Resumo

TAFFAREL, Celi Nelza Zülke; HACK, Cássia; MORSCHBACHER, Márcia  e  LUZ, Sidnéia Flores. Protection system of work and Physical Education workers: why we are against the regulation of the profession. Rev. Motriviv. [online]. 2021, vol.33, n.64, e80039.  Epub 09-Out-2021. ISSN 2175-8042.  https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8042.2021.e80039.

This article discusses the role of the Federal Council of Physical Education and its Regional Councils of Physical Education in the defense of Physical Education workers. Part of the questions: What is the Unconstitutionality Action nº 3.428/2005, origin, development, and current stage; what is CONFEF/CREF and its (in)ability to protect the workers? It aims to support the stance of the National Movement Against the Regulation of Physical Education Professionals strengthens the labor union struggle, contributing to the Union Movement in Defense of the Labor and Workers Protection System. As our investigation procedure, we used documentary analysis. It demonstrates that this ADIn is valid, has constitutional support, and that the activity of CONFEF/CREF does not grant it prerogatives that allow it to protect the workers. It concludes by the organized defense of the Labor Protection System and the Physical Education Worker based on the associations, considering that the fight for rights is of public interest, because it concerns the life of the workers.

Palavras-chave : CONFEF/CREF; Professional practice in physical education; Labor and social security reforms; Green and yellow employment contract.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )