Resumo

NAIDORF, Judith; VASEN, Federico  e  ALONSO, Mauro. AGREEING ON CRITERIA IN A FRAGMENTED SYSTEM. TENSIONS AROUND THE EVALUATION OF APPLIED RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE ORIGIN OF THE PROJECTS OF TECHNOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT. Eccos Rev. Cient. [online]. 2019, n.49, e13325.  Epub 17-Jan-2024. ISSN 1983-9278.  https://doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n49.13325.

The Technological and Social Development Projects (PDTS) emerged as a response derived to the problem of academic evaluation in Argentina. Its emergence dates from the commissions convened by the then Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation in 2011 and 2012 that sought to review the evaluation parameters of the scientific task. The analysis that follows recovers over fifty interviews carried out with key actors of the process of the aforementioned scientific policy tool (officials, project managers, research teams, members of the PDTS Nacional Bank accrediting committees, members and coordinators of the special commissions of CONICET that evaluate requests for promotion and reports of researchers involved in PDTS) as well as a detailed documentary revision of forms of application, evaluation criteria documents, procceding and includes an updated bibliographical revision and analysis of scientific policies. In our analysis we highlight the awareness of officials about the importance of the evaluation criteria to address the problem of the lack of applied and technological research. The generation of instances of dialogue and articulation in a highly fragmented scientific system was another interesting effect of the process.

Palavras-chave : Academic Evaluation; Scientific Policy; Technological and Social Development Projects..

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )