<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1414-4077</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação (Campinas)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1414-4077</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Publicação da Rede de Avaliação Institucional da Educação Superior (RAIES), da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) e da Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1414-40772011000200008</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Validade e confiabilidade de instrumento de avaliação da docência sob a ótica dos modelos de equação estrutural]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Amilton Barreto de]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lanzer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edgar Augusto]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tambosi Filho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Elmo]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Otávio Próspero]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernardi Junior]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Plínio]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A08">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A08">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Metodista de São Paulo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A08">
<institution><![CDATA[,Fundação Getúlio Vargas de São Paulo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>02</numero>
<fpage>375</fpage>
<lpage>401</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1414-40772011000200008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1414-40772011000200008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1414-40772011000200008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Este artigo relata um estudo sobre as propriedades de confiabilidade e validade de instrumento de avaliação da docência, utilizando técnicas de análise fatorial exploratória e confirmatória. A hipótese inicial é que o modelo de avaliação da docência da Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina é formado por oito dimensões correlacionadas: exigência, avaliação, conteúdo, método, relacionamento professor aluno, produtividade, ética e relacionamento professor curso. Estudos confirmatórios revelaram, no entanto, que o modelo apresentava alguns indicadores estatísticos não adequados. Reavaliando a estrutura do instrumento por meio da técnica de análise fatorial exploratória, evidenciou-se uma estrutura com apenas quatro fatores correlacionados, quais se-jam: competência, relacionamento e ética, motivação e avaliação. Submetida a testes através de técnicas de análise confirmatória, essa estrutura revelou índices de ajuste global, incremental e de parcimônia adequados sob o ponto de vista estatístico.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This article describes a study on the features concerned with the validity and reliability of the faculty evaluation tool by using corroboratory and exploratory factorial analyses tecniques. The first hypothesis put forward is that the faculty evaluation model of the Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina consists of eight correlated dimensions: requirement, evaluation, content, method, professor-student rapport, productivity, ethics and professor-course rapport. Corroboratory studies, however, have shown that the model displayed some inadequate statistical indexes. By re-evaluating the structure of the tool through an exploratory factorial analysis technique, a structure with only four correlated factors; competence, rapport and ethics, motivation and evaluation, became evident. This structure, put to the test through corroboratory analysis techniques, showed indexes of global, incremental and parsimony adjustments as being ideal from the statistical standpoint.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Instrumento Avaliação]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Confiabilidade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Validade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Tool Evaluation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Reliability]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Validity]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h2>Validade e confiabilidade de  instrumento de avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o da doc&ecirc;ncia sob a &oacute;tica dos modelos de equa&ccedil;&atilde;o  estrutural.</h2> <h3>Validity and reliability of the faculty evaluation tools from the  strutural equation model perspective.</h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>Amilton Barreto de Bem,  Edgar Augusto Lanzer, Elmo Tambosi Filho, Ot&aacute;vio Pr&oacute;spero Sanchez,  Pl&iacute;nio Bernardi Junior    <br> </h4> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BENTLER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BONETT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Significance tests and googness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Bulletin]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>88</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>588-606</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COHEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Student rating of instruction and student achievement: a metaanalysis of multisection validity studies.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Review of Educational Research]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<page-range>281-309</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GREIMEL-FUHRMANN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GEYGER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Student´s evaluation of teachers and instructional quality analysis of relevant factors based on empirical evaluation research.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>229-238</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARSH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Goodness-of-bit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Bulletin]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>103</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>391-410</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARSH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BALLA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MCDONALD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Goodness-offir indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Bulletin]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>103</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>391-410</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MATEO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G, M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERNÁNDEZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Análisis confirmatório de la estructura dimensional de um cuestionário para la evaluación de la calidad de la enseñanza.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Investigaciones Psicológicas]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>73-80</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MCDONALD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARSH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Choosing a multivariate model: noncentrality and goodness of fit.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Bulletin]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<numero>107</numero>
<issue>107</issue>
<page-range>247-55</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MULAIK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indexes for structural equation models.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Bulletin]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>105</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>340 445</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RAMOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. M. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Validacion de construto en el ambito pedagogico.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Española de Pedagogia]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>174</volume>
<page-range>535-554</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TUCKER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEWIS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychometrika]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-10</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[California ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
