SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19Inverting questions: an invitation to take a stroll on another side of questionsHow to generate (educate) an inquiring-jazzing community: free and open suggestions from an international workshop (ICPIC 2022) author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Share


Childhood & Philosophy

Print version ISSN 2525-5061On-line version ISSN 1984-5987

Abstract

HOLLER, Andreas. The polylogical process model of (elementary-)philosophical education: an interdisciplinary framework that embeds P4wC into the constructivist theory of conceptual change/growth. child.philo [online]. 2023, vol.19, e70210.  Epub Mar 28, 2023. ISSN 1984-5987.  https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2023.70210.

Although the Philosophy for/with Children (P4wC) movement seems to have overcome two major points of criticism, these critical concerns can still be found in the literature today. The first question is whether P4wC can be placed in the field of philosophy at all, and the second asks whether children possess the cognitive abilities necessary to engage in philosophical discourse. One of the more recent articles voicing these concerns is authored by Caroline Heinrich, who describes P4wC as “an assault on philosophy and an assault on children” and argues that P4wC is a “concept imposed by adults on children.” She maintains that P4wC ignores “children’s thinking, questioning and play.” Furthermore, Heinrich states that P4wC cannot be called philosophy because children are not able to philosophize. In most of her argumentation, refering to Jan Piaget’s theoretical account of the cognitive development of children. Although the P4wC discourse has already dealt with these questions over the last few decades, it seems that there is still a need for further clarification. This paper provides an overview of the main points of criticism, which form the starting point of the author’s Polylogical Process Model of (Elementary-)Philosophical Education (PPEE model). This interdisciplinary approach, which is based on the constructivist conceptual change/growth theory of Stella Vosniadou and William Brewer, attempts to add new perspectives to two central questions addressing the P4wC movement: first, can P4wC actually be called philosophy?; second, do children have the cognitive abilities to engage in philosophical discourse? In addition, the question arises as to which pedagogical considerations based on constructivist learning theory could be added to P4wC methodology? The aim of the interdisciplinary PPEE model is to build a broader scientific foundation that has the potential to reduce the main points of criticism of the P4wC movement.

Keywords : philosophy for/with children; criticism; conceptual change/growth; constructivist theory; Polylogical Process Model of (Elementary-)Philosophical Education (PPEE)..

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )