<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2178-5201</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Acta Scientiarum. Education]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Acta Scientiarum. Education]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2178-5201</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2178-52012013000200008</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Ranqueamento de universidades: reflexões acerca da construção de reconhecimento institucional]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moura]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bruno Azevedo]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moura]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leides Barroso Azevedo]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A08">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade de Brasília  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>02</numero>
<fpage>213</fpage>
<lpage>222</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2178-52012013000200008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2178-52012013000200008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2178-52012013000200008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[A ideia de universidades que sejam mais qualificadas que outras sempre esteve presente na estratificação dos sistemas de Ensino Superior. Enquanto no topo da hierarquia das instituições universitárias estão as universidades de ponta, isto é, universidades consideradas detentoras de maior prestígio e reputação, nos escalões inferiores podem ser encontradas as instituições que procuram democratizar e universalizar o acesso à Educação Superior. O texto primeiramente argumenta que, atualmente, quando se reflete acerca do Ensino Superior mundial, o prestígio das instituições universitárias está sendo cada vez mais definido pelas publicações dos sistemas de ranqueamentos nacionais e internacionais. A seguir, apresenta-se uma história do processo de implantação e evolução dos instrumentos de ranqueamento de instituições universitárias e da transição do modo de produzir reputação universitária. Enquanto no passado a reputação era avaliada por um processo de acumulação de prestígio repassado pela tradição sem a confirmação de dados para oferecer suporte às percepções, hoje esse processo é quantificado e sistematizado a partir da introdução de instrumentos que pretendem mensurar o desempenho institucional. Finalmente, o texto explora as implicações dos sistemas de ranqueamento e conclui oferecendo uma reflexão acerca dos fetiches gerados por esses instrumentos de divulgação e comparação de desempenho universitário.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The concept of a group of universities being better qualified than others has always existed within the stratification of higher education systems. Whereas at the top of the higher education hierarchy are first class universities, or rather, universities with the highest prestige and reputation, the institutions that provide democratic and universal access to higher education may be found at lower levels. Current essay argues that higher education reputation is being defined increasingly by national and international ranking systems. It also provides a history of the establishment and development of ranking instruments for higher education and highlights the transition towards a production of university reputation. Whereas in the past reputation was evaluated through a process of prestige accumulation and tradition, without the confirmation of any foregrounding data, this process is currently quantified and systematized by the introduction of tools to measure the institutions’ performance. The ensuing discussion also identifies the implications of the ranking system and identifies myths produced by these instruments that broadcast and compare university performance.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Educação]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Educação Superior]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Sistemas de Ranqueamentos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Globalização]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Education]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Ranking Systems]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Globalization]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <h2>Ranqueamento  de universidades: reflex&otilde;es acerca da constru&ccedil;&atilde;o de reconhecimento  institucional.</h2> <h3>University rankings: reflections on the construction  of institutional acknowledgment.</h3>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <h4>Bruno  Azevedo Moura; Leides Barroso Azevedo Moura</h4> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Revista Ensino Superior]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>86-95</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Research and Development Management]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>243-255</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Research Policy]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>109-121</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Acta Scientiarum. Education]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>281-290</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Frontier Education China]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>477-506</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Ensino Superior Unicamp]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>47-68</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Ensino Superior Unicamp]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>29-36</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[European Educational Research Journal]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>438-450</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Policy Futures in Education]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<source><![CDATA[Estudos Avançados]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>56</numero>
<issue>56</issue>
<page-range>161-189</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
