<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2178-4612</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Conjectura: Filosofia e Educação]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Conjectura: filos. e Educ.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2178-4612</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidade de Caxias do Sul]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2178-46122023000100210</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18226/21784612.v28.e023028</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Solipsismo e epoché temática na Quinta Meditação Cartesiana de Husserl]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Solipsism and thematic epoché in Husserl&#8217;s Fifth Cartesian Meditation]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taddei]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paulo Mendes]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,UFRJ Instituto de Psicologia Departamento de Psicologia Geral e Experimental]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>28</volume>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2178-46122023000100210&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2178-46122023000100210&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2178-46122023000100210&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo Na Quinta Meditação Cartesiana, Husserl notoriamente tenta dissipar a ilusão do &#8220;solipsismo transcendental&#8221;. Entre as muitas dificuldades que este texto apresenta, pretendo reconstruir duas delas: a vagueza acerca da noção de solipsismo e a ambiguidade relativa ao procedimento da epoché temática e à sua dimensão fenomenológica. Ao analisar ambos os problemas, almejo oferecer esclarecimentos que são necessários para qualquer avaliação do sucesso de Husserl na Quinta Meditação. Seguindo uma linha de interpretação existente na literatura secundária a que chamo de Interpretação de Dupla Tarefa, sustento que existem dois métodos diferentes que recebem o nome de &#8220;epoché temática&#8221; bem como duas tarefas diferentes sendo perseguidas por Husserl: uma estática e uma genética. Procedo da seguinte forma: primeiramente (seção I), contextualizo o objetivo de Husserl na Quinta Meditação vis-à-vis algumas posições clássicas na literatura secundária; posteriormente (seção 2), reconstruo a vagueza que afeta a noção de solipsismo, em e para além de Husserl; depois disso (seção 3), apresento como a epoché temática, tal como oferecida na Quinta Meditação, é ambígua, uma ambiguidade que também se relaciona com a imprecisão da noção de solipsismo; analisando uma breve passagem textual de Intersubjektivität III, esboço então (Seção 4) a Interpretação da Dupla Tarefa para a Quinta Meditação, mostrando suas vantagens e os seus desafios gerais; concluo, finalmente (Seção 5) considerando as vantagens da Interpretação de Dupla Tarefa para a avaliação do sucesso de Husserl na Quinta Meditação.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract In the Fifth Cartesian Meditation, Husserl notoriously attempts to dispel the illusion of &#8220;transcendental solipsism&#8221;. Among the many difficulties this text presents, I intend to reconstruct two of them: the vagueness concerning the notion of solipsism, and the ambiguity relating to the thematic epoché and its phenomenological dimension. In analyzing both issues, I strive to offer clarifications which are necessary for any assessment of Husserl&#8217;s success in the Fifth Meditation. Following a line of interpretation extant in the secondary literature which I call the Double-Task Interpretation, I maintain there are two different methods going by the name &#8220;thematic epoché&#8221;, as well as to two different tasks being pursued by Husserl: a static and a genetic one. I proceed as follows: I first (Sect. I) contextualize Husserl&#8217;s goal in the Fifth Meditation vis-à-vis some classical positions in the secondary literature; I then (Sect. 2) reconstruct the vagueness affecting the notion of solipsism, both within and beyond Husserl; after that (Sect. 3), I present how the thematic epoché, as offered in the Fifth Meditation, is ambiguous, an ambiguity which also relates to the vagueness of the notion of solipsism; analyzing a short textual passage from Intersubjektivität III, I then (Sect. 4) outline the Double-Task Interpretation of the Fifth Meditation, showing its general advantages and challenges; I finally (Sect. 5) conclude by considering the advantages of the Double-Task Interpretation for the assessment of Husserl&#8217;s success in the Fifth Meditation.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Husserl]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Epoché Temática]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Alteridade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Solipsismo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Meditações Cartesianas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Husserl]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Thematic Epoché]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Alterity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Solipsism]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cartesian Meditations]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[AVRAMIDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Other Minds]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[[s.l.] ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The &#8220;Fifth Meditation&#8221; and Husserl&#8217;s Cartesianism]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophy and Phenomenological Research]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>14-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HEINÄMAA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cartesian Meditations: Husserl&#8217;s Pluralistic Egology]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[JACOBS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Husserlian Mind]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<page-range>38-49</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[[s.l.] ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ideen zur einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstituition]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hua IV ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Haag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ideen zur einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie &#8211; Drittes Buch: Die Phänomenologie und die Fundamente der Wissenschaften]]></source>
<year>1971</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hua V. Den Haag ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Martinus-Nijhoff]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität: Erster Teil: 1905-1920]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<month>a</month>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hua XIII ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Den Haag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hua XIV]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität: Zweiter Teil: 1921-1928]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<month>b</month>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Den Haag ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Martinus-Nijhoff]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität &#8211; Dritter Teil:]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<month>c</month>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hua XV ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Den Haag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Formale und Transzendentale Logik: Versuch einer Kritik der Logischen Vernunft]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hua XVII ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Den Haag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und Phänomenologishen Philosophie &#8211; Erstes Buch &#8211; Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hua III/1 ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Den Haag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie. Vorlesungen 1906/07]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hua XXIV ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Dordrecht]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUSSERL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hua I ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Kluwer Academic]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUTCHENSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Husserl&#8217;s Fifth Meditation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Man and World]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>265-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KERN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Einleitung des Herausgebers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität: Dritter Teil: 1929-1935]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<page-range>XV-LXX</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hua XV ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Martinus-Nijhoff]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.-I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Static-phenomenological and Genetic-phenomenological Concept of Primordiality in Husserl&#8217;s Fifth Cartesian Meditation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Husserl Studies]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>165-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MENSCH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Intersubjectivity and Transcendental Idealism]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[s.l. ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[SUNY Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MERLEAU-PONTY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Phénoménologie de la Perception]]></source>
<year>1945</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[[s.l.] ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Gallimard]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MORAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Husserl&#8217;s Crisis of the European Sciences: An Introduction]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SARTRE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.-P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[L&#8217;être et le néant: Essai d&#8217;ontologie phénomenologique]]></source>
<year>1943</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[s.l. ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Gallimard]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHÜTZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Das Problem der transzendentalen Intersubjektivität bei Husserl]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Aufsätze III:]]></source>
<year>1971</year>
<page-range>86-118</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Haag ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Martinus-Nijhoff]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SMITH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Routledge philosophy guidebook to Husserl and the Cartesian Meditations]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[[s.l.] ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STAEHLER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[What is the Question to Which Husserl&#8217;s Fifth Cartesian Meditation is the Answer?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Husserl Studies]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>99-117</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WELTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Other Husserl: The Horizons of Transcendental Phenomenology]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[s.l. ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Indiana University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZAHAVI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Husserl&#8217;s Intersubjective Transformation of Transcendental Philosophy]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WELTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The New Husserl: A Critical Reader]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<page-range>233251</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bloomington &amp; Indianapolis ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Indiana University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
