<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0104-026x</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Estudos Feministas]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Estud. Fem.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0104-026x</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas e Centro de Comunicação e Expressão da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0104-026x2013000100014</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Masculinidade hegemônica: repensando o conceito]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Connell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Messerschmidt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[James W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A14">
<institution><![CDATA[,University of Sydney  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A14">
<institution><![CDATA[,University of Southern Maine  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>01</numero>
<fpage>241</fpage>
<lpage>282</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0104-026x2013000100014&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0104-026x2013000100014&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0104-026x2013000100014&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[O conceito de masculinidade hegemônica tem influenciado os estudos de gênero em vários campos acadêmicos, mas ao mesmo tempo tem atraído um sério criticismo. Os autores traçam a origem do conceito a uma convergência de ideias no início dos anos 1980 e mapeiam as formas através das quais o conceito foi aplicado quando os estudos sobre homens e masculinidades se expandiram. Avaliando as principais críticas, os autores defendem o conceito de masculinidade como fundamental, uma vez que, na maioria das pesquisas que o opera, seu uso não é reificador nem essencialista. Entretanto, as críticas aos modelos assentados em características de gênero e às tipologias rígidas são sólidas. O tratamento do sujeito em pesquisas sobre masculinidades hegemônicas pode ser melhorado com a ajuda dos recentes modelos psicológicos, mesmo que os limites à flexibilidade discursiva devam ser reconhecidos. O conceito de masculinidade hegemônica não equivale a um modelo de reprodução social; precisam ser reconhecidas as lutas sociais nas quais masculinidades subordinadas influenciam formas dominantes. Por fim, os autores revisam o que foi confirmado por formulações iniciais (a ideia de masculinidades múltiplas, o conceito de hegemonia e a ênfase na transformação) e o que precisa ser descartado (tratamento unidimensional da hierarquia e concepções de características de gênero). Os autores sugerem a reformulação do conceito em quatro áreas: um modelo mais complexo da hierarquia de gênero, enfatizando a agência das mulheres; o reconhecimento explícito da geografia das masculinidades, enfatizando a interseccionalidade entre os níveis local, regional e global; um tratamento mais específico da encorporação1 em contextos de privilégio e poder; e uma maior ênfase na dinâmica da masculinidade hegemônica, reconhecendo as contradições internas e as possibilidades de movimento em direção à democracia de gênero.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The concept of hegemonic masculinity has influenced gender studies across many academic fields but has also attracted serious criticism. The authors trace the origin of the concept in a convergence of ideas in the early 1980s and map the ways it was applied when research on men and masculinities expanded. Evaluating the principal criticisms, the authors defend the underlying concept of masculinity, which in most research use is neither reified nor essentialist. However, the criticism of trait models of gender and rigid typologies is sound. The treatment of the subject in research on hegemonic masculinity can be improved with the aid of recent psychological models, although limits to discursive flexibility must be recognized. The concept of hegemonic masculinity does not equate to a model of social reproduction; we need to recognize social struggles in which subordinated masculinities influence dominant forms. Finally, the authors review what has been confirmed from early formulations (the idea of multiple masculinities, the concept of hegemony, and the emphasis on change) and what needs to be discarded (onedimensional treatment of hierarchy and trait conceptions of gender). The authors suggest reformulation of the concept in four areas: a more complex model of gender hierarchy, emphasizing the agency of women; explicit recognition of the geography of masculinities, emphasizing the interplay among local, regional, and global levels; a more specific treatment of embodiment in contexts of privilege and power; and a stronger emphasis on the dynamics of hegemonic masculinity, recognizing internal contradictions and the possibilities of movement toward gender democracy.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Masculinidade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Hegemonia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Gênero]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Poder Social]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Agência]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Encorporação]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Globalização]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Hegemony]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Gender]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Social Power]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Agency]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Embodiment]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Globalization]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h2>Masculinidade hegem&ocirc;nica: repensando o conceito.</h2> <h3>Hegemonic masculinity:  rethinking the concept.</h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>Robert W. Connell, James  W. Messerschmidt    <br> </h4> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Feminism & Psychology]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>79-105</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Ethnic Studies]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>29-44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Gender, Work and Organization]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>129-142</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Gender, Place and Culture]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>245-260</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Gender & Society]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>120-132</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Sport, Education and Society]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>143-159</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Social Justice]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>155-176</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Sport, Education and Society]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>199-212</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Rural Sociology]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>65</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>562-581</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Theory and Society]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>551-604</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Gender, Work and Organization]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>2-22</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Men and Masculinities]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>3-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Men’s Studies]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>249-266</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Men and Masculinities]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>347-364</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Feminist Media Studies]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>27-46</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Japanese Studies]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>189-200</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Theory and Society]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>643-657</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Psychoanalytic Review]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>73</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Masculinities]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>34-55</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Marriage and Family Living]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>227-233</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Women in Culture and Society]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>649-685</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Feminist Theory]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>49-72</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Sociology of Sport Journal]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-17</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Theoretical Criminology]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>63-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[American Behavioral Scientist]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>46</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1439-1458</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Feminism & Psychology]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>11-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Sport, Education and Society]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>163-176</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Gender & Society]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>472-474</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Organizations]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>587-618</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[English in Australia]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>112</volume>
<page-range>11-24</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Theory and Society]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>675-695</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Masculinities]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>1-22</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Social Issues]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>29-47</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Southern African Studies]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>605-630</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Gender, Place and Culture]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>375-390</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Sex Research]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>60-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Men and Masculinities]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>54-69</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Crime, Law and Social Change]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>171-186</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Berkeley Journal of Sociology]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>37</volume>
<page-range>29-54</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>697-702</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Gender and Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>289-303</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of the Sociology of Law]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>115-130</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Inclusive Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>207-222</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Feminism and Psychology]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>335-356</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Gender, Work, and Organization]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>58-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
