<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1982-7199</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Eletrônica de Educação]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Elet. Educ.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1982-7199</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1982-71992019000301156</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14244/198271992870</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Práticas avaliativas: uma pesquisa nos cursos de formação docente]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Evaluative practices: A research in teacher training courses]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Prácticas evaluativas: una investigación en cursos de formación docente]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Neta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maria de Lourdes da Silva]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Magalhães Junior]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Antonio Germano]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bessa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marcos James Chaves]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará (IFCE)  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Fortaleza CE]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Fortaleza CE]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Centro Universitário Católica de Quixadá (Unicatólica)  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Quixadá CE]]></addr-line>
<country>Brasil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>1156</fpage>
<lpage>1169</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1982-71992019000301156&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1982-71992019000301156&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1982-71992019000301156&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo A avaliação possibilita a tomada de decisão promovendo o acompanhamento das ações de ensino, apontando o progresso dos discentes, assim como releva as lacunas no ensino e aprendizagem, fornecendo informações para os docentes, gestores e estudantes, dando ensejo ao aperfeiçoamento formativo no ensino superior. Com isso a pesquisa parte do seguinte questionamento: como se desenvolveram as práticas avaliativas dos professores nos cursos de licenciatura em História? O objeto da investigação aportou-se nas práticas avaliativas no ensino superior, de modo específico, em dois cursos de licenciatura. Objetivou-se compreender as práticas avaliativas nos cursos de licenciatura em História, conceituar avaliação do ensino e da aprendizagem e descrever as práticas avaliativas pautadas pelos coordenadores. A pesquisa, de caráter bibliográfico e de campo recorreu aos estudos de Cavalcante e Mello (2015), Moraes (2014), Tardif (2008), Viana (2012), dentre outros. A metodologia de abordagem qualitativa foi desenvolvida mediante entrevistas semiestruturadas com os gestores. As revelações dos gestores evidenciaram que avaliação era realizada pelos docentes, de modo autônomo, sem o auxílio das Coordenações, deixando de ser caracterizada como subsídio didático-pedagógico para fomentar melhorias no ensino e aprendizagem nos cursos de formação de professores, reduzindo-se a concepção de medida centrada na aplicação de instrumentos, na quantificação das aprendizagens e sem feedback aos estudantes.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract The evaluation enables making decision by monitoring educational actions, pointing out the progress of students, as well as highlighting the gaps in teaching and learning, providing information for teachers, managers and students, giving opportunities for further training in higher education. With this, the research starts from the following question: how did the evaluative practices of the teachers in the Degree in History? The object of the research was based on evaluative practices in higher education, specifically in two undergraduate courses. The objective was to understand the evaluation practices in undergraduate courses in History, to conceptualize evaluation of teaching and learning and to describe the evaluation practices carried out by the coordinators. The research, of bibliographical and field character, has used the studies of Cavalcante and Mello (2015), Moraes (2014), Tardif (2008), Viana (2012) and others. The methodology of qualitative approach was developed through semi-structured interviews with the managers. The managers' revelations evidenced that the evaluation was carried out by the teachers, autonomously, without the assistance of the Coordination, being no longer characterized as didactic-pedagogical subsidy to foster improvements in teaching and learning in teacher training courses, reducing to measurement conception focused on the application of instruments, on the quantification of learning and without the conception of measurement focused on the application of instruments, the quantification of learning and without feedback students.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen La evaluación posibilita la toma de decisiones promoviendo el acompañamiento de las acciones de enseñanza, apuntando el progreso de los alumnos, así como releva las lagunas en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje, proporcionando informaciones para los docentes, gestores y estudiantes, dando lugar al perfeccionamiento formativo en la enseñanza superior. Con ello la investigación parte del siguiente cuestionamiento: cómo se desarrollaron las prácticas de evaluación de los profesores en los cursos de licenciatura en Historia? El objeto de la investigación se aportó en las prácticas evaluativas en la enseñanza superior, de modo específico, en dos cursos de grado. Se objetivó comprender las prácticas evaluativas en los cursos de licenciatura en Historia, conceptuar la evaluación de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje y describir las prácticas de evaluación realizadas por los coordinadores. La investigación, de carácter bibliográfico y de campo recurrió a los estudios de Cavalcante y Mello (2015), Moraes (2014), Tardif (2008), Viana (2012) y otros. La metodología de abordaje cualitativo fue desarrollada mediante entrevistas semiestructuradas con los gestores. Las revelaciones de los gestores evidenciaron que la evaluación era realizada por los docentes, de modo autónomo, sin el auxilio de las Coordinaciones, dejando de ser caracterizada como subsidio didáctico-pedagógico para fomentar las mejoras en la enseñanza y aprendizaje en los cursos de formación de profesores, reduciéndose concepción de medida centrada en la aplicación de instrumentos, en la cuantificación de los aprendizajes y sin retroalimentación estudiantes.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Práticas avaliativas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Ensino e aprendizagem]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Formação docente]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Gestores]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Teaching-learning assessment]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Teacher education]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Managers]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Enseñanza-aprendizaje]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Evaluación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Formación docente]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Administradores.]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOGDAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BIKLEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Porto ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Porto]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CAVALCANTE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. P. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MELLO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Avaliação da aprendizagem no ensino de graduação em Saúde: concepções, intencionalidades, reflexões]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>423-42</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas; Sorocaba, SP ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FONSECA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Didática e prática de ensino de História: experiências, reflexões e aprendizados]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas, SP ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Papirus]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LUCKESI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação da aprendizagem escolar]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cortez]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MINAYO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. C. de S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[O desafio da pesquisa social]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<edition>30</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Petrópolis ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Vozes]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MORAES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. A. F. de.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Prova: instrumento avaliativo a serviço da regulação do ensino e da aprendizagem]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Est. Aval. Educ.]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>49</numero>
<issue>49</issue>
<page-range>233-58</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MOREIRA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RANGEL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A correção como processo avaliativo: diferentes percepções em diálogo]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Est. Aval. Educ]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>62</numero>
<issue>62</issue>
<page-range>520-40</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[POLTRONIERI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CALDERÓN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Avaliação da aprendizagem na educação superior: a produção científica da revista Estudos em Avaliação Educacional em questão]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>467-87</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas; Sorocaba, SP ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SILVA NETA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. de L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MAGALHÃES JUNIOR]]></surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Práticas avaliativas na formação docente: teoria e prática]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Horizontes]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>38-48</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TARDIF]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Saberes docentes e formação profissional]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<edition>9</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Petrópolis ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Vozes]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIANA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. M. Q. Q.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reflexões sobre avaliação da aprendizagem na visão de alunos de graduação]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[D&#8217;ÁVILA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VEIGA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I. P. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Didática e docência na educação superior: implicações para a formação de professores]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<page-range>61-82</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Papirus]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VILLAS BOAS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. M. de]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Portfólio, avaliação e trabalho pedagógico]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Campinas ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Papirus]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WERLE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. O. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação em larga escala: foco na escola]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Liber Livros]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
