<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1414-4077</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação (Campinas)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1414-4077</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Publicação da Rede de Avaliação Institucional da Educação Superior (RAIES), da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) e da Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1414-40772011000100007</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O desafio da avaliação de equipes de alta capacitação e autonomia: o caso do credenciamento de docentes na pós-graduação]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Otavio Prospero]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lucia Helena Aponi]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A07">
<institution><![CDATA[,FGV  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A07">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Metodista de São Paulo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A07">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Bandeirante de São Paulo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>01</numero>
<fpage>123</fpage>
<lpage>147</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1414-40772011000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1414-40772011000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1414-40772011000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[A avaliação de equipes de alta capacitação e autonomia representa tradicionalmente um grande desafio para os gestores das organizações. Em particular, quando a estratégia da organização demanda o realinhamento da equipe, o sucesso da iniciativa pode não ser facilmente atingido mesmo que os gestores disponham de alto poder coercitivo, uma vez que os processos são executados com autonomia pela equipe, tornando difícil a efetiva monitorização e controle, dificuldade que se potencializa pela alta capacitação dos membros da equipe. Adicionalmente, o emprego do poder coercitivo pode ter o reflexo negativo da queda do desempenho pelas reações individuais ou articuladas, típicas da resistência à mudança. Consequentemente, o comprometimento dos membros de uma equipe de alta capacitação e autonomia pode requerer o uso de técnicas que atendam a necessidades individuais como a manutenção do nível de reconhecimento prévio junto ao grupo. Este trabalho trata da apresentação de técnica que simultaneamente permite objetivar o alinhamento da equipe e promover o reforço de percepções importantes para o comprometimento de indivíduos com esse perfil tais como reputação, autonomia e estabilidade, que contribuem para o sucesso em ações que alinhem indivíduos aos objetivos da organização, reduzindo a resistência à mudança. O trabalho discorre sobre os aspectos teóricos da tensão gerada pela necessidade de alinhamento de uma equipe com essas características e as implicações no nível do indivíduo, apresentando em seguida uma proposta de condução dessa situação conduzida com base no método de pesquisa-ação em um programa de pós-graduação stricto-sensu no Brasil.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The evaluation of highly qualified and autonomous teams traditionally represents a major challenge for managers of organizations. Particularly when the strategy of the organization demands the realignment of the team, the success of the initiative may not be easily achieved even if the managers possess high coercive power, since the processes are executed independently by the team, making it difficult to effectively monitor and control, a difficulty which is intensified by the high qualification of the team members. Furthermore, the use of coercive power may have the negative effect of the decrease in performance by individual or articulated reactions, typical of the resistance to change. Consequently, the commitment of members of a highly qualified and autonomous team may require the use of techniques that meet the individual needs such as maintaining the level of prior recognition by the group. This work presents a technique that allows to simultaneously aim for the alignment of the team and promote the reinforcement of perceptions important to the commitment of individuals with this profile, such as reputation, independence and stability, which contribute to the success of actions that align individuals to the objectives of the organization, reducing resistance to change. The paper addresses the theoretical aspects of the tension generated by the need to align a team with these characteristics and implications at the individual level, then presenting a proposal to conduct this situation based on the research action method in a stricto sensu graduate program in Brazil.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Alinhamento de Equipes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Equipes Autônomas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Gestão de Equipes Altamente Capacitadas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Team Alignment]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Autonomous Teams]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Management of Highly Qualified Teams]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h2>O desafio da avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o de  equipes de alta capacita&ccedil;&atilde;o e autonomia: o caso do credenciamento de docentes  na p&oacute;s-gradua&ccedil;&atilde;o.</h2> <h3>The challenge of evaluating teams of high capacity and autonomy: the  case of accreditation of professors in graduate programs.</h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>Otavio Prospero Sanchez,  Lucia Helena Aponi Sanchez    <br> </h4> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BAUMEISTER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEARY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Bulletin]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>117</volume>
<page-range>497-529</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BENBASAT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GOLDSTEIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MEAD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The case research strategy in studies of information systems.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[MIS Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>369-386</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Minnesota ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DE CREMER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BLADER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[European Journal of Social Psychology]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>211-228</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DIENER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Psychologist]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>34-43</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FISCHHOFF]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Value elicitation: is there anything in there?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Psychologist]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>835-847</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FISS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZAJAC]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The symbolic management of strategic change: sensegiving via framing and decoupling.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Academy of Management Journal]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1173-1193</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York City ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GAVIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MASON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The virtuous organization: The value of happiness in the workplace.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Organizational Dynamics]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>379-392</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[San Francisco ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GLIMCHER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RUSTICHINI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Neuroeconomics: the consilience of brain and decision.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Science]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>306</volume>
<numero>5695</numero>
<issue>5695</issue>
<page-range>447-452</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HALLER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HADLER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Social Indicators Research]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<page-range>169-216</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MILLER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Psychological Review]]></source>
<year>1956</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<page-range>81-97</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NG]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[From preference to happiness: towards a more complete welfare economics.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Social Choice and Welfare]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>307 -350</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PARKER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BALTES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[YOUNG]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Organizational Behavior]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<page-range>389-416</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SAATY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Mathematical Psychology]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>234-281</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[San Francisco ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SAATY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[How to make a decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[European Journal of Operational Research]]></source>
<year>Sep.</year>
<month> 1</month>
<day>99</day>
<volume>48</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>9-26</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[San Francisco ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SPAGNOLO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SOUZA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O que mudar na avaliação da Capes?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>8-34</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasilia ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SUSMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[EVERED]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[An assessment of the scientific merits of action research.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Administrative Science Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>582-603</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZAHEDI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Group consensus function estimation when preferences are uncertain.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Operations Research]]></source>
<year>Nov-</year>
<month>De</month>
<day>c,</day>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>883-894</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Mariland ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
