SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 número3Racionalidades Médicas: avaliação de componente optativo na formação médicaProgramas de pesquisa para graduandos em Medicina no Brasil: uma revisão sistemática índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Compartilhar


Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica

versão impressa ISSN 0100-5502versão On-line ISSN 1981-5271

Resumo

ISIDORO, Fabiana Goulart Rabelo et al. Interprofessional education in undergraduate health courses: systematic review. Rev. Bras. Educ. Med. [online]. 2022, vol.46, n.3, e113.  Epub 16-Ago-2022. ISSN 1981-5271.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v46.3-20220030.

Introduction:

Interprofessional Education (IPE) seeks to develop collaborative practice among health professionals to improve patient care.

Objective:

This systematic review exploits the non-punctual IPE strategies in undergraduate health courses, identifying their potential and weaknesses.

Method:

The search included articles published in the LILACS, COCHRANE, CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE. The research question was defined by the PICO anagram: studies were selected that included at least two undergraduate health courses, one of them in Medicine, and that reported a minimum educational strategy of 15 hours and its review. Abstracts published in congresses, opinions, editorials, and systematic reviews were excluded.

Results:

There have been 28 reviewed studies published between 2005-2019, 31% of which have been in the last two years. The dominant themes were simulation (36%) or the use of combined methods (29%) in the assessment of student attitudes, understanding of health professionals’ roles, teamwork, communication, and knowledge in response to IPE interventions. Studies in the Domains - Roles and responsibilities (75%) and teamwork (64%) predominated. The approach to values and ethics (32%); communication (28%) was less frequent. 18 articles (64%) had two or more objectives and six articles (18%) sought to study the four domains of IPE together. Among the interventions used as teaching strategies, 36% (10 studies) were simulation, 29% (8 studies) combined methods, 18% (5 studies) clinical practice (collaborative work in outpatient units or wards), 14% (4 studies) direct observation (shadowing), 11% problem-based learning, and 2 online learning studies (e-learning) and workshops. The overall quality of the included studies was low, meeting two to five of the six quality criteria. Blind peer reviewing was not cited in 25 publications. Collaborative work in real settings is described as the most efficient.

Conclusion:

IPE has been incorporated in the process of healthcare training and multiple results-based competence optimizes effective relationship development and the abilities needed in the collaborative practice. The fragility of the articles indicates that the interprofessional education of students is still a great challenge for educational institutions.

Palavras-chave : Health education; Curriculum; Interprofessional education; Interprofessional relationship.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )