684; 4.416) |
Internship (fifth and sixth years) | 1.00 (0.643; 1.577) | 1.45 (0.506; 4.204) | 1.66 (0.560; 4.961) |
Feeling alone | |||
Yes | 1.85 (1.325; 2.609) | 8.91 (2.698; 29.456) | 11.83 (2.789; 50.178) |
No | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
History of mental health treatment | |||
Never before | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
During medical training | 1.75 (1.214; 2.529) | 3.82 (1.507; 9.727) | 4.91 (1.707; 14.145) |
Prior to medical training | 1.96 (1.280; 3.012) | 5.88 (2.239; 15.453) | 7.41 (2.483; 22.115) |
Person (s) the student is living with | |||
Family | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
Friends | 1.12 (0.782; 1.610) | 1.23 (0.529; 2.899) | 0.95 (0.387; 2.346) |
Alone | 1.04 (0.657; 1.665) | 1.56 (0.583; 4.208) | 1.34 (0.478; 3.774) |
Family history of mental health problems | |||
Negative history | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
Anxiety | 1.58 (0.954; 2.616) | 0.90 (0.249; 3.295) | 1.00 (0.272; 3.722) |
Depression | 1.17 (0.734; 1.875) | 0.89 (0.304; 2.605) | 0.98 (0.331; 2.952) |
Both anxiety and depression | 1.39 (0.929; 2.089) | 1.34 (0.572; 3.176) | 1.09 (0.420; 2.825) |
Feeling morally harmed | |||
Yes | 1.94 (1.387; 2.723) | 2.90 (1.288; 6.565) | 2.84 (1.189; 6.820) |
No | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
*Unadjusted prevalence ratio; **95% confidence intervals; ***ref (reference: unexposed or lower exposed category); #Zigmond and Snaith [10]. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67(6):361-70. Available for textual search at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
Having a ‘history of psychiatric/psychological treatment before entering the university’, ‘loneliness,’ and ‘feeling morally harmed at the college’ were the main factors associated with mental disorders, after adjustment of multivariate models, adjusted for gender and age (Table 3).
Final Model of #Anxiety | Final Model of #Depression | Final Model of #Depression and Anxiety | |
Variable | Adjusted PR* and 95% CI** | Adjusted PR* and 95% CI** | Adjusted PR* and 95% CI** |
Gender | |||
Female | 1.32 (0.925; 1.907) | 0.91 (0.421; 2.005) | 1.01 (0.429; 2.393) |
Male | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
Feeling alone | |||
Yes | 1.59 (1.123; 2.259) | 6.84 (2.047; 22.894) | 8.90 (2.075; 38.208) |
No | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
History of mental health treatment | |||
Never before | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
During medical training | 1.42 (0.980; 2.081) | 2.51 (0.957; 6.612) | 3.16 (1.061; 9.439) |
Prior to medical training | 1.63 (1.052; 2.542) | 4.74 (1.790; 12.579) | 6.01 (2.000; 18.098) |
Feeling morally harmed | |||
Yes | 1.66 (1.168; 2.364) | 2.02 (0.842; 4.842) | 1.92 (0.748; 4.929) |
No | ref*** | ref*** | ref*** |
*Adjusted prevalence ratios; ** 95% confidence intervals; *** ref (reference: unexposed or lower exposed category); # Zigmond and Snaith [10]. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67(6):361-70. Available for textual search at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
DISCUSSION
The present study evaluated scores indicative of depression, anxiety, and both conditions present simultaneously in medical students and investigated the associated factors. Anxiety was the most common issue (41.4%), with a frequency rate five times higher than depression (8.2%), and almost six times higher than depression and anxiety together (7.0%). ‘Loneliness’ and ‘having a history of psychiatri c/psychological treatment before entering college’ were the main factors associated with the three analyzed scores. ‘Feeling morally harmed’ during the course was associated exclusively with anxiety and emerges as a delicate question involving interpersonal relationships among students, as well as between students and teachers.
In the literature, there have been few studies delineating a risk profile for mental disorders in medical students, particularly in Brazilian universities. Our findings demonstrate that part of the problem precedes the students’ academic career, and another part takes place during medical training. In Malaysia13, a median academic performance at high school level was associated with depression in candidates that entered medical school, with an impact on the learning process. The authors called attention to the fact that the problem chronically persists throughout medical training. In The United Kingdom, students with great difficulty in keeping up with academic activities due to mental health issues had a history of some disorder that preceded admission to medical school, with a probability ratio of 5.03 (95% CI: 1.32; 19.19)14. In Brazil, a study developed at a federal university in the northern region of the country showed that psychological or psychiatric treatment had no effect on depression15. It is possible that the lack of association was due to the fact that the authors analyzed mild, moderate, and severe depression levels jointly.
