<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1414-4077</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação (Campinas)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1414-4077</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Publicação da Rede de Avaliação Institucional da Educação Superior (RAIES), da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) e da Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1414-40772013000100011</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação institucional no ensino superior: construção de escalas para discentes e docentes]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Batista]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marcos Antonio]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paula]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maria de Fátima Freitas de]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oliveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maria Ignez Arantes]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Almeida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Emanuel Eustáquio]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A11">
<institution><![CDATA[,Univás  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[MG ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>01</numero>
<fpage>201</fpage>
<lpage>218</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1414-40772013000100011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1414-40772013000100011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1414-40772013000100011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[O objetivo deste estudo é descrever o processo de construção de um instrumento de avaliação para mensurar a autopercepção de discentes, docentes e funcionários acerca dos vários aspectos da rotina acadêmica de uma Instituição de Ensino Superior. Na etapa inicial, elaborou-se um instrumento piloto, sob a forma de escala Likert de cinco pontos, com base nas dimensões indicadas pelo Sistema Nacional de Avaliação da Educação Superior. Estudos psicométricos de análise fatorial e precisão evidenciaram diferenças nos pontos de vista de discentes, docentes e funcionários. Agrupados em três bancos de dados, os protocolos passaram por novas análises que resultaram em duas escalas consistentes para docentes e discentes, como se percebe pela boa configuração e interpretação dos fatores. A impossibilidade de se finalizar uma escala para os funcionários demonstrou a existência de falha na construção dos itens para esse segmento e sugeriu novos procedimentos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This study aims to describe the construction process of an evaluation instrument to measure the self-perception of students, professors and employees, under several aspects of the academic routine of a university. The starting-point was a pilot instrument, with a five-point Likert scale, based on the suitable dimensions for the National System of Evaluation of the Higher Education. Psychometric studies of factor analysis and precision instrument pointed to differences concerning the students’, the professors’ and the employees’ points of view. The data was then divided into three databanks and went through new analysis, which resulted in two consistent scales for professors and students, as the coherence and consistency of the study and the proper interpretation of the factors show. The impossibility of creating an employees’ scale showed a failure in the construction of the items and required new procedures.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Análise Fatorial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Psicometria]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Universitários]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Docentes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Factor Analysis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Psychometry]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Undergraduate Students]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Professors]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h2>Avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o institucional no ensino superior: constru&ccedil;&atilde;o de  escalas para discentes e docentes.</h2> <h3>Institutional  evaluation in higher education: construction of the scales for the university  students and professors.</h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>Marcos Antonio Batista, Maria de F&aacute;tima Freitas de Paula,  Maria Ignez Arantes Oliveira, Emanuel Eust&aacute;quio Almeida    <br> </h4> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>223-228</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Revista Educação & Sociedade]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>83</numero>
<issue>83</issue>
<page-range>37-61</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Ensaio]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>47</numero>
<issue>47</issue>
<page-range>149-168</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação Psicológica]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>11-20</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Porto Alegre ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
