SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 número04Avaliação do crescimento cognitivo do estudante de medicina: aplicação do teste de equalização no teste de progressoSuicídio: um tema pouco conhecido na formação médica índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Compartilhar


Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica

versão On-line ISSN 1981-5271

Resumo

PORTUGAL, Hélio Sérgio Pinto et al. Modelo pélvico sintético como uma ferramenta didática efetiva comparada à pelve cadavérica. Rev. Bras. Educ. Med. [online]. 2011, vol.35, n.04, pp.502-506. ISSN 1981-5271.

Anatomy is considered a fundamental subject of medical education. Practical classes which involve the use of manipulable anatomic components are essential to teaching and learning. The aim of this study was to evaluate the synthetic pelvic model (SPM) as a didactic tool, compared to the traditionally- used cadaveric pelvis (CP), as well as student satisfaction in relation to both methods. Sixty-seven students were given a theory class following the preliminary theoretical test (PTT). The study sample was randomized in three groups: G1 had a traditional practical class (TPC); G2 had a practical class with SPM (PCS); and G3 had no practical class. A final test (FTT) was applied to all the groups. G1 and G2 were subjected to method evaluation (ME). Statistical analysis was conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Mann-Whitney U test. In the FTT, G3 presented scores lower than G1 (p = 0.041) and G2 (p = 0.000). No statistically significant difference was found between G1 and G2 (p >0.05). G2 presented greater satisfaction with the method (p = 0.001). In conclusion, both CP and SPM proved to be effective didactic tools and student satisfaction was greater with G2.

Palavras-chave : Medical Education; Anatomy; Anatomical Model; Pelvic Floor.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )