<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2236-3459</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[História da Educação]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Hist. Educ.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2236-3459</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Associação Sul-Rio-Grandense de Pesquisadores em História da Educação]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2236-34592016000300219</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/2236-3459/62002</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[As disputas editoriais no campo do programa do livro didático para o ensino fundamental do instituto nacional do livro - Plidef/INL (1971-1976)]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The editorial disputes in the field of the textbook program for elementary education of the national book institute - Plidef/INL (1971-1976)]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Las disputas editoriales en el campo del programa del libro didáctico para la enseñanza fundamental del instituto nacional del libro - Plidef/INL (1971-1976)]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Les conflits éditoriaux dans le domaine du programme des manuels pour l'école élémentaire de l'institut National du Livre (1971-1976)]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eliane]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vahl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mônica Maciel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Federal de Pelotas Faculdade de Educação ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Pelotas RS]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>50</numero>
<fpage>219</fpage>
<lpage>241</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2236-34592016000300219&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2236-34592016000300219&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2236-34592016000300219&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo Neste artigo se analisa as disputas que envolveram o Programa do Livro Did&#225;tico para o Ensino Fundamental do Instituto Nacional do Livro - Plidef/INL - e o mercado editorial durante os anos de 1971 a 1976. Para tanto foi utilizado o referencial te&#243;rico de campo de Bourdieu (1989, 1994, 1997, 2003). Os dados da pesquisa foram coletados em documentos oficiais e escolares, reportagens em peri&#243;dicos e livros did&#225;ticos. Os resultados indicam a presen&#231;a de trinta e seis editoras no Programa, contudo, apenas nove publicaram mais de 70% dos t&#237;tulos. Os resultados tamb&#233;m identificam v&#225;rias estrat&#233;gias de difus&#227;o dos livros como distribui&#231;&#227;o gratuita, promo&#231;&#227;o de concursos e realiza&#231;&#227;o de cursos de forma&#231;&#227;o para professores.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract This article analyses the disputes involving the Textbook Program for Elementary Education of the National Book Institute - Plidef/INL - and the publishing market during the years 1971 and 1976. For this purpose, the theoretical field framework of Bourdieu (1989, 1994, 1997, 2003) was used. The data were collected in government and school documents, articles in periodicals, and textbooks. The results indicate the presence of thirty-six publishing houses in the Program; however, only nine published more than 70% of titles. The results also identify various strategies employed for dissemination of the books, such as free distribution, promotional contests, and completion of training courses for teachers.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Este art&#237;culo analiza las disputas que envolvieron el Programa del Libro Did&#225;ctico para la Ense&#241;anza Fundamental del Instituto Nacional del Libro - Plidef/INL - y el mercado editorial durante los a&#241;os 1971 y 1976. Para ello, fue usado el referente te&#243;rico de campo de Bourdieu (1989, 1994, 1997, 2003). Los datos de la investigaci&#243;n fueron colectados de documentos oficiales y escolares, reportajes de peri&#243;dicos y libros did&#225;cticos. Los resultados indican la presencia de treinta y seis editoriales en el Programa, con todo, apenas nueve publicaron m&#225;s del 70% de los t&#237;tulos. Los resultados tambi&#233;n identifican varias estrategias de difusi&#243;n de los libros como la distribuci&#243;n gratuita, promoci&#243;n de concursos y ejecuci&#243;n de cursos de formaci&#243;n de profesores.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[R&#233;sum&#233; Cet article analyse les conflits impliquant le Programme des Manuels pour l'&#201;cole &#201;l&#233;mentaire de l'Institut National du Livre et le march&#233; de l'&#233;dition pendant les ann&#233;es 1971-1976. Dans ce but, le cadre th&#233;orique utilis&#233; a &#233;t&#233; bas&#233; sur la notion de champ de Bourdieu (1989, 1994, 1997, 2003). Les donn&#233;es de la recherche ont &#233;t&#233; recueillies &#224; partir de documents officiels et scolaires, d'articles de p&#233;riodiques et de manuels scolaires. Les r&#233;sultats indiquent la pr&#233;sence de trente-six &#233;diteurs dans le Programme, cependant, seulement ont publi&#233; plus de 70% des titres. Les r&#233;sultats identifient aussi plusieurs strat&#233;gies de diffusion des livres, comme la distribution gratuite, la promotion de concours et de cours de formation pour les enseignants.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Instituto Nacional do Livro]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Livro Didático]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Mercado Editorial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[National Book Institute]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Textbook]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Publishing Market]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Instituto Nacional del Libro]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Libro Didáctico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Mercado Editorial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Institut National du Livre]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Manuels]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Marché de L'édition]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
