<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1414-4077</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Avaliação (Campinas)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1414-4077</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Publicação da Rede de Avaliação Institucional da Educação Superior (RAIES), da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) e da Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1414-40772014000100014</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação de redes de pesquisa e colaboração]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leite]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Denise]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caregnato]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Célia Elizabete]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lima]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Elizeth Gonzaga dos Santos]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pinho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Isabel]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miorando]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bernardo Sfredo]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Priscila Bier da]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A14">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A14">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade do Estado de Mato GrossoSul  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A14">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade de Aveiro  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>01</numero>
<fpage>291</fpage>
<lpage>312</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1414-40772014000100014&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1414-40772014000100014&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1414-40772014000100014&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[O setor acadêmico brasileiro vive um momento de estresse quantitativista. Docentes e pesquisadores são avaliados pelas métricas individuais de sua produção bibliográfica. Apesar de sua importância, a colaboração no trabalho de pesquisa em grupo, nas redes de pesquisa, ainda não constitui objeto de avaliação sistemática. Medem-se os produtos, mas os processos que os geram permanecem desconhecidos. Este estudo objetivou construir marcadores para a avaliação de processos interativos de trabalho em redes de pesquisa. Entendemos que este tipo de rede se estabelece quando um grupo colabora com a intenção de produzir conhecimento. A literatura consultada apontou que, embora tal interação possa ser representada graficamente, há ainda número reduzido de trabalhos sobre o tema da avaliação de redes de pesquisa e colaboração ou de parceria em pesquisa. A partir da teoria, desenvolvemos uma metodologia de análise de currículos de pesquisadores com uso de softwares para construção de planilhas de dados, contagem de coautorias e análise de redes sociais. Estas técnicas permitiram a elaboração de planilhas da produção bibliográfica dos pesquisadores, de grafos representando suas redes e a construção de um protocolo de avaliação de redes de colaboração e pesquisa. Os sujeitos investigados foram pesquisadores 1A do CNPq, líderes de grupo de pesquisa nas áreas de Educação, Engenharia de Produção e Física. Os resultados identificam 10 marcadores/indicadores quali-quantitativos para avaliação de processos de pesquisa em rede que foram testados e validados em contexto de aplicação.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The Brazilian academic sector is experiencing a period of quantitativist stress. Teachers and researchers are individually evaluated by the metrics of their bibliographical production. Despite its importance, the collaboration inside the research groups, in research networks, is not subject to systematic review. Products are measured, but the processes that generate them remain unknown. This study, supported by CNPq, aimed to build markers for the evaluation of interactive processes work in research networks. We understand that a research network is established when a group collaborates with the intention of producing knowledge. The literature pointed out that although such interaction can be graphically represented there is still small number of papers on the topic of evaluation of research networks and collaboration or about evaluation of research partnerships. From the theory, we developed a methodology for analyzing the curricula of researchers employing software to build spreadsheets, count co-authorships, and analyze social networks. These techniques allowed the preparation of data spreadsheets on the researchers’ bibliographical production, graphs representing their networks and the construction of an evaluation protocol for collaborative research networks. The investigated subjects were CNPq 1A researchers leading research groups in the areas of Education, Production Engineering and Physics. The results identify 10 markers, qualitative and quantitative indicators for evaluating research processes on networks, which have been tested and validated in the context of application.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Redes Pesquisa]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Colaboração Científica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Indicadores Avaliação]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Research Networks]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Scientific Collaboration]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Indicators]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h2>Avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o  de redes de pesquisa e colabora&ccedil;&atilde;o.</h2> <h3>Evaluation of collaborative research networks.</h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>Denise  Leite, C&eacute;lia Elizabete Caregnato, Elizeth Gonzaga dos Santos Lima, Isabel  Pinho, Bernardo Sfredo Miorando, Priscila Bier da Silveira    <br> </h4> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Ciências da Informação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>64-77</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Cadernos de Saúde Pública]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>16</volume>
<page-range>37-51</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>263-281</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>167-184</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Research Policy]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>42</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>211-219</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brighton ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>18-31</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Belo Horizonte ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira da Pós-Graduação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>35 - 64</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Redes - Revista Hispana para el análisis de redes sociales]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>1-15</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>98</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>404-409</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Santa Fe ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[SIAM Review]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>167-256</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Philadelphia ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Studies in Higher Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>38</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>425-440</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Perspectivas em Ciências da Informação]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>42-55</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Belo Horizonte ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Annual Review of Sociology]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>243-270</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Palo Alto ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
