<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1982-596x</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Educação e Filosofia]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Educação e Filosofia]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1982-596x</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidade Federal de Uberlândia]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1982-596x2017000200985</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14393/revedfil.issn.0102-6801.v31n62a2017-p985a1009</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O hábito da reprodução de teorias: produção e ensino de filosofia no Brasil contemporâneo]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The practice of reproducing theories: creating and teaching Philosophy in contemporary Brazil]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[El hábito de la reproducción de las teorías: producción y enseñanza de Filosofía en el Brasil contemporáneo]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Suze Oliveira]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Federal do ABC Programa de Pós Graduação em Filosofia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>62</numero>
<fpage>985</fpage>
<lpage>1009</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1982-596x2017000200985&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1982-596x2017000200985&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1982-596x2017000200985&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo O artigo tem como objeto principal apresentar a tendência à reprodução de teorias filosóficas em nossas universidades e escolas, bem como o impacto negativo dessa prática na formação do filósofo e na própria presença da Filosofia no Brasil. Para tanto, considera-se a tradição latino-americana que discorre desde os anos 1960 sobre a existência de Filosofia na América Latina, o que possibilitou uma crítica da forma brasileira de se relacionar com a tradição do pensamento filosófico ocidental. A prática da produção persistente de comentários filosóficos das teorias consagradas se mostra inadequada como modelo para o pensar, disso só decorre uma modalidade de conhecimento estéril que incentiva a subserviência, a ausência de pensamento e a alienação. O saldo desse cenário é que em todos os níveis da educação formal há uma heteronomia generalizada que contraria por princípio a própria natureza da atitude filosófica e as diretrizes de ensino de Filosofia no País.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract The main objective of this article is to present the tendency used in Brazilian universities and schools to reproduce philosophical theories, as well as the negative impact that this practice has on the education of new philosophers and the presence of Philosophy itself in Brazil. To achieve this, we consider the Latin American tradition that since the 1960s has deliberated the existence of Philosophy in Latin America, making it possible to form a critique, from the point of view of how Brazilians relate to the tradition of western philosophical thinking. The practice of persistently producing only philosophical commentaries of consecrated theories appears to be inadequate as a model for this line of thought, as the result is sterile knowledge that encourages subservience, an absence of thought and estrangement. The outcome of this is that at all levels of formal education, there is a generalized heteronomy, which would contradict, in principle, the very nature of the philosophical attitude and the guidelines for teaching Philosophy in Brazil.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El artículo tiene como objeto principal presentar la tendencia a la reproducción de teorías filosóficas en nuestras universidades y escuelas, así como el impacto negativo de esa práctica en la formación del filósofo y en la propia presencia de la Filosofía en Brasil. Para ello, se considera la tradición latinoamericana que discurre desde los años 60 sobre la existencia de Filosofía en América Latina, lo que posibilitó una crítica de la forma brasileña de relacionarse con la tradición del pensamiento filosófico occidental. La práctica de la producción persistente de comentarios filosóficos de las teorías consagradas se muestra inadecuada como modelo para el pensar, de ello sólo se deriva una modalidad de conocimiento estéril que incentiva la subordinación, la ausencia de pensamiento y la alienación. El saldo de ese escenario es que en todos los niveles de la educación formal hay una heteronomía generalizada que contraría por principio la propia naturaleza de la actitud filosófica y las directrices de enseñanza de Filosofía en el país.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Reprodução de teorias]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Formação do filósofo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Brasil]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Reproducing theories]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Education philosophers]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Brazil]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[reproducción de teorías]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[formación del filósofo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Brasil]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALMEIDA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Nós os não-europeus - o pensamento na América Latina e a Não- Filosofia: um possível non rapport]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Páginas de Filosofia]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>1-2</numero>
<issue>1-2</issue>
<page-range>111-34</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Bernardo do Campo ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BONDY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Salazar]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Existe una filosofía de nuestra América]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Siglo XXI Editores]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CABRERA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Diário de um filósofo no Brasil]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Ijuí ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UNIJUÍ]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CASTRO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Vocabulário de Foucault]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Belo Horizonte ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Autêntica]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DUSSEL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[1492 o encobrimento do outro - A origem do mito da modernidade]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Perseu Abramo]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GOMES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Roberto]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica da razão tupiniquim]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[FTD]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KANT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KANT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A paz perpétua e outros opúsculos]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Edições 70]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FOUCAULT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[O governo de si e dos outros II - A coragem de verdade]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Martins Fontes]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NOBRE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marcos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Conversas com filósofos brasileiros]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora 34]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TRINDADE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vanderlei Luiz]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[O debate entre Salazar Bondy e Leopoldo Zea]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<page-range>159-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIEIRA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Priscila]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A coragem da verdade e a ética do intelectual em Michel Foucault]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Intermeios]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>ZEA</collab>
<source><![CDATA[La filosofía americana como filosofía sin más]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<edition>3</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Siglo XXI Editores]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
