Dear Editor,
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on culture, tourism and industry is widely discussed in Brazil. With regards to the health field, patients with diseases or suspected diseases have put off going to the hospital to investigate possible disease or continue treatment. Thus, other serious conditions, such as cancer and malaria, which affect more than 200 million people throughout the world and kill approximately half a million per year1, are not being investigated.
This conflict is also apparent in the area of medical research, as 80% of all biomedical trials that are not related to Covid-19 have been interrupted2, along with the closing of laboratories, cancelation of conferences, cuts to funding and researchers suspending their investigations to dedicate their efforts to Covid-19. Studies on the novel coronavirus are considered essential due to the high number of contaminations and deaths, but are studies addressing other diseases also not considered essential3?
Although the pandemic constitutes an exceptional circumstance in the field of public health, in which all efforts are required to save lives, the return to scientific research not related to Covid-19 is fundamental, as such research can also save lives and improve the quality of life of millions of people affected by serious life-threatening diseases. Financial resources earmarked for studies into Covid-19 could lead to reduced funding for other research projects, as the Brazilian economy has shrunk, as reflected in the country’s gross domestic product dropping by 4.1% in 20204.
Undergraduate courses at Brazilian medical schools have also been affected due to the limitation imposed on elective surgical operations and beds on hospital wards and in intensive care units being occupied by Covid-19 patients. This has been detrimental to educational activities involving surgical specialties, which may have repercussions for the qualification of healthcare professionals who will care for patients in the post-Covid-19 era.
Scientific initiation studies in undergraduate courses, which make a substantial contribution to the education of new scientists in the country, have also suffered from the drastic reduction in funding for research and the difficulty in assessing patients, especially in studies that involve investigations of patient quality of life. Due to the fear of contracting the disease at the hospital, difficulties regarding access to the various forms of social communication and a cultural reluctance among patients to complete questionnaires necessary for evaluating results, the scientific initiation projects of undergraduate students at our medical school addressing pain and quality of life in patients following a mastectomy have become unfeasible.
The worries of our future scientists and healthcare professionals, especially in the field of medicine, should be an issue of concern for the government, anticipating negative consequences to the education of scientists and physicians in the post-pandemic era. Efforts should be made to attenuate the harm caused to these students during the two years of social isolation brought by the pandemic, which could lead to an irreparable gap in their education, with serious consequences for society and Brazilian science.