<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1414-4077</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação (Campinas)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1414-4077</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Publicação da Rede de Avaliação Institucional da Educação Superior (RAIES), da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) e da Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1414-40772010000300007</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Instrumentos para avaliar disciplinas da modalidade semipresencial: uma proposta baseada em sistemas de indicadores]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bertolin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Júlio C. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marchi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana Carolina Bertoletti de]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A07">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade de Passo Fundo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>03</numero>
<fpage>131</fpage>
<lpage>146</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1414-40772010000300007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1414-40772010000300007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1414-40772010000300007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[A avaliação da educação é um tema complexo e que possui grande importância nas abordagens e projetos de qualidade de instituições, cursos e disciplinas da educação superior. Quando abordada no âmbito da educação a distância (EaD), a avaliação da qualidade da educação adquire uma relevância e complexidade ainda maiores visto que as diferenças de espaço e tempo entre professor e aluno certamente impactam o processo de aprendizagem. O presente artigo busca contribuir com a avaliação da qualidade da modalidade EaD por meio do desenvolvimento de uma proposta de instrumentos para avaliação de disciplinas semipresenciais da educação superior. Fundamentado em sistemas de indicadores e composto por questionários de avaliação e auto-avaliação, o instrumento incorpora aspectos de auto-validação ao permitir o cotejamento entre os indicadores de resultados e os aspectos de entradas e processo da disciplina e entre a avaliação de um sujeito interessado e a auto-avaliação de outros sujeitos envolvidos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The evaluation of education is a complex issue that has great importance in approaches and projects for quality in higher education institutions, programs and courses. When approached in the context of distance education (D.Ed.), the evaluation of the quality of education takes on even greater relevance and complexity because differences in space and time between teacher and student will certainly impact the learning process. This article intends to contribute to the evaluation of the quality of Distance Education through the development of a proposal of instruments to evaluate hybrid courses in higher education. Based on systems of indicators and composed by evaluation and self-evaluation questionnaires, the instrument incorporates aspects of self validation by allowing the collation between the indicators of results and the aspects of inputs and process of the course and between the evaluation of a person involved with the course and the self-evaluation of other people involved.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Educação a Distância]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação de Disciplina Semipresencial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Distance Education]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Hybrid Courses]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation of Hybrid Disciplines]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h2>Instrumentos para avaliar disciplinas da modalidade  semipresencial: uma proposta baseada em sistemas de indicadores.</h2> <h3>Instruments for the  evaluation of semipresential courses: a proposal based on systems of indicators.</h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>J&uacute;lio C. G. Bertolin, Ana Carolina Bertoletti de Marchi    <br> </h4> </FONT>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ESTRADA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. R. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Hacia un modelo de evaluación de la calidad de instituciones de educación superior.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Iberoamericana de Educación]]></source>
<year>dez.</year>
<month> 1</month>
<day>99</day>
<numero>21</numero>
<issue>21</issue>
<page-range>93-103</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MIZIKACI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fatma]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A systems approach to program evaluation model for quality in higher education.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Quality Assurance Education]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>37-53</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Massachusetts ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SAHNEY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BANWET]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KARUNES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Conceptualizing total quality management in higher education.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The TQM Magazine]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>145-159</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bingley ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
