<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1981-5271</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Bras. Educ. Med.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1981-5271</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1981-52712021000400412</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1981-5271v45.supl.1-20210149</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Implantação de um programa de mentoria remoto para estudantes de Medicina em tempo de pandemia]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Implementation of a remote mentorship program for medical students during the pandemic]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mazutti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sandra Regina Gonzaga]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roncati]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana Cristina Kuhn Pletsch]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Délio Eulálio]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Anhembi Morumbi  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[São Paulo São Paulo]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>45</volume>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1981-52712021000400412&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1981-52712021000400412&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1981-52712021000400412&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo:  Introdução:  Programas de mentoria são necessários para apoio ao estudante de Medicina e podem ter diversos objetivos, dependendo das instituições que os implementam, embora ainda não sejam uma realidade na maioria das universidades. Durante a pandemia da Covid-19, encontros presenciais foram impedidos, o que dificultou ainda mais a manutenção desses programas, apesar de ser um dos momentos de maior necessidade emocional para os alunos. Ajustaram-se as aulas, e os encontros foram transformados em remotos, e, dessa forma, a mentoria on-line passou a ser uma realidade.  Relato de experiência: Apoiado pelo Núcleo de Apoio Psicopedagógico dos Estudantes de Medicina (Napem), foi estruturado um programa de mentoria em pequenos grupos, formados por docentes, discentes mais experientes (comentores) e mentorados (alunos do primeiro ao terceiro ano) com reuniões realizadas de forma remota, o que permitiu a participação dos estudantes, a interação com eles e o acolhimento desse público. As reuniões aconteceram entre junho e dezembro de 2020. O programa contou com a participação de 13 mentores, 94 alunos mentorados e 24 comentores. O programa teve uma sessão de treinamento com mentores e comentores, que foi conduzida pela psicóloga do Napem para alinhamento de expectativas e orientações. As discussões nos grupos focaram dificuldades na vida acadêmica, profissional e pessoal.  Discussão: O modelo remoto de mentoria apresenta como pontos fortes a maior flexibilidade para mentores e mentorados, a facilidade de participação de ambos e a manutenção da conexão do grupo, pois os encontros são facilitados pela tecnologia, visto que não houve nenhuma desistência. Como ponto fraco dessa experiência, citamos a falta de análises quantitativas e qualitativas do programa utilizando, por exemplo, entrevistas ou questionários de forma científica para avaliar melhor os resultados.  Conclusão: A mentoria remota é útil e deve ser incluída como uma possibilidade de legado permanente para os cursos de Medicina, pois os encontros mostraram-se relevantes para mentores e mentorados, e mantiveram-se com alta adesão durante todo o programa.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract:  Introduction: Mentoring programs are necessary to support medical students and can have different objectives depending on the institution where they are implemented, although most universities have not yet reached that stage. During the Covid-19 pandemic, face-to-face meetings have been cancelled, making these programs even more difficult to maintain despite it being a time of even greater emotional need for the students. Classes were adjusted, and the meetings were transformed into remote sessions, making online mentoring a reality.  Experience report: Supported by the Center for Psychopedagogical Support of Students of Medicine (NAPEM), a mentoring program was structured in small groups, formed by teachers, more experienced students (co-mentors) and mentees (first to third year students) with meetings held remotely to enable participation, interaction and to welcome students. The program was attended by 13 mentors, 94 mentees and 24 co-mentors. The program included a training session with mentors and co-mentors, which was conducted by the NAPEM psychologist to align expectations and guidelines. Group discussions focused on difficulties in academic, professional and personal life.  Discussion: The advantages of the remote mentoring model are increased flexibility for mentors and mentees, facilitating their participation, and maintenance of the group connection supported by technology, since none of the mentees dropped out of the program. Weak points of this experience include the lack a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the program, for example through scientifically conducted interviews or questionnaires to produce better analysis of the results.  Conclusion: Remote mentoring is useful and should be included as a possible permanent legacy for medical courses, since the meetings were proven to be relevant to mentors and mentees and maintained a high rate of adherence throughout the program.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Mentores]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Educação Médica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Tutoria]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Pandemia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Mentors]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Mentoring]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Pandemic]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Buddeberg-Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K-D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Formal mentoring programmes for medical students and doctors - a review of the Medline literature]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Teach]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<page-range>248-57</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oxley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Briefing: Mentoring for doctors is a vague concept, though there seem]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>317</volume>
<page-range>3</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frei]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stamm]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Buddeberg-Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mentoring programs for medical students - a review of the PubMed literature 2000-2008]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMC Med Educ]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nimmons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giny]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosenthal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Medical student mentoring programs: current insights]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Adv Med Educ Pract]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>113-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Akinla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hagan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Atiomo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A systematic review of the literature describing the outcomes of near-peer mentoring programs for first year medical students]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMC Med Educ]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>98</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Snell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[When the learning environment is suboptimal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acad Med]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>89</volume>
<page-range>608-17</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benbassat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Changes in wellbeing and professional values among medical undergraduate students: a narrative review of the literature]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Adv Heal Sci Educ]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<page-range>597-610</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Coulehan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Conflicting professional values in medical education]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Camb Q Healthc Ethics]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<page-range>7-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SWA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pei]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sng]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yap]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Toh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A framework for mentoring of medical students: thematic analysis of mentoring programmes between 2000 and 2015]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Adv Heal Sci Educ]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>671-97</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Skjevik]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boudreau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ringberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schei]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stenfors]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kvernenes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Group mentorship for undergraduate medical students - a systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Perspect Med Educ]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<page-range>272-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gonçalves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MCN]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bellodi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mentors also need support: a study on their difficulties and resources in medical schools]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sao Paulo Med J]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>130</volume>
<page-range>252-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farkas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allenbaugh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bonifacino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Corbelli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mentorship of US medical students: a systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Gen Intern Med]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<page-range>2602-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
