<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1981-5271</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Bras. Educ. Med.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1981-5271</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1981-52712022000500203</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/1981-5271v46.supl.1-20220303</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Análise da adequação dos itens do Teste de Progresso em medicina]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Item analysis of Progress Test in medicine]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villela]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edlaine Faria de Moura]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hyppolito]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Miguel Angelo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moriguti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Julio Cesar]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bollela]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Valdes Roberto]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ribeirão Preto São Paulo]]></addr-line>
<country>Brasil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>46</volume>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1981-52712022000500203&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1981-52712022000500203&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1981-52712022000500203&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo:  Introdução:  A avaliação do estudante deve induzir aprendizagem e ser baseada em competência, ou seja, avaliar (habilidades cognitivas, psicomotoras e afetivas). Para avaliar conhecimento e a habilidade para sua utilização no contexto profissional, o Teste de Progresso (TP) tem sido usado em larga escala, com finalidade somativa e principalmente formativa.  Objetivo:  Este estudo teve como objetivo verificar a adequação e qualidade de itens que compõem os TP realizados pelos estudantes.  Método:  Trata-se de estudo exploratório descritivo e retrospectivo que analisou todos os itens de seis provas do TP aplicado a estudantes de Medicina do primeiro ao sexto ano da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto/USP, no período de 2013 a 2018. Os sete indicadores de boas práticas foram: 1. abordar tema relevante na formação médica; 2. ter enunciado maior que as alternativas; 3. avaliar aplicação do conhecimento; 4. definir pergunta clara para o item no enunciado; 5. avaliar apenas um domínio do conhecimento em cada item; 6. ter resposta correta e distratores homogêneos e plausíveis; 7. ausência de erros no item que acrescentam dificuldade desnecessária ou dão pistas da resposta correta. Dois avaliadores independentes analisaram as questões e, quando necessário, revisavam em conjunto os itens discordantes.  Resultado:  A análise das provas permitiu identificar boa qualidade técnica na maioria dos itens das seis provas, além de indicar que a não adesão foi mais frequente nos indicadores 4 e 5, que podem comprometer tanto a validade quanto a interpretação dos resultados da prova em termos de lacunas do conhecimento por parte dos estudantes.  Conclusão:  A qualidade das questões das provas analisadas é muito boa, mas foi possível identificar oportunidades de melhoria no processo de elaboração de itens, que servem de base para o desenvolvimento docente dos elaboradores da instituição.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract:  Introduction:  Assessment drives learning and should follow a competence-based approach. The Progress Test (PT) has been used on a large scale for summative and mainly formative purposes to assess knowledge and the ability to use it in the professional context.  Objective:  To check the adequacy and quality of the items and that make up the progress tests sat by students.  Method:  Descriptive and retrospective exploratory study that analyzed all the items of six PT exams applied to medical students from the first to the sixth year of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto/USP, from 2013 to 2018. The seven indicators of good practices were: 1. Addresses a relevant topic in medical training; 2. Statement longer than key answer and distractors; 3. Application of knowledge evaluated; 4.Clear lead-in defined for the item in the statement; 5. Only one domain of knowledge assessed in each item; 6.Plausible and homogeneous key answer and distractors; 7.Absence of flaws that add unnecessary difficulty or give clues to the correct answer. Two independent evaluators analyzed the items and, if necessary, they jointly reviewed any disagreement.  Result:  The analysis showed a good technical quality of most items in the six PT exams. In addition, they indicated that non-adherence was a bit more frequent for indicators 4 and 5, which can compromise both the validity and the interpretation of the test results in terms of knowledge gaps on the part of students.  Conclusion:  In general, the quality of the items was very good but there are some opportunities for improvement in the process of item writing based on faculty development within the institution.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Educação Médica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação Educacional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Questões de Prova]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Docentes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Educational Measurement]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Examination Questions]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Faculty]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Htwe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ismail]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Low]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GKK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparative assessment of students&#8217; performance and perceptions on objective structured practical models in undergraduate pathology teaching]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Singapore Med J]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>502-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schuwirth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LWT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Der Vleuten]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CPM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[General overview of the theories used in assessment: AMEE Guide No. 57]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Teach]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<page-range>783-97</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MPG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rangel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Avaliação: um impasse na educação médica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Bras Educ Med]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>213-22</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Norcini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bollela]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duvivier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Teach]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>206-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bates]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Konkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suddards]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dobson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pratt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Student perceptions of assessment and feedback inlongitudinal integrated clerkships]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Educ]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<page-range>362-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Swanwick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Wiley-Blackwell]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Norcini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bollela]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duvivier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Consensus framework for good assessment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Teach]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>1102-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bollela]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Borges]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Troncon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LEA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Avaliação somativa de habilidades cognitivas: boas práticas na elaboração de testes de múltipla escolha e na composição de exames]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Bras Educ Med]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>74-85</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wrigley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van der Vleuten]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CPM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Freeman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muijtjens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A systemic framework for the progress test: strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE Guide No. 71]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Teach]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>683-97</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sakai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferreira Filho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[OF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Almeida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mashima]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marchese]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Teste de progresso e avaliação do curso: dez anos de experiência da medicina da Universidade Estadual de Londrina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Bras Educ Med]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>254-63</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>National Board of Medical Examiners</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Construindo o teste escrito: questões para ciências básicas e clínicas]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Filadélfia ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[NBME]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bloom]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Taxonomy of educational objectives]]></source>
<year>1956</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[David Mckay]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verhoeven]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van der Steeg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scherpbier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muijtjens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verwijnen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van der Vleuten]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reliability and credibility of an angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing using recent graduates as judges]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Educ]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>832-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verhoeven]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Snellen-Balendong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HAM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van der Linde]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blitz-Lindeque]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The versatility of progress testing assessed in an internatio- nal context: a start for benchmarking global standardization?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Teach]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>514-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lahner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schauber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lorwald]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kropf]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guttormsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Measurement precision at the cut score in medical multiple choice exams: theory matters]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Perspect Med Educ]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>220-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romão]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Como elaborar questões de múltipla escolha de boa qualidade]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Femina]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>561-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LeClaire]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Destephano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lerner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CCG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Decisions and consequences: Validation of High-Stakes Simulation-Based Assessments in Gynecologic Surgery]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Minim Invasive Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>1285-90</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pinheiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[OL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spadella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moreira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ribeiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ZMT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guimaraes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[APC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Almeida Filho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[OM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Teste de Progresso: uma ferramenta avaliativa para a gestão acadêmica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Bras Educ Med]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>68-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tombi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ECNA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zukowsky-Tavares]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferreira-Gerab]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Qualidade dos itens de múltipla escolha utilizados em um teste de progresso]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Estud Aval Educ]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>33</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tavakol]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dennick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Post-examination analysis of objective tests]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Teach]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>447-58</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hafferty FW]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O&#8217;Brien BC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tilburt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Beyond high-stakes testing: learner trust, educational commodification, and the loss of medical school professionalism]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acad Med]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>95</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>833-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
