<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1984-6444</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Educação UFSM]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Educação. Santa Maria]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1984-6444</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidade Federal de Santa Maria]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1984-64442018000300369</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5902/1984644430084</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Students&#8217; survey for assessing HE teachers&#8217; work - advantages and disadvantages]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Pesquisa de estudantes para a avaliação do trabalho dos es professores - vantagens e desvantagens]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Janusheva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Violeta]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pejchinovska]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Milena]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Talevski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jove D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,&#8220;St. Kliment Ohridski&#8221; University Faculty of Education ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Republic of Macedonia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,&#8220;St. Kliment Ohridski&#8221; University Faculty of Education ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Republic of Macedonia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,&#8220;St. Kliment Ohridski&#8221; University Faculty of Education ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Republic of Macedonia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>369</fpage>
<lpage>392</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1984-64442018000300369&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1984-64442018000300369&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1984-64442018000300369&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract A self-evaluation survey is one of the basic tools used by every higher education institution for the purpose of identifying and improving the quality of its educational services. A relevant segment of the self-evaluation procedure is the work of the HE teacher; the assessment is provided via a survey filled in by each course student&#8217;s attendants respectively. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to show the advantages and disadvantages of the students&#8217; survey as a part of the self-evaluation process at the &#8220;Sv. Kliment Ohridski&#8221; University in Bitola, Republic of Macedonia. The research has a qualitative paradigm, i.e. the twelve survey statements within this survey are analyzed regarding the impact they have on the validity and objectivity of the results to be provided about the HE teachers&#8217; work quality, and regarding their relevance in the multidimensional teaching construct. The research has also a quantitative paradigm, i.e. an analysis of the opinions of 100 HE teachers of this University about the effects of the students&#8217; survey answers on their teaching, and an analysis of 200 students of this University about the efficiency of the survey they fill in. The research has a descriptive design. The methods used for processing the data and for gaining conclusions consist of analyses, syntheses and comparison. The research results indicate that besides the advantages, this students&#8217; survey has numerous disadvantages that should be taken into account because they influence both the validity and the objectivity of the grade given to the HE teachers&#8217; work. It consequently imposes the need for urgent revision of the survey questions.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo Uma pesquisa de autoavalia&#231;&#227;o &#233; uma das ferramentas b&#225;sicas usadas por todas as institui&#231;&#245;es de ensino superior com o prop&#243;sito de identificar e melhorar a qualidade dos servi&#231;os educacionais. Parte relevante do procedimento de autoavalia&#231;&#227;o &#233; o trabalho do professor ES; a avalia&#231;&#227;o &#233; realizada atrav&#233;s de um question&#225;rio preenchido por cada estudante de cada curso, respectivamente. O objetivo deste artigo &#233; mostrar as vantagens e desvantagens do question&#225;rio de avalia&#231;&#227;o aplicado aos estudantes como parte do processo de autoavalia&#231;&#227;o da Universidade "Sv. Kliment Ohridski&#8221; em Bitola, na Maced&#244;nia. Este trabalho de pesquisa segue o modelo qualitativo, sendo que as doze perguntas feitas na avalia&#231;&#227;o s&#227;o analisadas sob a &#243;tica do impacto que elas tem na validade e objetividade dos resultados a serem fornecidos sobre a qualidade dos professores HE, e em fun&#231;&#227;o da relev&#226;ncia na constru&#231;&#227;o de um ensino multidimensional. Tamb&#233;m inclui um modelo quantitativo, como na an&#225;lise das op&#231;&#245;es dos 100 professores HE desta Universidade, sobre os efeitos das respostas dos estudantes no seu ensino, e uma an&#225;lise dos 200 estudantes da Universidade sobre a efici&#234;ncia do question&#225;rio que responderam. A pesquisa tem um desenho descritivo. O m&#233;todo usado para o processamento dos dados e an&#225;lise dos resultados buscando conclus&#245;es significativas consiste em an&#225;lise, s&#237;ntese e compara&#231;&#227;o. Os resultados da pesquisa indicam que al&#233;m das vantagens, este question&#225;rio dos estudantes tem in&#250;meras desvantagens que deveriam ser levadas em considera&#231;&#227;o, porque influenciam ambos, a validade e a objetividade da nota atribu&#237;da ao trabalho dos professores HE. Consequentemente, urge a necessidade de revis&#227;o das perguntas do question&#225;rio.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Students]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Survey statements]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[HE teachers]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Assessment objectivity and validity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Estudantes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Questionário]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Profesores de ensino superior]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Objetividade de avaliação e validade]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BERAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIOLATO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Student Ratings of Teaching Effectiveness: Student Engagement and Course Characteristics]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Journal of Higher Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BERAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T. N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROKOSH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Consequential Validity of Student Ratings: What do Instructors Really Think]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Alberta Journal of Educational Research]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>497-511</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HOYT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PALLETT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Appraising Teaching Effectiveness: Beyond Student Ratings]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Idea Center]]></source>
<year></year>
<numero>36</numero>
<issue>36</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KELLY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness: Considerations for Ontario Universities]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[COU Academic Colleagues Discussion Paper]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARSH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W. H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROCHE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Making Students' Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness Effective. The Critical Issues of Validity, Bias, and Utility]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Psychologist]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>52</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>1187-197</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[OTANY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[JOON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CHO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) in Higher Education: How to Use SET More Effectively and Efficiently in Public Affairs Education]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Public Affairs Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>531-44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PARPALA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LINDBLOM-YLÄNNE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RYTKÖNEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Students&#8217; conceptions of good teaching in three different disciplines]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SELDIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[How Colleges Evaluate Professors, 1983 vs. 1993]]></source>
<year></year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ POD Network Conference Materials]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc> </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TALEVSKI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[JANUSHEVA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Aspekti na ocenuvanjeto [Aspects of assessment]]]></source>
<year></year>
<edition>1st</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bitola ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[&#8220;Sv. Kliment Ohridski&#8221; University, Faculty of Education]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Tolkoven rechnik na makedonskiot jazik</collab>
<collab>Tolkoven rechnik na makedonskiot jazik</collab>
<source><![CDATA[[Monolingual dictionary of the Macedonian language]]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Skopje ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Institut za makedonski jazik &#8220;K. Misirkov&#8221;]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Zakon za visokoto obrazovanie</collab>
<collab>Zakon za visokoto obrazovanie</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Konsolidiran tekst. &#8222;Sluzhben vesnik na Republika Makedonija]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Official Journal of the Republic of Macedonia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
