<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1984-5987</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Childhood & Philosophy]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Child.philo.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1984-5987</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1984-59872016000200371</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12957/childphilo.2016.22964</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[El lenguaje de la norma y los individuos frágiles]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The language of the standard and fragil individuals.]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[A linguagem da norma e os indivíduos frágeis.]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Skliar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></addr-line>
<country>Argentina</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>24</numero>
<fpage>371</fpage>
<lpage>389</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1984-59872016000200371&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1984-59872016000200371&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1984-59872016000200371&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  En este texto se aborda la cuesti&#243;n del cuerpo en tanto campo de batalla entre la normalidad y la belleza de un lado, y la singularidad, la soledad y la fragilidad de otro lado. La cuesti&#243;n reside en comprender cu&#225;l es la diferencia entre aquellos cuerpos -y lenguajes- que son hablados en relaci&#243;n a aquellos cuerpos -y lenguajes- que hablan. Quiz&#225; no sea &#233;sta una cuesti&#243;n final, que finaliza, pero nos presenta una complejidad de todas las cuestiones aqu&#237; parcialmente formuladas, y vuelve imprescindible una noci&#243;n de cuerpo completamente distinta. Una noci&#243;n de cuerpos en relaci&#243;n, donde no exista ning&#250;n vestigio acerca de lo que falta o de lo que hace falta. El fin de la idea del cuerpo normal. Huir de la obligaci&#243;n de juzgar. El encuentro con el otro, sin condiciones. La transformaci&#243;n del uno mismo en alteridad. La raz&#243;n que nos asiste para definir al otro sujeto se ha desvanecido casi por completo, pulverizada en sus argumentos y hecha jirones en su naturalizaci&#243;n. Ya no hay sujeto-uno o, para mejor decir, nunca hubo un sujeto auto-centrado, omnisciente, capaz de rellenarse y hacerse absoluto, completo. Es esta la raz&#243;n a desmitificar. Ser capaces de una teor&#237;a de la debilidad, de lo fragmentario, de la vulnerabilidad, de lo incompleto y no ya como condici&#243;n precaria, de agon&#237;a, sino como aquello que nos hace humanos. Con esa intenci&#243;n se aborda la cuesti&#243;n de la locura, la debilidad mental y la barbarie, a trav&#233;s de un recorrido de textos filos&#243;ficos y literarios que, quiz&#225;, compongan una posible teor&#237;a de la fragilidad. ]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  This text addresses the question of the body as battleground between normality and beauty, and, on the other hand, uniqueness, loneliness and fragility. The question is to understand what is the difference between those bodies - and languages - that are spoken about and those bodies - and languages - speaking. Maybe this is not a final question, which ends, but one that presents a complexity of all the issues here partially formulated, and is drives essential a completely different notion of body. A notion of bodies in relation, where there is no trace about lacking or what is missing.The end of normal body idea. Escape from the duty to prosecute. The encounter with the other, without conditions. The transformation of the self in otherness.The reason which helps us to define the other subject faded almost completely, sprayed in their arguments and shattered in its naturalization. There is no longer a united subject or, better to say, there has never been a subject self-centered, all-knowing, able to fill up and make itself absolute, complete. This is the reason to demystify. Being capable of a theory of weakness, the fragmentary, the vulnerability of incomplete and no longer as poor condition of agony, but as one that makes us human. With this intention, it is discussed the issue of insanity, mental weakness and barbarism, through a pathway of philosophical and literary texts that, perhaps, compose a possible theory of fragility. ]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo Neste texto se aborda a quest&#227;o do corpo enquanto campo de batalha entre a normalidade e a beleza de um lado, e a singularidade, a solid&#227;o e a fragilidade de outro lado. A quest&#227;o reside em compreender qual &#233; a diferen&#231;a entre aqueles corpos - e linguagens - que s&#227;o falados em rela&#231;&#227;o &#224;queles corpos - e linguagens - que falam. Talvez n&#227;o seja esta uma quest&#227;o final, que finaliza, mas que nos apresenta uma complexidade de todas as quest&#245;es aqui parcialmente formuladas, e torna imprescind&#237;vel uma no&#231;&#227;o de corpo completamente diferente. Uma no&#231;&#227;o de corpos em rela&#231;&#227;o, onde n&#227;o exista nenhum vest&#237;gio acerca do que falta ou do que faz falta. O fim da ideia do corpo normal. Fugir da obriga&#231;&#227;o de julgar. O encontro com o outro, sem condi&#231;&#245;es. A transforma&#231;&#227;o do si mesmo em alteridade. A raz&#227;o que nos assiste para definir ao outro sujeito se desvaneceu quase por completo, pulverizada em seus argumentos e despeda&#231;ada em sua naturaliza&#231;&#227;o. J&#225; n&#227;o h&#225; sujeito-uno ou, para melhor dizer, nunca houve um sujeito autocentrado, onisciente, capaz de encher-se e fazer-se absoluto, completo. &#201; esta a raz&#227;o a desmitificar. Ser capazes de uma teoria da debilidade, do fragment&#225;rio, da vulnerabilidade, do incompleto e n&#227;o j&#225; como condi&#231;&#227;o prec&#225;ria, de agonia, mas como aquele que nos faz humanos. Com essa inten&#231;&#227;o se aborda a quest&#227;o da loucura, a debilidade mental e a barb&#225;rie, atrav&#233;s de um percurso de textos filos&#243;ficos e liter&#225;rios que, talvez, componham uma poss&#237;vel teoria da fragilidade.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Cuerpo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Debilidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Fragilidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Normalidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Body]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Weakness]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Fragility]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Normality]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Corpo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Debilidade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Fragilidade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Normalidade]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
