SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.45 número3Construção de consenso Delphi das competências otorrinolaringológicas preconizadas ao egresso de Medicina índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Compartilhar


Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica

versão impressa ISSN 0100-5502versão On-line ISSN 1981-5271

Resumo

MADEIRO JUNIOR, José Reinaldo; SILVA, João Luís da; SALES, Alexandre César Vieira de  e  SOUZA, Edvaldo da Silva. Validation of content for an instrument to assess medical students in tutorial sessions. Rev. Bras. Educ. Med. [online]. 2021, vol.45, n.3, e130.  Epub 16-Jun-2021. ISSN 1981-5271.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v45.3-20200017.

Introduction:

The expected doctor profile in Brazil comprises a professional with a holistic view of the human being. To achieve this profile, active teaching methodologies, such as Problem-Based Learning (PBL), are gaining ground. For PBL to achieve all its objectives in the training of professionals, good assessment is essential. The availability of validated assessment instruments represents an advance in the attempt to measure and direct learning.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to develop and validate the content for an instrument for assessing students in tutorial sessions for use in medical courses that use PBL methodology.

Method:

For the construction of the preliminary version of the content for the instrument, a Rapid Systematic Review was carried out in the PUBMED, EBSCO and BVS databases. The preliminary version was thus developed with 24 items grouped in three domains (use of learning, understanding and reasoning resources - D1, Professionalism and teamwork - D2, and Problem-solving and group effectiveness - D3), each with eight items. This version was sent to a panel of experts made up of tutors with at least five years’ experience in PBL at the Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde (FPS), using the Delphi methodology.

Results:

Of the 32 members initially earmarked for the panel, 17 were included in the data analysis, for having fully answered the questionnaire. In the first round, a partial or total agreement value greater than 70 percent was reached, which was initially expected, for all 24 items of the instrument, which dispensed with the need for a second round. To reduce the final number of items, only those with at least 70 percent total agreement were maintained, with the final version of the instrument containing four items on D1, five on D2 and four on D3.

Conclusions:

The instrument was validated with a total of thirteen items. The content for the instrument brought components with several similarities to those that make up the instruments published in the literature that have already been validated, which in turn are in accordance with the learning objectives proposed by PBL.

Palavras-chave : Educational Assessment; Mentoring; Medical Education; Problem-Based Learning.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )