SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número66Círculo de Viena: fisicalismo e a utopia da ciência unificadaEric Weil e o papel da educação humanística no contexto da cultura técnico-científica índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Compartir


Educação e Filosofia

versión impresa ISSN 0102-6801versión On-line ISSN 1982-596X

Resumen

ALEXANDRE, Bruno Santos. Teaching philosophy between “history of philosophy” and “philosophy”. Educação e Filosofia [online]. 2018, vol.32, n.66, pp.965-989.  Epub 22-Sep-2020. ISSN 1982-596X.  https://doi.org/10.14393/revedfil.issn.0102-6801.v32n66a2018-02.

This paper investigates a non-dogmatic form of teaching philosophy. The main issue is if such teaching could only be achieved through a kind of neutral recapitulation of the history of philosophy, or if no recapitulation of the history of philosophy could abdicate a specific philosophical content. In the present work, I address this well-known question by revisiting the debate between the so-called structural methodology adepts (by Martial Guéroult and Victor Goldschmidt), who defend the first position, versus its Brazilian critics (Carlos Alberto Ribeiro de Moura and Oswaldo Porchat), who support the second one. I argue, finally, that the true dogmatists of this debate are the partisans of the first position (which defend monolithic structures for philosophy) rather than the partisans of the second (which explores a critical and interrogative perspective for philosophy: open thus to auto-transformation).

Palabras clave : History of philosophy; Guéroult; Goldschimdt; Porchat; Ribeiro de Moura.

        · resumen en Portugués | Francés     · texto en Portugués     · Portugués ( pdf )