SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 número3Inovação no ensino: uma revisão sistemática das metodologias ativas de ensino-aprendizagemPercepção da transparência no ensino superior: um olhar além dos aspectos legais índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Compartir


Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas)

versión impresa ISSN 1414-4077versión On-line ISSN 1982-5765

Resumen

MAGNIN, Luana Silvy de Lorenzi Tezza  y  TAKAHASHI, Adriana. The Brazilian’s academic productivity evaluation policy from the researchers' perspective: a meta-synthesis. Avaliação (Campinas) [online]. 2021, vol.26, n.3, pp.742-758. ISSN 1982-5765.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s1414-40772021000300006.

The goal of frequent publishing in journals of excellence has resulted in exhaustive journeys of many teachers. This meta-synthesis aims to verify how the Brazilian researchers have studied the positioning of their peers, considering the scientific productivity’s evaluation policy in the country formulated by CAPES and CNPQ. Those institutions adopt productivity criteria that guide the evaluation of postgraduate programs and their teachers. A total of 46 scientific papers were found, of which 4 were used for the meta-synthesis. The criteria of selection and analysis adopted were based on Bakhtin's language philosophy: criticality, plurilingualism, ideological positioning, quality of insights and socio-historical contextualization. Even the few studies that met the above criteria prioritize methodologies that are based on quantitative measurement logic, with insufficient appropriation of historical aspects and voices in the analyzes. It was verified that the evaluation policy not only evaluates, but strengthens and induces certain research practices. By not problematizing the context and the voices, one runs the risk of adopting functionalist positions, which legitimize statements already in evidence, naturalizing reality and failing to recognize the individuals as transformation agents. We conclude that studies that focus on evaluation policies should consider the construction of the researcher's modes of subjectivity. There is not enough clarity in the literature about how does evaluation criteria interfere on individual’s subjectivity and on how does one organizes and gives meaning to it’s work and himself.

Palabras clave : Evaluation; Bakhtin; Productivity.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Portugués     · Portugués ( pdf )