Although the effect of ‘feeling alone’ was relevant, it is worth pointing out that it is a problem that can be a risk factor16 for, but also a consequence of mental disorders17. The interpretation of associations with possible reverse causality requires caution. Nonetheless, in Somalia1, a study with university students from nine different courses demonstrated that the absence of a close friend and the dissatisfaction with relationships with friends and family constituted important risk factors for mental health issues. In Brazil, it is common for the students to leave behind home and family and move to places that are foreign to them, in order to proceed with their studies. Minimizing the effects of this separation is not always possible by simply establishing new relationships. Hence, studies designed specifically to expand on the knowledge regarding the reason given for feeling lonely will help to understand its role on the mental health of medical students.
Mental disorders, including depression and anxiety, are global problems which cause disability and death in most of the world. Around 800,000 deaths by suicide each year are related to depressive disorders. Estimates for the year 2015 demonstrated that 322 million people were living with depression and more than 264 million with anxiety, corresponding to a global prevalence of 4.4% and 3.6%, respectively. In the Americas, Brazil has the second highest prevalence (5.8%) of people with depression, behind only the United States (5.9%). Brazil is at the top of the list of people living with anxiety, and it is estimated that 9.3% of the population is living with this mental disorder5.
Comparatively to the general Brazilian population, there seems to be no differences between our estimates for depression and those provided by the Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde-2013 (‘National Health Research,’ or PNS-2013). According to Stopa et al18, 7.6% (95% CI: 7.2%; 8.1%) people aged ≥ 18 years old have a self-reported diagnosis of depression. These authors demonstrated that among Brazilians with complete high school or incomplete higher education level, the frequency was 6.4% (95% CI: 5.8% - 7.0%), and in those with complete higher education level, it was 8.7% (95% CI: 7.5%; 9.9%).
We measured the frequency of anxiety and depression using the ‘Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale’ (HADS). Aiming at assessing exclusively potentially severe cases, we utilized the most restrictive cutoff point (≥ 11) of the subscales. That way, our parameters did not differ from those of aggregate prevalence for depression classified as severe (9.9%; 95% CI: 6.5%; 14.1%) and for anxiety (31.5%; 95% CI: 26.1%; 37.1%) as shown by meta-analysis 6 of Brazilian studies carried out with different tools. The overlapping of confidence intervals suggests that mental disorders in our students are similar to those found in students in other Brazilian institutions.
Different cutoff points for screening and classifying the severity of these mental problems deserve careful attention in prevalence studies and can partially explain the variability of estimates found using HADS and other tools. HADS has a long history of international use9; however, it has not been largely employed in Brazil yet. In the present scenario of growing academic interest in medical students’ mental health, it was surprising that only one study19 was found in the consulted literature whose authors choose HADS. The study was conducted at a private school in Brazil and determined a prevalence rate of anxiety (19.7%) and depression (5.6%) using the restrictive cutoff point (≥ 11). After the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimate for anxiety (95% CI: 14.6%; 24.8%) and for depression (95% CI: 2.65%; 8.54%) based on sample parameters provided by Vasconcelos et al19, we observed that the frequency of anxiety is higher in our students, but the depression problem is similar to that observed in the private school.
International studies that used the cutoff point for severe disorder (≥ 11), prevalence of anxiety and depression detected in a sample of 409 medical students in Pakistan were, respectively, 37% and 8.6%20. Another study carried out with 450 medical students in Saudi Arabia estimated an anxiety prevalence rate of 34.9% and depression of 14.7%, considering the same criterion of a cutoff point ≥ 11 21. However, the mental status of medical students at Cambridge University (in The United Kingdom) seems to be less severe, since upon use of a cutoff point ≥ 8 in HADS, which included borderline or false-positive cases, the higher prevalence (depression) was 10.6% during the third year, followed by 8.2% during the sixth year of the course22.
As limitations, we recognize that the cross-sectional design with data collection at a single point in time is not appropriate form to reach robust conclusions regarding outcome predictors. Nonetheless, the most important factor identified -psychiatric/psychological treatment- points to the severity of students’ mental health situation prior to entering medical school. This reinforces the idea that, in order to mitigate these problems, measures should also consider the period prior to admission at the university.
Secondly, our results derive from the assessment of participants in classrooms or engaging in internship activities. This decision may have excluded people who were probably not fulfilling the programed activities and who may have been mentally frail. A similar result may be present among the eighteen students who refused to answer the questionnaire. In this case, our results may be underestimated, despite their similarity with other national and international studies.
Another limitation is the lack of information about hazing. Although this practice seems not to be common in our institution it is possible that some students had experienced some form of abuse with mental health repercussions. It is important to emphasize that according to Lima et al23 violence seems to be naturally embedded in acts that are not always seen as abusive by the academic community, some teachers included. Hazing is a problem that must be faced with seriousness and abolished from our educational institutions.
In conclusion, anxiety and depression are common in medical students. Specific treatments for these disorders prior to entering the university are the most important associated factors, followed by loneliness and lack of respect in interpersonal relationships at the university. Mental health in students in general should be part of the agenda for Education and Health in Brazil. This study suggests that solution propositions should consider the period preceding university admission, as well as initiatives regarding a better welcoming of students and reducing situations that may represent conflicts during the university career.