SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 número4Metodologias Ativas de Aprendizagem: Desafios dos Docentes de Duas Faculdades de Medicina do Rio Grande do Sul, BrasilPercepção dos Estudantes de Medicina sobre o Uso da Metodologia da Problematização durante a Graduação índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Compartilhar


Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica

versão impressa ISSN 0100-5502versão On-line ISSN 1981-5271

Resumo

CLAUDINO, Felipe Cesar de Almeida et al. Association between Empathy and Personality in Medical Students. Rev. Bras. Educ. Med. [online]. 2020, vol.44, n.4, e150.  Epub 08-Out-2020. ISSN 1981-5271.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v44.4-20190296.

Introduction:

Empathy is a valuable attribute for a physician, as it positively influences the doctor-patient relationship. Previous studies indicate that there is a correlation between personality and empathy in medical students, but there is no data available in the Brazilian literature so far. This study aimed to analyze the empathy and personality traits of Brazilian medical students, and investigate their association.

Methods:

First year medical students from the 2015 and 2017 cohorts had their empathy and personality traits evaluated by two instruments using the following scales, respectively: Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Students version (JSE-S) and NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). A descriptive analysis comprised mean, minimum and maximum scores, correlation coefficients and linear regression of personality and empathy.

Results:

164 (96.4%) students completed the surveys, and 50.5% were women. The mean global score of the JSE-S was 117.6 ± 10.9; stratification by gender showed scores of 119.5 ± 10.5 and 115.7 ± 11.0, respectively in women and men (p<0.01). In the NEO-FFI, the domain of ‘conscientiousness’ had the highest global mean (29.1 ± 3.8) and ‘neuroticism’, the lowest (21.7 ± 4.7). In women, the highest mean was observed in ‘conscientiousness’ (29.4 ± 3.8) and the lowest in ‘open to new experiences’ (20.6 ± 3.3). In men, the highest and the lowest scores were respectively in the domains ‘conscientiousness’ (29.4 ± 3.9) and ‘neuroticism’ (21.6 ± 4.2). There was a significant difference between men and women in the global score of the JSE-S, and in the personality domains of ‘open to new experiences’ and ‘socialization’. Correlations between empathy and personality were found to be weak and not statistically relevant.

Conclusion:

The personality traits differed between men and women, but there was no significant correlation between empathy and personality among medical students enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Further investigations are needed to examine how empathy and personality modulate during medical studies using longitudinal approaches.

Palavras-chave : Empathy; Personality; Medical Education.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )