SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.18Research ethics and the perspective of the principle of autonomy in the professional project and in Social Work researchA cartography of the Ethics Committees of the Polytechnic Higher Education in Portugal (2023) author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Share


Práxis Educativa

Print version ISSN 1809-4031On-line version ISSN 1809-4309

Abstract

ROCHA, Karina de Albuquerque  and  VASCONCELOS, S onia M. R.. Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?. Práxis Educativa [online]. 2023, vol.18, e21955.  Epub Sep 18, 2023. ISSN 1809-4309.  https://doi.org/10.5212/praxeduc.v.18.21955.073.

The ethics regulation of human-subject research in Brazil is by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP)/National Commission of Research Ethics (CONEP) System. While primarily focusing on biomedical research, this System also oversees the ethics of non-biomedical research. However, a distinct clash between these two research cultures is evident in Brazil. Despite existing guidelines, the cultural clash between biomedical and the humanities and social sciences (HSS) research has fueled discussions that include separating HSS research from the oversight of the CEP/CONEP System. We investigated perceptions of this ethics regulatory framework, focusing on HSS. A survey was conducted among coordinators of HSS graduate programs in six Brazilian public universities. We found growing awareness of and willingness to address the ethical aspects of human-subject research. Paradoxically, the ongoing conflictual debate seems to be gradually bridging the gap between these two cultures and feeding transformative changes to ethics regulation in HSS human-subject research in Brazil.

Keywords : Research ethics; Human-subject research; Graduate programs.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )