<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1981-5271</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Bras. Educ. Med.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1981-5271</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1981-52712021000300212</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1981-5271v45.3-20200444.ing</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Teachers and students&#8217; perceptions about feedback in clinical internships in medical school]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Percepções de docentes e discentes sobre feedback em estágios práticos no curso de medicina]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stagini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Simone]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lena Vânia Carneiro]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[São Caetano do Sul São Paulo]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1981-52712021000300212&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1981-52712021000300212&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1981-52712021000300212&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract:  Introduction:  In medical education, feedback is considered one of the main types of formative assessment. Feedback can be defined as the transmission of information by observing students in action aiming to provide improvement for the acquisition of medical skills that constitute medical professionalism.  Objective: The aim of this study was to assess if there are difficulties in transmitting and receiving feedback by preceptors and students during the practical stages of medical training.  Methods: This qualitative / quantitative design study involved all students who completed the internship from March 2018 to August 2019 (n = 50), as well as all preceptors responsible for the internships (n = 9) at Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul. Knowledge about feedback, according to the viewpoint of students and preceptors, was assessed using adapted questionnaires with categorical and open questions. Descriptive analyses were used for the quantitative data and the content technique for the qualitative data.  Results: The preceptors report that the objectives of providing feedback are to point out improvement, critical reflection, and opportunity for adjustments. Meanwhile, students report: clarification of doubts, planning for improvements and knowledge of positive points. Half of the preceptors claim to provide very frequent feedback, but students would like to receive feedback more often. Students want feedback to be constructive and private. Half of the preceptors find it difficult to give negative feedback; however, 60% of the students report handling criticism well.  Conclusion: The preceptors declare to have knowledge of and know about the objectives of giving feedback; however, they have difficulties communicating it, especially when it involves criticisms for the correction of behaviors and attitudes. The students accept criticism and would like feedback to be conveyed more often in the practical stages. It is necessary to improve the process of providing and receiving feedback.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo:  Introdução: No ensino médico, feedback - ou devolutiva - é um dos componentes principais da avaliação formativa. Feedback pode ser definido como transmissão de uma informação quando se observam os estudantes em ação, a fim de propiciar melhorias para aquisição de competências médicas que compõem o profissionalismo médico.  Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar se há dificuldades de transmissão e recepção de feedback pelos preceptores e estudantes durante os estágios práticos do curso de Medicina.  Método: Este estudo de delineamento misto qualitativo/ quantitativo envolveu todos os discentes que concluíram os estágios no período de março de 2018 a agosto de 2019 (n = 50), assim como todos os preceptores responsáveis pelos estágios práticos (n = 9) da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul. O conhecimento sobre feedback, na visão dos discentes e preceptores, foi avaliado por meio de questionários adaptados com perguntas categóricas e abertas. Utilizaram-se análise descritiva nos dados quantitativos e técnica de conteúdo nos dados qualitativos.  Resultado: Os preceptores relataram que os objetivos de fornecer feedback são: apontamento de melhoria, reflexão crítica e oportunidade de adequações. Por sua vez, os estudantes relataram: esclarecimento de dúvidas, planejamento de melhorias e conhecimento de pontos positivos. Metade dos preceptores afirmou fornecer feedback, porém os estudantes gostariam de recebê-lo de forma mais contínua. Os estudantes desejam que o feedback seja construtivo e feito em local privado. Metade dos preceptores tem dificuldade em dar feedback negativo, porém 60% dos estudantes relataram lidar bem com críticas.  Conclusão: Os preceptores afirmaram ter conhecimento dos objetivos do feedback. Porém, eles têm dificuldades para transmiti-lo, principalmente quando envolve críticas para correções de comportamentos ou atitudes. Os estudantes aceitam críticas e requerem que o feedback seja transmitido com mais frequência nos estágios práticos. Há a necessidade de melhorar o processo de fornecer e receber feedback.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Education Measurement]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Formative Feedback]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Medical Education Undergraduate]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Faculty Medical]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Medical Students]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação Educacional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Feedback Formativo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Educação de Graduação em Medicina]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Docentes de Medicina]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Estudantes de Medicina]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pagliosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Da Ros]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[O relatório Flexner: para o bem e para o mal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Bras Educ Med]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>492-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Brasil</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Lei nº 8.080, de 19 de setembro de 1990. Dispõe sobre as condições para a promoção, proteção e recuperação da saúde, a organização e o funcionamento dos serviços correspondentes e dá outras providências]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Diário Oficial da União]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Brasil</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Resolução CNE/CES nº 4, de 7 de novembro de 2001. Institui Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do curso de graduação em Medicina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Diário Oficial da União]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<page-range>38</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Brasil</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Resolução CNE/CES nº 3, de 20 de junho de 2014. Institui Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Medicina e dá outras providências]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Diário Oficial da União]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<page-range>8-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Panúncio-Pinto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Almeida Troncon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Avaliação do estudante: aspectos gerais]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Medicina (Ribeirao Preto, Online)]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>314-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hardavella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aamli-Gaagnat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rousalova]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sreter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[How to give and receive feedback effectively]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Breathe (Sheff)]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>327-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Trocon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Avaliação do estudante de Medicina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Medicina (Ribeirao Preto Online)]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>429-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Albano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quadri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farooqui]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arangua]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clark]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Resident perspective on feedback and barriers for use as an educational tool]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cureus]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cantillon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sargeant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Giving feedback in clinical settings]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>337</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jamshidian]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Haghani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yamani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sabri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Provision of feedback to medical teachers on their educational performance: perspectives of internal medicine teachers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Adv Med Educ Pract]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>85-94</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khandelwal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Feedback in the emergency medicine clerkship]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[West J Emerg Med]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>537</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dent]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hunt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A practical guide for medical teachers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Elsevier Health Sciences]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação e percepção dos estudantes de Medicina sobre a mudança de atitude e desenvolvimento de competências a partir da utilização de feedback estruturado]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Fortaleza ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro Universitário Christus]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caregnato]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RCA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mutti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Pesquisa qualitativa: análise de discurso versus análise de conteúdo]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Texto &amp; Contexto Enferm]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>679-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sainsbury]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Craig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Qual Health Care]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>349-57</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burgess]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mellis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Feedback and assessment for clinical placements: achieving the right balance]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Adv Med Educ Pract]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>373</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O&#8217;Neil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lohse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Colletti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Bridging the gap to effective feedback in residency training: perceptions of trainees and teachers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMC Med Educ]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>225</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liberman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liberman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steinert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McLeod]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meterissian]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Teach]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>470-2</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nottingham]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Henning]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Feedback in clinical education, part II: approved clinical instructor and student perceptions of and influences on feedback]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Athl Train]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>58-67</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Branch Jr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paranjape]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acad Med]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>77</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
<page-range>1185-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Telio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ajjawi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Regehr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The &#8220;educational alliance&#8221; as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acad Med]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>90</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>609-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krackov]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Teach]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>787-91</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ntuli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[September]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NN]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sithole]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[South African podiatry students&#8217; perceptions of feedback given as part of clinical training]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Foot Ankle Res]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>36</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schartel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Giving feedback: an integral part of education]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>77-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Al-Mously]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nabil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Al-Babtain]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abbas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MAF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Undergraduate medical students&#8217; perceptions on the quality of feedback received during clinical rotations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Teach]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>^sSuppl 1</numero>
<issue>^sSuppl 1</issue>
<supplement>Suppl 1</supplement>
<page-range>S17-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
