SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 número1Usos e incompreensões do conceito de gênero no discurso educacional no Brasil índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Compartir


Revista Estudos Feministas

versión impresa ISSN 0104-026Xversión On-line ISSN 1806-9584

Resumen

COSTA, Angelo Brandelli  y  NARDI, Henrique Caetano. "Homoaffective" marriage and sexual politics: implications of the use of affection as justification for same-sex unions. Rev. Estud. Fem. [online]. 2015, vol.23, n.1, pp.137-150. ISSN 1806-9584.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-026X2015v23n1p/137.

In Brazil, the justifications for the realization of these rights are seated in the affective aspect of the relationships between people of the same sex with the use of the term "homoaffection". The aim of this study is to critically examine this justification, pointing to its political and subjective repercussions. Foucauldian discourse analysis was used and the arguments were confronted to the debate on democratic right of sexuality in contemporary Brazilian political, and social context. The analysis indicates that the State is legislating recommending models of affection instead of guaranteeing a democratic right of sexuality, namely using romantic love discourse, even if implicitly, to produce a regulatory framework for subjectivities, based on private demands. We conclude to the need of a justification based on more fundamental rights (freedom, equality, non-discrimination) that, once secured, can ensure, a secular, formal, universal and abstract public sphere that meets the interests of individuals, including those based on romantic love, without being reduced to it.

Palabras clave : Homoaffection; Homosexuality; Human Rights; Marriage; Civil Partnership..

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Portugués     · Portugués ( pdf )