<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0102-4698</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Educação em Revista]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Educ. Rev.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0102-4698</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Faculdade de Educação da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0102-46982011000100010</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Livros didáticos de biologia do ensino Médio: resultados do PNLEM/2007]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El-Hani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Charbel Niño]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roque]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nádia]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rocha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pedro Luís Bernardo da]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A10">
<institution><![CDATA[,UFBA  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>01</numero>
<fpage>211</fpage>
<lpage>240</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0102-46982011000100010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0102-46982011000100010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0102-46982011000100010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Em 2005, os livros didáticos de Biologia do ensino médio publicados no Brasil foram avaliados, como parte do Programa Nacional do Livro para o Ensino Médio (PNLEM). Neste artigo, relatamos resultados dessa avaliação. Os critérios e o processo de avaliação são apresentados de modo detalhado, bem como os principais problemas das obras não-recomendadas para compra pelo MEC e os principais aspectos positivos das obras recomendadas. Das 18 obras submetidas à avaliação, nove satisfizeram os critérios mínimos de qualidade para aprovação. Sete obras didáticas excluídas apresentaram problemas em todas as classes de critérios de avaliação. Todas as nove obras excluídas exibiram problemas relativos à correção e adequação conceituais, e à precisão da informação básica fornecida. As qualidades mais frequentes nas obras recomendadas diziam respeito à adequação metodológica e à construção do conhecimento. Não encontramos evidências claras de que a frequência de escolha pelos professores do ensino médio refletiu a qualidade dos itens avaliados, conforme estabelecida pela equipe que analisou as obras.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[In 2005, Brazilian Biology high school textbooks were evaluated as part of the National Program for the High School Textbook (PNLEM). In this paper, we report results of this evaluation. The evaluation criteria and processes are presented in a detailed manner, as well as the main flaws found in the textbooks not recommended to be bought by the Ministry of Education and the main positive aspects of the approved materials. Nine out of 18 textbooks satisfied the minimum quality criteria for approval. Seven excluded textbooks showed problems in all classes of evaluation criteria. All nine excluded textbooks exhibited problems related to conceptual correctness and adequacy, and accuracy of basic information. The most frequent qualities of approved textbooks concerned aspects of methodological adequacy and knowledge construction. We found no clear evidence that the frequency of choice of the approved textbooks by the high school teachers reflected the quality of the evaluated items, as established by the team which evaluated the textbooks.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Livros Didáticos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Ensino de Biologia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Ensino Médio]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[PNLEM]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Textbooks]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Biology Teaching]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[High School]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[PNLEM]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <h2><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Livros did&aacute;ticos de biologia  do ensino m&eacute;dio: resultados do PNLEM/2007.</font></h2> <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h3>High school biology textbooks: results from PNLEM/2007.</h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>Charbel Ni&ntilde;o El-Hani, N&aacute;dia  Roque, Pedro Lu&iacute;s Bernardo da Rocha    <br> </h4> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Research in Science Teaching]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>34</volume>
<page-range>39-55</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Curriculum Inquiry]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>401-423</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Revista Iberoamericana de Educación]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Science & Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>29-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Ensaio: Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>1-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Science & Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>15-28</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Ciência & Educação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>125-153</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Research in Science Teaching]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>249-270</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Science Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>74</volume>
<page-range>541-554</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Ciência & Educação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>9</volume>
<page-range>147-157</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Ciência & Educação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>89-106</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
