Abstract

KRAEMER, Celso  and  CAMPREGHER, Jeice. Regimes of knowledge/power in discourse about evaluation of extension. Rev. Reflex [online]. 2017, vol.25, n.1, pp.99-117. ISSN 1982-9949.  https://doi.org/Doi:10.17058/rea.v25i1.3406.

This article discusses the regimes of power/knowledge in actuation in the discourses about evaluation of the University Extension activity. The methodological basis is archeology and genealogy of Foucault. The material analised was extracted in a form where teachers proposed extension projects to be developed in a University of Santa Catarina. These are excerpts from discourse that enable rich analysis of regimes of knowledge/power in actuation in University Extension activity. The main questions is: What are the internal and external mechanisms that regulate the teachers' responses to a institucional form about the evaluation of extension students? The objetive is to analyze the discourse on evaluation of extension students, regimes of knowledge/power that make it possible. What the analysis showed: the place institutional regulates discourse; there is asymmetry between institutional subjects, disciplinary power devices operate on the evaluation, it implies forms of conduction of conduct, the participation concept reflects a change of the disciplinary regime for flexible power called control.

Keywords : Disciplinary regime; Control regime; Discourse Analysis; Evaluation of the activity of University Extension.

        · abstract in Portuguese | Spanish     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )