<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1414-4077</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação (Campinas)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1414-4077</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Publicação da Rede de Avaliação Institucional da Educação Superior (RAIES), da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) e da Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1414-40772010000100007</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Predictive capacity of peer evaluation and the focus of the institutional accreditation model in Chile]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Ponce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Emilio]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fleet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nicolás]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Delgado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Milagros]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A07">
<institution><![CDATA[,Comisión Nacional de Acreditacion  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A07">
<institution><![CDATA[,Comisión Nacional de Acreditacion  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>01</numero>
<fpage>121</fpage>
<lpage>141</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1414-40772010000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1414-40772010000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1414-40772010000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[El presente artículo presenta los resultados de un estudio sobre los procesos de acreditación institucional realizados en Chile en el periodo 2003-2006. El propósito del estudio es estimar la capacidad predictiva que la evaluación externa realizada por los comités de pares tuvo sobre los resultados finales de acreditación institucional. Para ello, se generó un modelo de regresión, donde las calificaciones de los pares evaluadores - sobre las áreas de acreditación “Gestión Institucional” y “Docencia de Pregrado” - se ingresaron como variable independiente y los resultados de acreditación, expresados en la decisión de acreditación y los años de vigencia, como variable dependiente. Como resultados, se comprobó que existe consistencia entre las etapas de evaluación externa y de decisión de acreditación; que las calificaciones otorgadas por los pares en el área de “Docencia de Pregrado” tienen mayor capacidad predictiva que aquellas otorgadas en el área de “Gestión Institucional”, y, por último; que hay elementos para plantear que el foco de 'evaluación' (en comparación al foco de ‘auditoria’) fue predominante en el modelo de acreditación institucional chileno entre los años estudiados.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This article presents the results of a study of the institutional accreditation processes that took place in Chile during the period of 2003 to 2006. The purpose of the study is to estimate the capacity of peer evaluation to predict the final results of institutional accreditation. Thus, a regression model was developed, in which the score given by the academic peers to the institutions -in the accreditation areas of “Institutional Management” and “Undergraduate Teaching Process” - were entered as the independent variable, and the accreditation results, expressed in the accreditation decision and the period of accreditation, were included in the model as the dependent variable. The results show that there is consistency between the peer evaluation and the accreditation decision; that the score given by the academic peer to the area of “Undergraduate Teaching Process” has more capacity to predict the accreditation results than the score of the area “Institutional Management”; and, that there are arguments to support that the focus on “evaluation” (in comparison to the focus on audit) was predominant in the model of institutional accreditation in Chile during the studied period.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Acreditación Institucional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Evaluación de los Pares]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Modelo de Acreditación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Institutional Accreditation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Peer Evaluation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Accreditation Model]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h2>Capacidad predictiva de la evaluaci&oacute;n de los pares y focos del modelo de  acreditaci&oacute;n institucional en Chile </h2> <h3>Predictive capacity of peer evaluation and the focus of the  institutional accreditation model in Chile </h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>Emilio Rodr&iacute;guez-Ponce,  Nicol&aacute;s Fleet, Milagros Delgado    <br> </h4> </FONT>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DILL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Designing academic audit: lessons learned in Europe and Asia.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Quality in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>Nov.</year>
<month> 2</month>
<day>00</day>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HARVEY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lee]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NEWTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jethro]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Transforming quality evaluation.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Quality in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>Juli</year>
<month>o,</month>
<day> 2</day>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STENSAKER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bjorn]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[External Quality auditing in sweden: are departments affected?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Higher Education Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VROEIJENSTIJN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Governments and university: opponents or allies in quality assurance?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Higher Education Review]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
