<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1981-416x</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Diálogo Educacional]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Diálogo Educ.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1981-416x</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1981-416x2010000300005</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[As particularidades e os fatores de sucesso na colaboração a distância entre professores no âmbito do projeto Cégep em Rede]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poellhuber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bruno]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fortin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marie-Noëlle]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sirléia Ferreira Silva]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A05">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade de Montreal  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Canadá</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A05">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Estadual de Minas Gerais  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>31</numero>
<fpage>541</fpage>
<lpage>560</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1981-416x2010000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1981-416x2010000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1981-416x2010000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Este artigo apresenta uma vertente dos resultados de um projeto de pesquisa-ação centrado na colaboração a distância (telecolaboração) entre professores de estabelecimentos distantes, a fim de favorecer o desenvolvimento profissional desses professores e dinamizar os programas oferecidos a pequenos grupos. De maneira muito específica, o artigo explica os fatores que contribuíram para o sucesso da colaboração a distância entre os professores participantes. Tal projeto, denominado Cégeps em Rede, conduzido pelo Cefrio (Centro Francófono de Informação das Organizações), consiste em agrupar classes de mesmos programas a pequenos grupos em Cégeps diferentes. Uma garantia do sucesso da colaboração entre professores - que a diferencia da colaboração a distância entre estudantes - parece ser uma comunicação freqüente e contínua que se realiza por meio de uma diversidade de meios tecnológicos, bem como por encontros presenciais ocasionais. No âmbito da pesquisa, o desenvolvimento de um modelo teórico unificado aplicável tanto à colaboração entre professores quanto à colaboração entre estudantes, e tanto à colaboração a distância quanto à colaboração presencial, seria um avanço apreciável.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This article sets out part of the results obtained from an action research project focusing on remote collaboration (telecollaboration) between teachers from distant colleges, and aimed at fostering the professional development of teachers and stimulating education programs offered to small groups. More specifically, this article explains the factors that contributed to the success of the remote collaboration between participating teachers. The project, named Cégeps en Réseau (“Networked colleges”) and managed by the Cefrio - Centre francophone d’information des organisations (“Frenchspeaking organizations’ information center”), consisted in twining classes from different colleges sharing the same small group programs. The twining was made to allow collaboration between teachers and between students from these programs. One of the success factors of the teacher’ collaboration - which differentiates it from the students’ remote collaboration - seems to be frequent and continuous communication through a range of technological means, as well as occasional in person meetings. Regarding research, the development of a unified theoretical model applicable both to teachers’ collaboration and students’ collaboration, and both to remote collaboration and in person collaboration, would be a great advance.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Cet article présente un volet des résultats d’un projet de recherche-action axé sur la collaboration à distance (télécollaboration) entre enseignants d’établissements distants, afin de favoriser le développement professionnel des enseignants et de dynamiser les programmes offerts à de petits groupes. De manière plus spécifique, l’article explique les facteurs qui ont contribué au succès de la collaboration à distance entre ces enseignants participant. Tel projet, appelé Cégeps en réseau, piloté par le Cefrio (Centre francophone d’information des organisations) consiste à jumeler des classes de mêmes programmes à petites cohortes données dans des cégeps différents. Ce jumelage est instauré afin de créer une collaboration entre les enseignants et entre les étudiants de ces programmes. Un des gages du succès de la collaboration entre enseignants qui la différencie de la collaboration à distance entre étudiants semble être une communication fréquente et continue qui se réalise par le biais d’une diversité de moyens technologiques ainsi que par des rencontres occasionnelles en présence. Sur le plan de la recherche, le développement d’un modèle théorique unifié applicable aussi bien à la collaboration entre enseignants qu’à la collaboration entre étudiants et à la collaboration à distance qu’à la collaboration en présence serait une avancée appréciable.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Colaboração a Distância]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Desenvolvimento Profissional de Professores]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Trabalho em Equipe]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Remote Collaboration]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Teachers Professional Development]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Team Work]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Collaboration a Distance]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Développement Professionnel des Enseignants]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Travail des Equipes]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h2>As particularidades e os  fatores de sucesso na colabora&ccedil;&atilde;o a dist&acirc;ncia entre professores no &acirc;mbito do  projeto C&eacute;gep em Rede.</h2> <h3>Particularities and success factors of remote collaboration between  teachers within the C&eacute;gep en R&eacute;seau project.</h3> <h3>Les particularit&eacute;s et facteurs de succ&egrave;s de la collaboration &agrave; distance  entre enseignants dans le cadre du projet C&eacute;gep en R&eacute;seau.</h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>Bruno Poellhuber, Marie-No&euml;lle  Fortin, Sirl&eacute;ia Ferreira Silva Rosa    <br> </h4> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CLARKE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HOLLINGSWORTH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Teaching and Teacher Education]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>947-967</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KELLER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The effects of high-structure cooperative versus low-structure collaborative design of decision change, critical thinking, and interaction pattern during online debates.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Association for Educational Communications and Technology]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<page-range>19-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KOCHAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MULLEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[An exploratory study of collaboration in higher education from women’s perspectives.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Teaching Education]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>153-167</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KNIGHT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A systemic approach to professional development: learning as practice.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Teaching and Teacher Education]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>229-241</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MURATA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[What does team teaching mean? A case study of interdisciplinary teaming.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Educational Research]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>96</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>67-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[UWAMARIYA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MUKAMURERA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Le concept de “développement professionnel” en enseignement: approches théoriques.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revue des Sciences de L’Éducation]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>133-155</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
