Resumo

ANDRE, Marli Eliza Dalmazo Afonso de. Professional and Academic Master Courses: approximations and differences. Rev. Diálogo Educ. [online]. 2017, vol.17, n.53, pp.823-841.  Epub 28-Fev-2020. ISSN 1981-416X.  https://doi.org/10.7213/1981-416x.17.053.ao06.

The paper discusses a proposal for professional training of basic educators. It takes as a background some challenges faced in the education of graduate students following a Professional Master’s Program in Education: Education of Teacher Educators in the Catholic University of Saint Paul. The course objective is to create conditions for the development of critical, reflective, symbolic analysts of reality and change makers that can contribute to a good education to children and youth in basic school. The proposed curriculum focuses on courses and activities intended to connect research and pedagogical practice, which led to a question: what characterizes research in the professional master’s degree and to what extent it is different from research in academic master. Several foreign authors, such as Stenhouse, Elliot, Tripp, Lerner who discuss research and intervention at school and in the classroom were revisited. Brazilian authors such as Lüdke and Gatti were also reviewed to help answer the question. It was found that the main difference lies in the focus of the study: in one the reference is the professional practice, in the other the focus is in the advancement of knowledge. The common point between academic and practice research is theoretical and methodological rigor: both require planning, control and knowledge systematization.

Palavras-chave : Professional Master; Education trainning; Basic education; Research on Pedagogic Practice.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )