<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1517-9702</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Educação e Pesquisa]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Educ. Pesqui.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1517-9702</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1517-97022014000300005</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O desempenho das universidades brasileiras na perspectiva do Índice Geral de Cursos (IGC)]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoffmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Celina]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zanini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Roselaine Ruviaro]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Corrêa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ângela Cristina]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siluk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Julio Cezar Mairesse]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schuch Júnior]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vitor Francisco]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ávila]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lucas Veiga]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A05">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Federal de Santa Maria  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A05">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>03</numero>
<fpage>651</fpage>
<lpage>666</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1517-97022014000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1517-97022014000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1517-97022014000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[A educação superior exerce papel fundamental no desenvolvimento econômico de determinado país, no que condiz ao atendimento das demandas da sociedade. A qualidade no contexto da educação superior tem sido tema recorrente nos últimos anos, sobretudo a partir da criação do Sistema Nacional de Avaliação da Educação Superior (SINAES), que instituiu um sistema de avaliação institucional global e integrador condizente a todas as Instituições de Ensino Superior (IES) brasileiras, sendo responsável por produzir índices para mensuração da qualidade como o Indicador de Diferença dentre os Desempenhos Observado e Esperado (IDD), o Conceito Preliminar de Curso (CPC) e o IGC, Índice Geral de Cursos, que mede o desempenho global da instituição. Diante disso, este estudo tem como objetivo analisar o IGC das universidades públicas e privadas das cinco regiões brasileiras, no intuito de caracterizar o desempenho das IES por região e verificar possíveis discrepâncias intra e inter-regionais identificando oportunidades de melhoria. Os resultados evidenciaram desempenho superior das universidades públicas em todas as regiões, tendo maior destaque as regiões norte e sudeste. Quanto à variabilidade, as regiões Centro-Oeste e Norte apresentaram os melhores desempenhos ambos condizentes ao setor privado. No entanto, para realizar uma avaliação consolidada do desempenho das IES por região faz-se necessário analisar, de forma integrada, os resultados do IGC alinhados aos demais subsistemas de avaliação que integram a avaliação multidimensional do SINAES.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Higher education plays a fundamental role in the economic development of a country in terms of meeting society's demands. Quality in higher education has been a recurring theme in recent years, especially after the creation of National Higher Education Assessment System (SINAES), which established a global and integrative institutional assessment system in line with all Brazilian Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), responsible for producing quality measurement indicators such as Indicator of Difference between Expected and Observed Performance (IDD), Preliminary Course Program Score (CPC), and General Course Index IGC, which measures the overall performance of a higher education institution. Thus, this study aims to analyze the IGC of public and private universities of the five Brazilian regions in order to describe the performance of HEIs by region, identify possible intraregional and interregional discrepancies, and suggest opportunities for improvement. The results showed that public universities outperformed private ones in all regions, particularly the north and southeast regions. Regarding variability, private universities had the best performance in the center-west and north of Brazil. However, a thorough assessment of the performance of HEIs by region requires an integrative analysis of IGC results aligned with other assessment subsystems that integrate the multidimensional assessment of SINAES.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Qualidade na Educação Superior]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Desempenho do IGC nas Regiões Brasileiras]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação de Instituições de Educação Superior]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Quality in Higher Education]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Performance for IGC in Brazilian Regions]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Assessment of Higher Education Institutions]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h2>O  desempenho das universidades brasileiras na perspectiva do &Iacute;ndice Geral de  Cursos (IGC)</h2> <h3>Performance of Brazilian universities in view of the  General Course Index (IGC).</h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>Celina Hoffmann, Roselaine Ruviaro Zanini, &Acirc;ngela  Cristina Corr&ecirc;a, Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk, Vitor Francisco Schuch J&uacute;nior,  Lucas Veiga &Aacute;vila    <br> </h4> </font>      ]]></body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>863-868</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>147-166</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Estudos em Avaliação Educacional]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>39</numero>
<issue>39</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Educação e Sociedade]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>88</numero>
<issue>88</issue>
<page-range>795-817</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>427-454</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>195-224</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>817-825</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Caderno Cedes]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>78</numero>
<issue>78</issue>
<page-range>257-269</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>869-873</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>267-290</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>299-316</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Estudos em Avaliação Educacional]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>51</numero>
<issue>51</issue>
<page-range>168-189</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Revista Brasileirade Pós-Graduação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>193-213</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Estudos: Revista da Associação Brasileira de Mantenedoras de Ensino Superior]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>38</numero>
<issue>38</issue>
<page-range>9-22</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Estudos em Avaliação Educacional]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>40</numero>
<issue>40</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>267-290</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
