SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 número3APORTACIONES DE TALIS 2018 AL CONOCIMIENTO DE LAS PRÁCTICAS DOCENTES SOCIALMENTE JUSTAS EN ALGUNOS PAÍSES DE IBEROAMÉRICARELEVANCIA Y URGENCIA DEL LENGUAJE DE SEÑAS (L1) Y DEL PORTUGUÉS (L2 / LE) EN EL CURRÍCULO DE ESTUDIANTES SORDOS EN MOZAMBIQUE índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Compartir


Revista e-Curriculum

versión On-line ISSN 1809-3876

Resumen

TARABINI, Aina  y  JACOVKIS, Judith. WHICH KNOWLEDGE FOR WHOM? SCHOOL TRACKS, KNOWLEDGE DISTRIBUTION AND SCHOOL JUSTICE. e-Curriculum [online]. 2019, vol.17, n.3, pp.880-908.  Epub 28-Oct-2019. ISSN 1809-3876.  https://doi.org/10.23925/1809-3876.2019v17i3p880-908.

The distribution of school knowledge is a key dimension of social justice. One of the main dividing lines between different types of knowledge is based on its more or less theoretical or applied character. In this sense, the division between academic and vocational tracks established in worldwide education systems is crucial to understand the distribution and acquisition of different types of knowledge and their impact in terms of social inequality. In Catalonia, this division is firstly introduced in post-compulsory secondary education, when the educational system is divided in two different tracks. In this context, the objective of the article is to analyse the type of knowledge attributed to Baccalaureate and Vocational Training, from a critical realist approach. Methodologically, the article is based on a discourse analysis of political and school actors relevant in this field. Specifically, it consists of 28 interviews with policy makers and 37 interviews with principals and coordination teams of 8 secondary schools in Barcelona. The results show, on the one hand, a high dichotomy between a type of theoretical knowledge ascribed to Baccalaureate and a type of practical knowledge assigned to Vocational Training, which in turn is based on false attributes about the meaning of both types of knowledge. On the other hand, a rationale for these dichotomies based on a highly hierarchical conception of the functions of both tracks and a naturalization of the abilities and needs of their students.

Palabras clave : School knowledge; Social justice; Vocational training; Educational transitions; Critical realism.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )