<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2178-4612</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Conjectura: Filosofia e Educação]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Conjectura: filos. e Educ.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2178-4612</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidade de Caxias do Sul]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2178-46122023000100209</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18226/21784612.v28.023028</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="it"><![CDATA[Meditazioni Pascaliane e Meditazioni Cartesiane]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Pascalian Meditations and Cartesian Meditations]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Meditações Pascalianas e Meditações Cartesianas]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferraguto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Federico]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,PUCPR Programa de pós-graduação em Filosofia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>28</volume>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2178-46122023000100209&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2178-46122023000100209&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2178-46122023000100209&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="it"><p><![CDATA[Abstract L&#8217;articolo sviluppa un&#8217;indagine sul concetto di habitus in Bourdieu e Husserl a partire dalla contrapposizione di due stili filosofici differenti, uno (quello cartesiano) basato sull&#8217;affermazione dell&#8217;autotrasparenza della ragione e uno (quello pascaliano) che mette al suo centro un&#8217;individualità aperta all&#8217;infinito, esposta alla imprevedibilità della concretezza e vincolata a un &#8216;ordine&#8217; che ne scandisce l&#8217;esistenza e ne determina la consistenza. Al di là di una possibile contrapposizione, lo stesso Bourdieu sostiene una possibile integrazione fra questi due approcci. In questo articolo cercherò di esplicitare il senso di questa integrazione mostrando in che modo la riflessione husserliana sull&#8217;habitus confermi la conclusione di Bourdieu. In un primo momento descriverò meditazioni cartesiane e meditazioni pascaliane come due stili contrapposti (§§ 2-3). Mi dedicherò poi a un&#8217;analisi di alcuni passaggi rilevanti nella riflessione husserliana sull&#8217;abitudine sviluppata in Esperienza e giudizio (§ 4), con l&#8217;obiettivo di mettere in luce la relazione tra habitus e motivazioni razionali, e in Idee 2, con quello di mostrare come la formazione di tali motivazioni permetta di chiarire le relazioni tra ego puro, individuo e soggetto empirico (§5). Infine, mostrerò come la contrapposizione tra meditazioni pascaliane e meditazioni cartesiane si risolve in realtà in un meditare leibniziano, che di fatto Husserl e Bourdieu condividono (§ 6).]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract The paper develops an investigation of the concept of habitus in Bourdieu and Husserl from the opposition of two different philosophical styles, one (the Cartesian one) based on the affirmation of the self-transparency of reason and one (the Pascalian one) that places at its center an individuality open to infinity, exposed to the unforeseeability of concreteness and bound to an &#8216;order&#8217; that punctuates its existence and determines its consistency. Beyond a possible opposition, Bourdieu himself argues for a possible integration between these two approaches. In this article I will try to make explicit the meaning of this integration by showing how Husserlian reflection on habitus confirms Bourdieu&#8217;s conclusion. At first I will describe Cartesian meditations and Pascalian meditations as two opposing styles (§§ 2-3). I will then turn to an analysis of some relevant passages in the Husserlian reflection on habitus developed in Experience and Judgment (§4), with the aim of highlighting the relation between habitus and rational motivations, and in Ideas 2, with that of showing how the formation of such motives allows us to clarify the relations between pure ego, individual and empirical subject (§5). Finally, I will show how the opposition between Pascalian meditations and Cartesian meditations actually resolves into Leibnizian meditating, which in fact Husserl and Bourdieu share (§6).]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo O artigo apresenta uma investigação sobre o conceito de habitus em Bourdieu e Husserl, partindo da oposição de dois estilos filosóficos diferentes, sendo um (o cartesiano) baseado na afirmação da autotransparência da razão e outro (o pascaliano) que coloca em seu centro uma individualidade aberta ao infinito, exposta à imprevisibilidade da concretude e vinculada a uma "ordem" que marca sua existência e determina sua consistência. Além de uma possível oposição, o próprio Bourdieu defende uma possível integração entre essas duas abordagens. Neste artigo, tentarei tornar explícito o sentido dessa integração, mostrando como a reflexão husserliana sobre o habitus confirme a conclusão de Bourdieu. Em primeiro lugar, descreverei as meditações cartesianas e pascalianas como dois estilos opostos (§§ 2-3). Em seguida, analisarei algumas passagens relevantes da reflexão husserliana sobre o habitus, desenvolvida em Experiência e juízo (§4), com o objetivo de destacar a relação entre habitus e motivação racional, e em Ideias 2, com o objetivo de mostrar como a formação de tais motivações nos permite esclarecer a relação entre ego puro, indivíduo e sujeito empírico (§5). Por fim, mostrarei como a oposição entre as meditações pascalianas e as meditações cartesianas é, na verdade, resolvida em uma meditação leibniziana, que de fato Husserl e Bourdieu compartilham (§6).]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="it"><![CDATA[Husserl, E.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="it"><![CDATA[Bourdieu, P.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="it"><![CDATA[Fenomenologia trascendentale]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="it"><![CDATA[Habitus]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Husserl, E.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Bourdieu, P.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Transcendental phenomenology]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Habitus]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Husserl, E.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Bourdieu, P.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Fenomenologia transcendental]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Habitus]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[AIELLO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Tarde, Adorno e Bourdieu. Tre modelli di impiego filosofico-sociale del concetto leibniziano di monade]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Lo sguardo. Rivista di Filosofia]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>133-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BÉGOUT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Esquisse d&#8217;une théorie phénoménologique de l&#8217;habitude]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Alter]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<page-range>173-90</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BERGMANN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HOFFMANN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Habitualität als Potentialität: zur Konkretisierung des Ich bei Husserl]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Husserl Studies]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>281-305</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BERTINETTO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La forza dell´immagine]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Milano ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BIRAULT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Science et métaphysique chez Descartes et chez Pascal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Archives de Philosophie]]></source>
<year>1964</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>3/4</numero>
<issue>3/4</issue>
