<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1984-6444</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Educação UFSM]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Educação. Santa Maria]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1984-6444</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidade Federal de Santa Maria]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1984-64442014000200013</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Autoavaliação x autonotação: aproximações e afastamentos na formação de professores autorregulados]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Self-assessment versus self-grading: approaches to the education of self-regulated teachers.]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ribeiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Elizabete Aparecida Garcia]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Punhagui]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Giovana Chimentão]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nadia Aparecida de]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A13">
<institution><![CDATA[,IUniversidade Norte do Paraná  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A13">
<institution><![CDATA[,IIUniversidade Estadual de Londrina  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>02</numero>
<fpage>403</fpage>
<lpage>414</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1984-64442014000200013&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1984-64442014000200013&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1984-64442014000200013&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[O desenvolvimento de habilidades docentes pressupõe ações que proporcionem maior responsabilidade e autonomia à aprendizagem. Uma dessas ações é a promoção de atividades autoavaliativas, permitindo consciência da situação da aprendizagem e planejamento de intervenções. Este estudo concentrou-se em determinar o potencial autorregulatório, nas práticas autoavaliativas, realizadas em um curso de Pedagogia. A pesquisa de abordagem qualitativa, na modalidade estudo de caso, contou com a participação de 56 discentes, do último ano do curso de uma universidade pública paranaense. As informações, dos questionários e entrevistas, foram submetidas à análise de conteúdo, permitindo constatar que a maioria dos participantes tem consciência das finalidades da autoavaliação, mas vivenciam a proposição de atividades autonotativas, ou seja, de atribuição de nota para compor média. As práticas realizadas não proporcionam o desenvolvimento de habilidades autorregulatórias]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The development of teacher skills estimates actions which provides more responsibility and autonomy towards learning. One of these actions is to promote self-assessment activities, contributing to better awareness of one’s own learning and planning of interventions. This study focused on determining the potential for self-regulation of learning in self-assessment practices carried out in an undergraduate Pedagogy course. The research is qualitative, using the case study technique. Fifty-six students from the final year of the course at a public university in Paraná participated in the study. Information from questionnaires and interviews was submitted for content analysis, revealing that most participants were aware of the purposes of self-assessment, but they were found to be conducting self-grading activities, which consists on grading one’s own work in order to calculate a grade point average. The practices performed in the course do not encourage the development of self-regulatory skills]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Autoavaliação]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Autorregulação]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Formação de Professores]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Self-Assessment]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Self-Regulation of Learning]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Teacher Education]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h2>Autoavalia&ccedil;&atilde;o  x autonota&ccedil;&atilde;o: aproxima&ccedil;&otilde;es e afastamentos na forma&ccedil;&atilde;o de professores  autorregulados.</h2> <h3>Self-assessment versus self-grading: approaches to  the education of self-regulated teachers.</h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>Elizabete  Aparecida Garcia Ribeiro, Giovana Chiment&atilde;o Punhagui, Nadia Aparecida de  Souza    <br> </h4> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>399-413</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>641-657</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Action In Teacher Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>49-57</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-10</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Minas Gerais ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Arts Education Policy Review]]></source>
<year></year>
<numero>111</numero>
<issue>111</issue>
<page-range>105-111</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Cadernos de Saúde Pública]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>237-248</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Australasian Journal of Early Childhood]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>122-130</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Revista Diálogo Educacional]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Cadernos de Pesquisa]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>126</numero>
<issue>126</issue>
<page-range>689-698</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Linhas Críticas]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>22</numero>
<issue>22</issue>
<page-range>1-21</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