<page-range>483-526</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOURDIEU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Il senso pratico]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Roma ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOURDIEU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La distinzione]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bologna ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOURDIEU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Meditazioni Pascaliane]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Milano ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Feltrinelli]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOURDIEU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Response to Throop and Murphy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anthropological Theory]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>209</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOURDIEU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sociologia generale. Sistema, habitus, campo]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Milano ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Mimesis]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOURDIEU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Risposte. Per un&#8217;antropologia riflessiva]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Boringhieri ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Torino]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CAMINADA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Vom Gemeingeist Zum Habitus: Husserls Ideen II: Sozialphilosophische Implikationen Der Phänomenologie]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Dordecht-Boston ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARLISLE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[On Habit]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CROSSLEY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Pierre Bourdieu&#8217;s Habitus]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SPARROW]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUTCHINSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A History of habit]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<page-range>269-85</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Lexington ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Lexington Books]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FICHTE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften]]></source>
<year>1964</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Frommann-Holzboog ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FRANKS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[All or nothing]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FUNKE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHMANDT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Gewohnheit]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Archiv Für Begriffsgeschichte]]></source>
<year>1961</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<page-range>7-606</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GORSKI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Just How Pascalian are the &#8220;Pascalian Meditations&#8221;? Critical Reflections on the Theological Unconscious of Bourdieusian Theory]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sociology of Religion]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>77</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>280-96</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HACKING]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Science de la science chez Pierre Bourdieu]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOUVERESSE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROCHE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La Liberté par la connaissance. Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002)]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<page-range>147-62</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Jacob]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HOLENSTEIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Phänomenologie der Assoziation. Zu Struktur und Funktion eines Grundprinzips der passiven Genesis bei E. Husserl]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[DenHaag ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[M. Nijhoff]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cartesianische Meditationen]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Strasser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hrsg. Von S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Werke]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<page-range>41-184</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nijhoff ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Den Haag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Efahrung und Urteil]]></source>
<year>1939</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Academia ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Praag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologischen Untersuchungen zur Konsitutuion]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Biemel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. Biemel]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[HUSSERL, E. Gesammelte Werke, Bd. IV]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<page-range>1</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Den Haag ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Pariser Vorträge]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Werke]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<edition>Bd. I</edition>
<page-range>1-40</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Den Haag ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KOKOSZKA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Le devenir commun : corrélation, habitualité et typique chez Husserl]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Olms ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hildesheim]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LAFONTAINE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Quid de l&#8217;habitus ?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revue de l&#8217;Institut de Sociologie]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<numero>86</numero>
<issue>86</issue>
<page-range>119-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GREBE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Meditation über Husserls Wort : Die Geschichte ist das grosse Faktum des absoluten Seins]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tijdschrift voor Filosofie]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<numero>36</numero>
<issue>36</issue>
<page-range>107-26</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LANDGREBE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reduktion und Monadologie &#8211; die umstrittenen Grundbegriffe von Husserls Phänomenologie]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LANDGREBE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Faktizität und Individuation]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<page-range>88-101</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Meiner ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MONTAVONT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[De la passivité chez Husserl]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Puf]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PASCAL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Pensieri]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Einaudi ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PERREAU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Le monde social selon Husserl]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Dordrecht ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PINTO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Une perspective leibnizienne en sociologie: la monadologie sociale de Pierre Bourdieu]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Le Philosophoire]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<numero>50</numero>
<issue>50</issue>
<page-range>163-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROBBINS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La Philosophie et Les Sciences Sociale: Bourdieu, Merleau-Ponty et Husserl]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cités]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<numero>51</numero>
<issue>51</issue>
<page-range>17-31</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SPINICCI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[I pensieri dell&#8217;esperienza. Interpretazione di &#8220;&#8220;Esperienza e giudizio&#8221;&#8220; di Edmund Husserl]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Firenze ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[La Nuova Italia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TESTA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Habits]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Throop]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Murphy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Bourdieu and phenomenology. A critical assessment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anthropological Theory]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>185-207</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WRIGHT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ideas of habit and custom in early modern philosophy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>18-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZAHAVI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Self-Awareness and Alterity. A Phenomenological Investigation]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Evanston ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Northwestern University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
